Revision summary
Liberalism’s core is equal individual rights, limited government, and a civil society distinct from the state. Decline has been claimed in the face of world war, fascism, Stalinism, the social question, and contemporary illiberal majorities. Laski, Schmitt, and communitarians named different failures of classical or procedural liberalism. Rawls, constitutional basic-structure doctrine, and Habermas show a reconstruction rather than a simple death. Decline is a recurring crisis diagnosis; the vocabulary of rights against arbitrary power remains in use.
Model answer
Introduction
Liberalism is the political doctrine of equal individual rights, limited government, law, and a civil society that is not absorbed by the state. Talk of its decline has accompanied almost every crisis of the last century. The task is to say what was said to be declining, and what survived.
Body
What was said to decline
Classical liberalism of Locke, Mill, and the night-watchman state faced mass democracy, organised labour, and two world wars. Harold Laski and others argued that laissez-faire could not meet unemployment and that positive freedom required a social state. Fascism and Stalinism denied the individual as the unit of right. Schmitt attacked liberal parliament as endless talk. After 1945, Berlin feared that positive liberty could crush negative liberty. In the late twentieth century, communitarians said the unencumbered self was empty. Today, populist majorities and surveillance states again test bills of rights.
- Decline, then, has meant several things: the retreat of market-limited government, the weakening of parliamentary civility, and the rise of regimes that reject constitutional limits.
What did not end
Rawls rebuilt liberal justice as fairness. Constitutional courts, including India’s after Kesavananda Bharati, treated basic liberties as not wholly at the mercy of a temporary majority. The welfare state revised liberalism; it did not always abolish it. Habermas still ties legitimacy to public reason. The word decline is accurate as a warning about illiberal concentration of power. It is inaccurate as an obituary. Liberalism remains the language in which those concentrations are still criticised.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD L[Liberal core] --> R[Rights and limited state] D[Talk of decline] --> W[War and dictatorship] D --> S[Social question] D --> P[Populist majority] L --> REC[Rawls courts public reason]
Conclusion
- The decline of liberalism names real pressures: war, mass politics, social crisis, and illiberal rule. The core claim of rights against arbitrary power has been revised more often than it has been buried. Decline is a recurring diagnosis, not a completed historical fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term "political" with appropriate illustrations.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q2(a)). View answer →
-
Is the welfare state the death of liberalism?
Social liberals treat it as an extension of effective liberty. Classical liberals treat it as a threat to limited government. Both still argue inside a rights-and-law frame.
-
Does populism prove liberalism has declined?
It proves that electoral majorities can attack constitutional limits. That is a live danger, not proof that liberal institutions have already vanished.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Behavioral approach to Political Science. -
2024 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's views on Revolution. -
2024 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Elucidate the meanings inherent in the term "political" with appropriate illustrations. -
2024 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Dharmashastra presents a duty-centric worldview for individuals and communities. Comment. -
2024 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine Plato's theory of Forms. -
2024 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
The blueprint of Gram Swaraj is the key to understanding the Gandhian perspective on planning. Discuss. -
2024 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically assess the role of pressure groups in the decision-making process of the government. -
2023 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Normative approach in Political Science.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
With reference to Peruvian experience of planning and economic development, examine how the early phase of economic planning in India has laid the foundation for future development
Political Theory
Peru’s mid-century development mixed export oligarchy with a radical military-planning interlude under Velasco, then crisis and neoliberal reversal. Indian early planning under the Planning Commission and the Mahalanobis strategy built public industry, technical education, and a durable idea of state-led structural change. India’s process was parliamentary and federally argued; Peru’s surge was corporatist and more easily dismantled. Critiques of the Hindu rate of growth and of controls do not cancel the foundational industrial and administrative capacity. The comparison shows that planning founds future development when institutions outlast a single regime, which India did more than Peru.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The decision to conduct Population Census-2027 has reopened the debate on consultation in India. Discuss its various aspects
Political Theory
Census 2027 is a political institution because it will affect delimitation, finance, and recognition after a delayed 2021 count. Federal consultation is required in spirit even though Census is a Union subject, especially for southern states that fear seat and fund losses. Caste enumeration and the NPR reopen debates on identity, privacy, and citizenship trust. Women’s parliamentary reservation is legally tied to post-census delimitation, so consultation on the formula is part of the census debate. A digital method needs consultation on exclusion and data security, or legibility will be mistaken for consent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Political Theory
Regional parties have been decisive vehicles for bringing historically disadvantaged groups into governing politics, not only into vote banks. The BSP made Dalit bahujan power executive in Uttar Pradesh; the DMK mainstreamed non-Brahmin and Tamil publics through Dravidian organisation and welfare. TMC incorporated rural poor, women, and minorities as the decisive Bengal coalition after the Left. TRS/BRS turned a backward region’s dignity claim into a state elite; AAP incorporated urban and agrarian users of public services; JMM brought Adivasi demands into Jharkhand’s party government. Jaffrelot’s silent revolution and Yadav’s democratic upsurges describe this incorporation, which creates new elites even as it opens the system.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.