Revision summary
Trump’s 2025 reciprocal tariffs, on top of a blocked Appellate Body, treat MFN as optional and threaten WTO as policeman. Salvage options: restore appeals or widen MPIA, plurilaterals, a subsidy-for-S&DT reform bargain, G20 politics, and FTA hedges. India’s stake is public stockholding, digital rules and a forum in which power is not the only law. A variable-geometry WTO is more likely than a 1995 restoration. Letting the organisation die would leave only tariff nationalism.
Model answer
Introduction
The WTO was the legal roof of a rule-based trading order after 1995. Trump’s reciprocal tariffs in 2025, layered on an Appellate Body that the United States had already starved, threaten that roof in the open. Members cannot pretend the organisation is fine. They can try to salvage it. Options exist. A full restoration of 1995 is not one of them in the near term.
Body
The threat
Unilateral ‘reciprocal’ tariffs treat MFN as optional. If the largest economy prices every bilateral deficit as a sin, GATT Article I is a sermon. The dispute system cannot discipline what it cannot hear. Other members then copy: industrial policy, export controls, green tariffs. Weaponised interdependence becomes the operating system. Developing countries lose the one forum where a small state could, in theory, win a panel.
Salvage options
First, restore a functioning appellate tier — either by ending the U.S. blockade or by widening the MPIA (multi-party interim appeal) so that a critical mass trades under law even if Washington stays out. Second, plurilateral deals among the willing (e-commerce, investment facilitation) that do not wait for consensus, with opt-ins for the South. Third, a reform bargain: more transparency on industrial subsidies (including China’s), in exchange for real special and differential treatment and a peace clause that India can live with on public stockholding. Fourth, G20 and UNCTAD political steering so that trade is not only a Geneva technician’s file. Fifth, hedge with FTAs (India–EU, RCEP-adjacent supply chains) without abandoning the WTO brand — salvage is dual-track.
Power and India
Options fail if they require the U.S. to become 1995 again. Salvage may mean a WTO of variable geometry: a core of members who sue and comply, a periphery of tariff nationalists. India should not be the periphery. It needs the legal roof for food security, for resisting punitive digital rules, and for suing when its goods are hit. It should not, however, treat every reform as a Northern trick. A salvage coalition with the EU, ASEAN, Brazil and African exporters is more serious than a solo veto identity.
The organisation is salvageable as a rule-language and notification machine even if it is weak as a policeman. Letting it die would leave only power. That is the 1930s lesson the syllabus still wants.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Trump reciprocal tariffs] --> W[WTO stress] AB[Dead Appellate Body] --> W S[Salvage] --> M[MPIA / restore AB] S --> P[Plurilaterals] S --> R[Reform S&DT stocks]
Conclusion
Reciprocal tariffs plus a dead appeals bench are an existential stress test. Members can salvage WTO through MPIA, plurilaterals, a subsidy–S&DT bargain and FTA hedges. They cannot wait for Washington to repent.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
NonAlignment 2·0 underscores India's unique aspiration to emerge as a site for an alternative universality. Comment
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Can India sue the United States at WTO over tariffs?
It can start a case. With no Appellate Body and a nationalist White House, winning on paper may not open the U.S. market. That is why salvage is political as well as legal.
-
Do FTAs replace WTO?
They hedge. They cannot set global MFN or a single subsidy rule. Dual-track is salvage, not abandonment.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment. -
2025 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises. -
2025 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights. -
2025 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The world currently has been in the throes of a twin process of 'democratic backsliding' and 'democratic backlash'. How would you explain this paradox? -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
How successful has the 'ASEAN Plus Three' been in addressing regional problems? Support your answer with specific examples -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
"Trump's return to the White House is a jolt to push the European Union to invest in its own defence and economic and technological revival." Comment -
2025 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Would you agree with the contention that India's inclination to lean on a 'more aggressive hyper-realist posture' has gained a new momentum in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist strike? Comment. -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.