Revision summary
Transnational actors are organised non-state forces that operate across borders. MNCs, epistemic communities, NGOs, terrorist and criminal networks, diasporas and platforms are the main types. They changed agenda-setting, norms and sometimes the use of force — a qualitative, not only quantitative, shift. Keohane, Nye, Rosenau, Haas and Strange supply theory. The state still licenses, bans and fights; world politics is a mesh, not a replacement of Westphalia.
Model answer
Introduction
Transnational actors are organised forces that work across borders without being sovereign states: firms, churches, scientific networks, terror groups, diasporas and platforms. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye, James Rosenau, and later constructivists argued that they changed not only the quantity of international contacts but the quality of world politics — who sets agendas, who writes norms, who can hurt.
Body
Market and expert actors
Multinational corporations allocate investment, set labour and data standards, and lobby trade rounds. Apple, Aramco, and semiconductor alliances shape the Indo-Pacific as surely as destroyers. Epistemic communities — Peter Haas — wrote the ozone regime and still staff climate IPCC summaries. Philanthropic verticals (Gavi, Global Fund, large foundations) bankroll vaccines when WHO’s assessed budget cannot. These actors bring fresh insight: they see supply chains and pathogens that foreign ministries meet late.
Norm and protest actors
Amnesty, ICRC, climate NGOs, and feminist transnational networks (from CEDAW lobbying to Woman, Life, Freedom amplification) name shame and draft soft law. The International Campaign to Ban Landmines showed that a coalition of NGOs and middle powers can produce a treaty great powers dislike. Such actors do not replace the UN; they crowd it.
Dark and hybrid actors
Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Lashkar-type groups are transnational too. They forced states into extra-territorial war and surveillance. Criminal markets in fentanyl, arms and wildlife fold into non-traditional security. Digital platforms — X, Meta, TikTok — are a new class: they socialise open and closed societies, host both democratic backlash and disinformation. Diasporas fund parties, temples, and sometimes militancy.
Qualitative transformation
The transformation is polycentric authority. Issues are no longer only inter-state. Human rights, climate, health and tech standards are made in a mesh. Yet the state is not obsolete. It licenses firms, bans apps, kills terrorists, and still monopolises legitimate nuclear arms. Susan Strange’s structural power of finance and knowledge sits beside Waltz’s military structure. A 2025 world of Trump tariffs, WHO fights and Pahalgam terrorism is unintelligible if one counts only foreign offices. It is equally unintelligible if one pretends Google can sign a peace treaty.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Transnational actors] --> M[MNCs and platforms] T --> N[NGOs and epistemes] T --> V[Violent and criminal nets] T --> D[Diasporas] S[State] -.licenses and fights.-> T
Conclusion
- Transnational actors added new authors to world politics: capital, science, conscience, crime and code. They transformed agendas and sometimes force. They did not abolish the state; they made it share the stage.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Of late, centrist and centre-left political parties have been facing setbacks while centre-right parties have been in ascendency the world over. Comment
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is the UN a transnational actor?
The UN is an intergovernmental organisation of states. Many of its agencies host transnational professionals, but legal authority still runs through members.
-
Are Big Tech firms more powerful than states?
In data and attention, sometimes. In taxation, war and borders, states can still ban, break up or draft them — as India, the EU and the U.S. have each shown.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Collective security and responsibility to protect (R2P) are uniform neither in scope, goals and methods. Explain -
2023 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the relevance of the normative ethos of the Non-Aligned Movement in magnifying India's soft power in pursuit of her national interest -
2022 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
National Interest is an essentially contested concept. Comment. -
2022 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the conceptual dimensions of collective security -
2021 · Q2(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What is complex interdependence? Discuss the role of transnational actors in the international system
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.