Revision summary
Democratic backsliding is incremental erosion of referees by elected executives, not always a coup. Democratic backlash is resistance by courts, streets, media and opposition victories. The paradox is that both run together in a polarised decade, on different clocks. Hungary, the United States, Brazil, Poland and Iran illustrate different mixes of erosion and resistance. Not every backlash is liberal; the task is to distinguish civic repair from counter-populism.
Model answer
Introduction
The 2020s are not a simple story of democracy’s death or of democracy’s revenge. Nancy Bermeo, Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, and the V-Dem project describe democratic backsliding: erosion from inside, often by elected executives. At the same time, democratic backlash — courts, streets, journalists, and opposition wins — has returned in several places. The paradox is that both processes now run as twins, not as chapters in sequence.
Body
Backsliding
Backsliding is rarely a colonels’ coup. It is executive aggrandisement, packed courts, captured regulators, tilted electoral law, harassment of the press, and the treatment of opponents as enemies of the nation. Hungary under Viktor Orbán, Turkey after successive shocks to the opposition, Venezuela’s long hollow, and fights over certification and the rule of law in the United States are standard illustrations. Culture war, migration panics, and inequality supply the fuel. Centre-right and radical-right coalitions have been the usual vehicles, which is why the next question on left setbacks belongs in the same decade.
Backlash
Backlash is not automatic sunshine. It is costly mobilisation. Poland’s 2023 opposition coalition ended eight years of Law and Justice rule. Brazil’s 2022 vote removed Jair Bolsonaro, then had to survive a 8 January 2023 assault on the plazas of power. Israel’s 2023 judicial-overhaul crisis filled the streets. Women’s movements, including Iranian and other West Asian protests, are backlash against patriarchal closure, not only against a left–right scorecard. In India, a noisy opposition, a still-independent strand of the higher judiciary, and a competitive if strained federal map are part of backlash capacity even when critics allege backsliding on other metrics.
Why the twin process
The paradox dissolves once time-scales are separated. Backsliding is often incremental and legalistic. Backlash is episodic and public. Polarisation produces both: the same identity heat that lets a leader dismantle referees also produces counter-identity. International demonstration effects work both ways — Orbánism travels, so do protest repertoires. Digital platforms organise rallies and also drown them in disinformation. Robert Dahl’s polyarchy always rested on contestation plus inclusion; when contestation is attacked, inclusion fights back, unevenly.
- A further twist: backlash can itself be illiberal (majoritarian street against minorities). Not every crowd is a civic culture. The analyst’s job is to sort liberal-democratic repair from counter-populism. The world is in the throes of both, which is why a single headline — “the end of democracy” or “the people have won” — is bad comparative politics.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Polarisation] --> B[Backsliding] P --> L[Backlash] B --> E[Captured referees] L --> R[Courts streets votes] E -.meets.-> R
Conclusion
Backsliding erodes referees from above. Backlash tries to restore or reinvent them from below and beside. They coexist because polarised societies produce both strongmen and their antibodies. The outcome is unsettled, country by country.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The withdrawal of the United States of America from the World Health Organization is set to have far-reaching impacts on global health. Reimagining the existing WHO is vital for the global health agenda. Discuss
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Is backsliding the same as a coup?
Usually no. Bermeo distinguishes promissory coups, executive aggrandisement and strategic harassment of the opposition. The last two dominate recent cases.
-
Does backlash always win?
No. Turkey, Venezuela and several Sahel cases show failed or reversed backlash. Wins need organisation, elite splits and usable institutions.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment. -
2025 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises. -
2025 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the Red Lipstick Movement in the context of feminist rights. -
2025 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
How successful has the 'ASEAN Plus Three' been in addressing regional problems? Support your answer with specific examples -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
"Trump's return to the White House is a jolt to push the European Union to invest in its own defence and economic and technological revival." Comment -
2025 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Would you agree with the contention that India's inclination to lean on a 'more aggressive hyper-realist posture' has gained a new momentum in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terrorist strike? Comment. -
2025 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the psychological approach to the study of comparative politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The psychological approach studies personality, attitudes, civic culture and cognition in comparative politics. Lasswell, Adorno, Almond and Verba, Easton and later political psychology are the main lineage. It explains voting, protest, obedience and leadership better than a constitution or a class map alone. Surveys, experiments and psychobiography are typical methods. It is a layer, not a substitute for institutions and political economy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Neo-liberalism lightened neo-realism's dark view of international politics. Comment.
Comparative Politics
Waltzian neorealism pictures anarchy, self-help and relative gains as a dark constant. Keohane and Nye’s neoliberalism keeps anarchy but adds complex interdependence, regimes and absolute gains. Institutions reduce cheating and transaction costs; they do not create a world state. Ukraine, tariffs and health-governance shocks show both residual darkness and institutional repair. The ‘lightening’ is cooperation under anarchy, not the end of power politics.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the non-traditional security threats in the context of food and environmental crises.
Comparative Politics
Non-traditional security covers harms beyond organised military attack: food, environment, health, cyber and crime. Food security is availability, access, utilisation and stability; war, climate and export bans can all break it. Environmental crisis is a threat multiplier through climate, water, disaster and migration. UNDP 1994 human security and Buzan’s sectors supply the theory. These shocks overload the state and also force cooperation through FAO, WHO, Paris and regional reserves.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.