Revision summary
ASEAN’s success is peace, process, and diplomatic centrality. The ASEAN Way traded speed for inclusion. AFTA and related economic projects thickened interdependence. SAARC is the usual foil: ASEAN had no permanent intra-club freeze of that kind. South China Sea and Myanmar show the ceiling of consensus.
Model answer
Introduction
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, founded in 1967, is the most successful regional club in the developing world. Success is peace among members, centrality in Asian diplomacy, and thick economic habits. It is not a European Union.
Body
What success looks like
- No interstate war among members after the expansion of the club, despite earlier Konfrontasi-type memories.
- The ASEAN Way: consultation, non-interference, and consensus lowered the cost of sitting together.
- Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, ASEAN Regional Forum, and later the East Asia Summit placed ASEAN in the chair of wider tables.
- AFTA and the ASEAN Economic Community built a production and tariff habit even if the single market is incomplete.
Why it worked better than many Souths
- Anti-communist founding core, later inclusion of Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia, turned a sub-region into a diplomatic unit.
- External powers were invited in as partners, not as members that could capture the secretariat.
- Compared with SAARC, there was no enduring dyadic veto equal to India–Pakistan inside the room.
Limits of the success story
- Myanmar, the South China Sea, and great-power split show the ASEAN Way stalling on hard security.
- Consensus can mean lowest-common-denominator statements.
- Inequality among members and weak enforcement are the price of keeping all flags in.
Measure against the mandate
- Success is regional peace and agenda-setting centrality, not a security community in Karl Deutsch’s full sense.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[ASEAN 1967] --> W[ASEAN Way consensus] W --> P[Peace among members] W --> C[Centrality ARF EAS] W --> E[AFTA economic habit] X[SCS Myanmar] -.limits.-> C
Conclusion
ASEAN succeeded as a diplomatic and economic process that kept diverse States talking and trading. The ASEAN Way and centrality are the achievements. Hard security and China policy remain the unfinished tests. Against SAARC, the success is clear.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain India's relations with the European Union in the context of Brexit
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is ASEAN a security community?
It is a security regime of habits and talk. It is not NATO and not a fully merged demos.
-
Why compare with SAARC?
Both are post-colonial regionalisms. ASEAN delivered process and trade density that SAARC did not.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics. -
2021 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain -
2021 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emergence of neo-realism and its basic tenets -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries -
2021 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What is globalisation? Why is there an intense debate about globalisation and its consequences? -
2021 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? -
2021 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Write about the growing significance of QUAD. -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.