Q8(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q7(a) Q6(c) →

Distinguish between family and household as sociological concepts.

Topic: Systems of Kinship. Syllabus: Systems of Kinship: Family, household, marriage; Types and forms of family; Lineage and descent; Patriarchy and sexual division of labour; Contemporary trends. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Systems of Kinship.

Revision summary

Family: kinship, descent, alliance, and care norms, including non-resident kin. Household: coresidence and shared domestic economy, including non-kin. Mead, Levi-Strauss, Parsons, Marx, and Oakley attach to family functions and household labour. Census and NFHS count households; family obligations often exceed the roof. Distinction matters for migration, servants, and women’s claims.

Model answer

Introduction

Family and household are often collapsed in everyday talk and in some Census tables. Sociologically they answer different questions. Family is a kinship and marriage relation. Household is a residential and commensal unit.

Body

Family

  • A set of relations of descent, alliance, and parenthood, with norms of care, sexuality, and succession.
  • It can be nuclear, joint, or extended in ideology without sharing one roof.
  • George Herbert Mead: the family as the first game of roles, which can include absent kin.
  • Claude Levi-Strauss: alliance may bind groups who never coreside.
  • Talcott Parsons specialised the modern family in socialisation; that is a function of a kinship unit, not a house plan.

Household

  • Persons who live together and typically share a cooking pot, as Census household definitions try to capture.
  • Can include servants, lodgers, and friends: not all are kin.
  • Can exclude migrant spouses and children who remain family.
  • Karl Marx: the household is often the site of reproduction of labour-power, including unpaid care that Ann Oakley made visible.

Distinction

  • Family is jural and moral belonging. Household is a dwelling-and-budget unit.
  • Max Weber’s household communism of consumption is a possible household form, not the whole of kinship.
  • Emile Durkheim’s domestic morals can stretch across several households of a lineage.
  • NFHS interviews a household; many family decisions sit with kin outside it.

Why the cut matters

  • Policy that targets “household income” can miss women’s natal family claims and split-migrant families.
  • Calling every Census house a “family” hides female-headed residential units that still sit in a patriarchal family system.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  FAM[Family kinship alliance] --> OBL[Care descent marriage]
  HH[Household residence] --> POT[Shared dwelling budget]
  FAM --> OVER[Overlap not identity]
  HH --> OVER

Conclusion

Family names kinship, marriage, and care obligations. Household names who coresides and shares a domestic economy. Mead, Levi-Strauss, Marx, and official surveys all need the split. Do not read the cooking pot as the whole of kinship, or the lineage as a single address.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Explain how the pattern of patriarchy is being altered in a family and at the workplace in the present context.

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the changing nature of kinship relations in the contemporary world.

    View answer →

  3. 2019 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    In the light of judicial intervention on 'Live-in relationships', discuss the future of marriage and family in India

    View answer →

  4. 2018 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What are the new forms of family in developed societies? Discuss

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Distinguish between family and household with reference to the concept of development of the household.

    View answer →

  6. 2017 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine 'patriarchal bargain ' as gendered division of work in contemporary India

    View answer →

  7. 2017 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine the relationship between the contemporary trends in marriage and changing from family

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    How do the rules of descent and alliance in kinship differ from each other? Illustrate.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Give an account of the recent trends of marriage in the Indian context. How are these different from traditional practices?

Systems of Kinship

Traditional Indian marriage was typically early, arranged, caste-endogamous and family-led. Regional and religious diversity always qualified the textbook joint-family model. Recent trends include later age, schooling, online matching, dual earners and more public exit options. Endogamy and parental ratification persist inside modern forms such as matrimonial apps. Inter-caste, live-in and queer unions are visible but still minority or legally incomplete. The story is hybridisation of alliance, not a clean replacement by Western companionate marriage.

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Explain how the pattern of patriarchy is being altered in a family and at the workplace in the present context.

Systems of Kinship

Patriarchy is male dominance across household and work; it can change form. Family: more dual earning and law, still care, honour, and NFHS violence. Workplace: some professions and SHGs, still informal segregation. WFH and lockdown reorganised rather than ended the double day. Walby’s public patriarchy is the best short map.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.