Q6(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q8(c)

How do the rules of descent and alliance in kinship differ from each other? Illustrate.

Topic: Systems of Kinship. Syllabus: Systems of Kinship: Family, household, marriage; Types and forms of family; Lineage and descent; Patriarchy and sexual division of labour; Contemporary trends. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Systems of Kinship.

Revision summary

Descent: who belongs across generations (patriliny, matriliny, bilateral). Alliance: who marries whom and how groups exchange spouses (Levi-Strauss, Dumont). North Indian lineage-plus-exogamy versus South Indian cross-cousin prescription illustrate the cut. Caste endogamy is alliance at jati level. Household in the Census is not the descent group.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Descent rules say who belongs to a kin group across generations. Alliance rules say who may or must marry whom, and how groups exchange spouses. They interlock, but they answer different questions.

Body

Descent

  • Unilineal descent traces through father (patriliny) or mother (matriliny). Cognatic and bilateral systems count both.
  • Descent allocates membership, often property, ancestor worship, and jural identity.
  • Illustration: a North Indian patrilineage (gotra, kul) as a descent corporation; Khasi matriliny as descent through women.

Alliance

  • Claude Levi-Strauss treated the incest taboo and the exchange of spouses as the elementary structure of kinship.
  • Positive rules (prescriptive cross-cousin marriage) and negative rules (whom one must not marry) organise alliance.
  • Louis Dumont read South Indian kinship as alliance between groups, not only as a tree of descent.
  • Illustration: Dravidian cross-cousin marriage as repeating alliance; North Indian sapinda and village exogamy as negative alliance with strong patrilineal descent.

Difference

  • Descent is filiation through time. Alliance is marriage between groups in a generation and the next.
  • A society can have strong descent and weak prescription, or strong alliance with shallow descent names.
  • Caste endogamy is an alliance rule at a higher level: marry inside the jati, outside the lineage.

Mead and the household

  • George Herbert Mead’s family as the first game of roles is socialisation, not a substitute for these jural rules.
  • Census household is not the lineage. Household and kin group must not be collapsed.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  DES[Descent membership] --> TIME[Across generations]
  ALL[Alliance marriage] --> EX[Exchange of spouses]
  DES --> KIN[Kinship system]
  ALL[ALL] --> KIN[KIN]

Conclusion

Descent assigns membership through parentage. Alliance assigns marriage relations among groups. Levi-Strauss and Dumont centre exchange; lineage theory centres the corporation. Indian North–South contrasts illustrate the difference without making either region a pure type.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Does descent determine marriage?

    It constrains it. Alliance theory asks for the positive pattern of exchange, not only the tree.

  • Is gotra descent or alliance?

    Gotra is a descent category that also works as a negative alliance rule: do not marry inside it.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Give an account of the recent trends of marriage in the Indian context. How are these different from traditional practices?

Systems of Kinship

Traditional Indian marriage was typically early, arranged, caste-endogamous and family-led. Regional and religious diversity always qualified the textbook joint-family model. Recent trends include later age, schooling, online matching, dual earners and more public exit options. Endogamy and parental ratification persist inside modern forms such as matrimonial apps. Inter-caste, live-in and queer unions are visible but still minority or legally incomplete. The story is hybridisation of alliance, not a clean replacement by Western companionate marriage.

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Discuss the changing nature of kinship relations in the contemporary world.

Systems of Kinship

Kinship organises descent, marriage, and care; it is stretching, not dying. Alliance and caste endogamy persist beside delayed marriage and chosen intimacy. Migration, IVF, and law split biological and social parenthood. Census and NFHS show mixed households. COVID made kin the shock-absorber of care and shelter.

Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · Solution

Explain how the pattern of patriarchy is being altered in a family and at the workplace in the present context.

Systems of Kinship

Patriarchy is male dominance across household and work; it can change form. Family: more dual earning and law, still care, honour, and NFHS violence. Workplace: some professions and SHGs, still informal segregation. WFH and lockdown reorganised rather than ended the double day. Walby’s public patriarchy is the best short map.

PDF