Revision summary
India wants a multipolar order with a reformed Security Council. Multi-alignment replaces single-camp Cold War maps. The Indo-Pacific and the Quad sit beside BRICS and NAM memory. NIEO justice claims return as WTO, climate, and digital rules. The vision mixes realist balancing of China with institutional rule-shaping.
Model answer
Introduction
India’s 21st-century vision is a multipolar, reformed multilateral order in which the Global South has voice and India has a seat at the high table. It is not a call to smash the UN. It is a call to update 1945.
Body
What the vision contains
- Reformed UN Security Council, with India as a permanent member, as the political centrepiece.
- Strategic autonomy and multi-alignment: work with the Quad and with BRICS, with the US and with Russia, without a NATO treaty.
- Rules that are not only Western, yet not a Chinese hierarchy: a free and open Indo-Pacific plus Panchsheel language of coexistence.
- Economic order: WTO reform, climate justice, digital public infrastructure as a Southern offering, and NIEO-like policy space inside globalisation.
- Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and yoga-era public diplomacy as the cultural dressing of the same claim, which Nye would call soft power.
How it differs from 1974 and from NAM purity
- India now wants to shape rules as a rising power, not only to denounce them as a have-not.
- It accepts globalisation’s markets while demanding fairer fisheries, food, and finance outcomes.
- It treats China as a rival to be balanced, which 1950s coexistence did not have to do in the same way.
Realist and institutional mix
- Waltz and Mearsheimer explain the China-balancing half.
- Keohane’s institutions explain why India still invests in the UN, G20, and WTO rather than in pure self-help.
- The vision therefore is a concert of several poles, not unipolarity and not a revolutionary anti-system.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD V[Indian vision] --> M[Multipolarity autonomy] V --> U[UNSC reform G20] V --> I[Indo-Pacific Quad] V --> S[Global South NIEO spirit]
Conclusion
India’s 21st-century new world order is multipolar, UN-reformed, economically more equal, and Indo-Pacific in geography. Autonomy is the method. A permanent Council seat and Global South voice are the tests of whether the vision is succeeding.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q1(e)). View answer →
-
Is this a Chinese-style new order?
No. India rejects a Beijing-centred hierarchy and still uses UN Charter and Quad language against it.
-
Does Vasudhaiva replace national interest?
It is a public-diplomacy frame. Morgenthau’s interest as power still operates in border and nuclear policy.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2021 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow. -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain India's position on the waiver of intellectual property rights on COVID-19 vaccines in WTO. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this topic
Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
For India, a multipolar world order would also mean a multipolar Asia. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
A multipolar world is several great-power centres; it is hollow for India if Asia is Sino-centric. India’s threats, trade and waters are Asian, so Asian power-sharing is the real test of the slogan. Japan, ASEAN centrality, Korea, Australia and India beside China and the U.S. are the intended map. Quad and FOIP are instruments of pluralism, not a finished concert. The claim is right as strategy and still aspirational as fact.
Q5(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
China's growing footprint and a tangible shift in power dynamics in Bangladesh has weakened India's leverage in Dhaka. Comment.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
India’s Bangladesh leverage after 2009 was tied to Sheikh Hasina; her 2024 exit opened space for China. Beijing’s BRI projects, credit and defence courtship give Dhaka an omni-enmeshment option. Indian delays on Teesta, a trade surplus and political optics of patronage stored grievances. The shift weakens Delhi’s privileged access but does not erase geography, power trade or transit. A less personality-based Neighbourhood First is the repair, not a hyper-realist sulk.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Would you concur with the view that of late, India's foreign policy has been in a transition mode from Nehruvianism to Neoliberalism? Support your answer with the help of suitable examples.
Recent developments in Indian Foreign policy
Nehruvianism meant NAM, UN moralism and refusal of blocs; neoliberalism in this debate means markets, U.S. partnership and globalisation. 1991, Act East, the U.S. nuclear bargain and the Quad are the visible transition. India still refuses formal alliance, keeps Russia, defends WTO policy space and talks Global South — Nehruvian residues. Concur partly: instruments have shifted; doctrine of autonomy has not been abolished. Multi-alignment is the mix, not a clean replacement of one school by the other.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.