Revision summary
The spirit of Indian federalism is bargaining among units, not only the three Lists. GST created a shared tax forum that the Supreme Court treated as federal dialogue, while compensation and Union weight still skew the table. The 2019 J&K reorganisation is the strongest evidence of unilateral thinning of a constituent unit, even after judicial upholding. The farm laws showed Union overreach into the agrarian political economy; their repeal showed that protest and states can restore bargaining. The Fifteenth Finance Commission remains a constitutional federal mechanism, contested over 2011 population and cesses that bypass the divisible pool.
Model answer
Introduction
India is a Union that Ambedkar said could be both unitary and federal as need required. The ‘true spirit’ of federalism is not only a list of Lists in the Seventh Schedule. It is the habit of bargaining with states as partners. Recent years supply evidence for both erosion and resilience. A critical examination must use the illustrations asked for, not a hymn to cooperative federalism or a dirge.
Body
GST: shared tax, strained voice
The Goods and Services Tax created a common market and a GST Council, which the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Mohit Minerals (2022) described as a forum of federal dialogue whose recommendations have a real, though not dictatorial, force. That is an institutional deepening of shared rule. At the same time, compensation politics, rate-setting in which the Union’s weight is heavy, and delays in meeting states’ cash-flow fears show a spirit that can become Union-led uniformity. K. C. Wheare’s classical coordinate federalism was never India’s model; Granville Austin’s cooperative federalism is closer. GST tests whether cooperation is consent or compliance.
Jammu and Kashmir, 2019
The end of Article 370 and the conversion of a state into Union Territories without the kind of state-legislature consent that many federal theorists would expect is the hardest illustration against the claim. Even if the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional pathway, the political spirit of federalism — that a constituent unit’s identity is not unilaterally thinned — was strained. Ladakh’s demand for a legislature and J&K’s demand for statehood are the aftershocks of that strain.
Farm laws and repeal
The 2020 farm laws used Union entries with thin committee scrutiny. States and farmers treated this as an invasion of agriculture in spirit. Their repeal in 2021 showed that protest and party maps can restore bargaining — resilience from society, not from the original process.
Fifteenth Finance Commission
Using 2011 population, the 15th FC reopened southern fears of being punished for lower fertility. Article 280 remains a federal pillar; cesses that bypass the divisible pool weaken it. The claim of an uneroded spirit is too smooth. GST and the FC still work, roughly. J&K 2019 and the farm laws show unilateralism, partly corrected. Living federalism is this oscillation.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Federal spirit] --> GST[GST Council] F --> FC[15th Finance Commission] F --> JK[2019 J and K] F --> FL[Farm laws / repeal] GST --> MIX[Cooperation and weight] JK --> ER[Erosion risk] FL --> RES[Resilience via protest]
Conclusion
Recent politics has both used and bruised the federal spirit. GST and the Fifteenth Finance Commission keep shared rule alive under Union weight. The 2019 J&K change and the farm laws reveal how far the Centre can go; the farm-law repeal shows that states and movements can still force a return to bargaining. The statement is only half true, and the illustrations are why.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Did the Supreme Court say GST destroyed federalism?
No. In Mohit Minerals it treated the Council as a federal forum and refused to make the Union the sole voice of GST law.
-
Is repeal of the farm laws proof that federalism is healthy?
It is proof that extra-parliamentary and electoral federalism can correct a central statute. It is not proof that the original process honoured states.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the constitutional provisions and nature of advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India. Evaluate your answer with relevant examples -
2023 · Q6(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the major provisions of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act. Do you think that the Act remains an 'unfulfilled dream'? Argue your case -
2023 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The rise of caste politics is to be attributed to both regional aspirations and electoral manifestations. Comment -
2022 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the composition and functions of the Inter-State Council. To what extent has this body been successful in achieving its objectives? -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain the Aristotelian view of politics. To what extent do you think it has contributed to the development of modern-day constitutional democracies?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory
Political Theory
The philosophical approach treats political theory as reasoned inquiry into meaning, right, and the good regime. It defines concepts such as the state, obligation, and justice, and tests them against rival claims. Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, and Rawls are central practitioners of this method. Strauss, Oakeshott, Berlin, and Arendt show that texts and categories still organise modern debate. The approach is not a substitute for behavioural data or institutional history, but it supplies questions that measurement cannot invent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the relation between equality and liberty from the multi-cultural perspective
Political Theory
Liberty is non-arbitrary space of action; equality is the claim that this space belongs to every person. Mill and Berlin warn that liberty can be crushed in the name of a single real self or a uniform good. Taylor, Kymlicka, and Parekh show that recognition and group-differentiated rights can be liberal tools in diverse societies. Uniform rules may still silence minorities; group vetoes may still silence women and dissenters inside a community. The Indian Constitution already pairs equal citizenship with cultural rights, which is the practical form of this relation.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Macpherson's view on power
Political Theory
Macpherson read Hobbes and Locke as theorists of possessive individualism: the person as owner of capacities in a market society. The liberal state in that reading mainly protects property and contract. He then distinguished extractive power, which takes benefit from others, from developmental power, which is the ability to unfold human capacities. Democracy should be judged by equal developmental power, not only by elections or negative liberty. The argument retrieves an ethical liberalism and a non-authoritarian Marxism against a thin competitive elite model of democracy.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.