Revision summary
Locke treats government as a trust to protect life, liberty, and estate under standing law. When the trust is destroyed by arbitrary rule, the government is dissolved and power returns to the community. Revolution is this resumption of original right, not every private act of force against a lawful magistrate. The argument rejects Filmer and answers Hobbes by making a last appeal against tyranny. 1688 and the American Declaration used this grammar of consent and the right to alter destructive government.
Model answer
Introduction
John Locke in the Two Treatises of Government treats government as a trust created by consent to protect life, liberty, and estate. Revolution is not a taste for disorder. It is the residual right of the people when that trust is dissolved by arbitrary power.
Body
The trust and its breach
In the state of nature people have natural law but lack an impartial judge. They form political society and set a legislature that must rule by standing law. The executive is a fiduciary power. If the prince or the legislature acts contrary to the trust — by arbitrary taxation, by destroying the legislature, by placing the people under a foreign power, or by a long train of abuses — government is dissolved. Power returns to the community.
Locke insists that this is not a licence for every discontent. Private force against a lawful magistrate is not the same as the people acting when the constitution is already broken. The appeal is to heaven only when no earthly judge remains. Filmer’s patriarchal kingship is rejected because no one is born the property of a ruler.
Political meaning
The argument armed 1688 and later Jefferson’s 1776 claim that a people may alter a government destructive of rights. It also limits revolution: the end is the restoration of law and property, not a war of all against all. Hobbes feared that right; Locke made it the last check on tyranny. Later constitutional democracy regularises the same idea as elections, higher law, and removable rulers.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Government as trust] --> C[Consent and standing law] T --> B[Breach: arbitrary power] B --> R[People resume power] R --> L[New legislature under rights]
Conclusion
Locke’s view of revolution is the people’s right to resume original power when rulers destroy the trust of consent, law, and rights. It is a constitutional last resort, not a theory of permanent insurrection. Western bills of rights still speak in that language.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Decline of Liberalism.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
Did Locke encourage frequent revolution?
No. He argued that people endure much before they rise, and that the right is triggered by a dissolved constitution, not by ordinary policy disagreement.
-
How does this differ from Hobbes?
Hobbes made sovereign power nearly unlimited once authorised, because the alternative is the state of war. Locke kept a residual popular right against a trustee who becomes a tyrant.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science. -
2024 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Decline of Liberalism. -
2024 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term "political" with appropriate illustrations. -
2024 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Dharmashastra presents a duty-centric worldview for individuals and communities. Comment. -
2024 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine Plato's theory of Forms. -
2024 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The blueprint of Gram Swaraj is the key to understanding the Gandhian perspective on planning. Discuss. -
2024 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically assess the role of pressure groups in the decision-making process of the government. -
2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Normative approach in Political Science.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
With reference to Peruvian experience of planning and economic development, examine how the early phase of economic planning in India has laid the foundation for future development
Political Theory
Peru’s mid-century development mixed export oligarchy with a radical military-planning interlude under Velasco, then crisis and neoliberal reversal. Indian early planning under the Planning Commission and the Mahalanobis strategy built public industry, technical education, and a durable idea of state-led structural change. India’s process was parliamentary and federally argued; Peru’s surge was corporatist and more easily dismantled. Critiques of the Hindu rate of growth and of controls do not cancel the foundational industrial and administrative capacity. The comparison shows that planning founds future development when institutions outlast a single regime, which India did more than Peru.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The decision to conduct Population Census-2027 has reopened the debate on consultation in India. Discuss its various aspects
Political Theory
Census 2027 is a political institution because it will affect delimitation, finance, and recognition after a delayed 2021 count. Federal consultation is required in spirit even though Census is a Union subject, especially for southern states that fear seat and fund losses. Caste enumeration and the NPR reopen debates on identity, privacy, and citizenship trust. Women’s parliamentary reservation is legally tied to post-census delimitation, so consultation on the formula is part of the census debate. A digital method needs consultation on exclusion and data security, or legibility will be mistaken for consent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Political Theory
Regional parties have been decisive vehicles for bringing historically disadvantaged groups into governing politics, not only into vote banks. The BSP made Dalit bahujan power executive in Uttar Pradesh; the DMK mainstreamed non-Brahmin and Tamil publics through Dravidian organisation and welfare. TMC incorporated rural poor, women, and minorities as the decisive Bengal coalition after the Left. TRS/BRS turned a backward region’s dignity claim into a state elite; AAP incorporated urban and agrarian users of public services; JMM brought Adivasi demands into Jharkhand’s party government. Jaffrelot’s silent revolution and Yadav’s democratic upsurges describe this incorporation, which creates new elites even as it opens the system.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.