Revision summary
Many democracies since the late 2010s show centre-left and centrist losses and centre-right or radical-right gains. Drivers include migration, post-COVID inflation, culture war, housing and the split of the old working-class vote. Inglehart’s counter-revolution and Piketty’s Brahmin-left sketch help; they do not travel unchanged to India or Latin America. UK Labour 2024 and other cases are exceptions; not every right victory is fascism. The wave still shapes IR: tariffs, NATO, WHO and China policy.
Model answer
Introduction
- Since the late 2010s, a comparative pattern has been hard to miss: centrist and centre-left parties have lost vote share or office in many industrial and some developing democracies, while centre-right and radical-right lists have risen. The pattern is not a law of history. It is a cluster of elections that asks for political-economy and cultural explanation together.
Body
The map
Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, the French right’s strength around Marine Le Pen even when the Élysée is held by a centrist, Germany’s AfD surge in the east, the Netherlands’ anti-migration turns, Javier Milei in Argentina, and Donald Trump’s return to the White House in 2025 are the headline cases. Social democrats who once owned the industrial working class now split that class with nativist lists. Third Way centrism after Clinton–Blair looks exhausted: it is blamed both for austerity and for cultural liberalism.
Drivers
Migration and identity became first-order after 2015 in Europe and remain so. Inflation after COVID and the Ukraine war punished incumbents, many of them centre-left or technocratic. Housing and energy costs hurt median voters more than GDP charts. Culture-war issues — gender, religion, universities — let the right speak a moral language the professional left often concedes. Social media rewards anger. Democratic backsliding literature warns that some right victories then attack referees; not all do on day one.
Political science should not flatten this into “the masses failed the Enlightenment.” Ronald Inglehart’s silent revolution produced a silent counter-revolution. Thomas Piketty’s Brahmin-left versus merchant-right split in Western electorates is a useful sketch: educated professionals stayed left-liberal; many non-graduates moved right. In the Global South the same words map poorly: India’s BJP is a civilisational right with welfare delivery; Latin America’s pendulum still swings (Chile, Brazil, Mexico) rather than locking.
Exceptions and caution
The United Kingdom’s 2024 Labour landslide, periodic Nordic social-democratic holds, and urban-liberal majorities in several U.S. states are exceptions. Centre-left can still win when it owns competence on wages and public services and does not treat voters as a seminar. Centre-right ascent is also not identical to fascism: Christian democrats, Gaullists and India’s broad right are unlike interwar blackshirts. The danger is coalition gravity — mainstream right adopting radical-right frames on migration and press freedom.
For IR, the trend matters because it produces tariff nationalism, NATO burden-shifting, WHO scepticism and a harder line on China — the Trump shock to the EU in Q4(c). Comparative politics and international politics here are one story.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Drivers] --> M[Migration identity] D --> I[Inflation housing] D --> C[Culture and media] D --> L[Left-professional split] L --> R[Centre-right ascent]
Conclusion
Centre-left setbacks and centre-right ascent are a real, incomplete wave driven by migration, prices, culture and distrust of elites. Exceptions exist. The task is to explain the wave without baptising every conservative win as the end of democracy, and without ignoring the referees some of those wins then threaten.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Collective security and responsibility to protect (R2P) are uniform neither in scope, goals and methods. Explain
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is this only a Western story?
The densest data are European and American. Latin America still pendulums. Several Asian democracies have their own conservative-national turns that are not copies of AfD.
-
Did the centre-left lose because of ‘woke’ politics?
Culture is one driver, not the only. Inflation, housing and migration management explain at least as much. A monocausal culture story is campaign rhetoric, not comparative politics.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political socialization of open and closed societies. -
2024 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the major recent social movements related to the physical rights of women in various countries of the world. -
2024 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the role of political parties in sustaining and stabilising democracies in the developing societies. -
2022 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of social movements in strengthening the democratic processes in developing societies -
2021 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.