Revision summary
Hobbes starts from separate, equal, self-preserving individuals, not from a natural polis. Their war of fear makes an undivided sovereign seem necessary. Macpherson named this possessive individualism. Locke keeps individuals and drops absolutism; Hobbes joins the two. The residual individual right is only against immediate self-destruction, not against the civil law as such.
Model answer
Introduction
Thomas Hobbes builds an absolute sovereign out of individuals who fear death. The absolutism is not a medieval corporate chain. It is a machine assembled from equal, separate persons. Individualism is therefore not an accident of Leviathan. It is the starting point of the ideology.
Body
Individuals before the city
- Natural equality is equality of vulnerability: anyone may kill anyone. That is an individualist anthropology, not an Aristotelian zoon politikon.
- Each has a natural right to everything that seems to preserve himself. There is no shared summum bonum.
- Competition, diffidence, and glory are passions of separate agents. The state of war is a relation among individuals without a common judge.
- C. B. Macpherson called this possessive individualism: the person as owner of his own capacities, entering the market of security.
How individualism yields the absolute sword
- Covenants are acts of individuals who authorise one will. The sovereign is a representative person made by those acts.
- Because individuals will otherwise defect, the sword must be undivided. Absolutism is the security technology of atomised fear.
- The subject retains the inalienable individual right not to kill himself or to walk quietly to death, which is a residual individualism inside obedience.
- Religion, guild, and family are not allowed to become rival common powers. That flattening is individualist in method even when the result is a giant state.
Comment: inherent, not identical with liberalism
- Locke keeps individualism and refuses absolutism by adding natural law, property, and trust.
- Hobbes shows that individualism plus extreme insecurity can justify concentration, not only limitation.
- Rousseau attacked this path: the Hobbesian individual is already a product of a fallen comparison, not a natural given.
- Sandel’s later critique of the unencumbered self has a Hobbesian ancestor: persons without constitutive community need an artificial common power.
- Contemporary security states still use Hobbesian individualism: the isolated frightened subject who trades liberty for order.
Limit of the comment
- Hobbes also needs unity, honour of the sovereign, and civil religion. Those are not market individualism.
- Absolutist ideology here means undivided sovereignty, not a cult of the private consumer.
- The accurate comment is: methodological individualism is the premise; political absolutism is the inferred remedy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IND[Equal individuals] --> WAR[State of war] WAR --> COV[Covenant] COV --> ABS[Absolute sovereign] ABS --> RES[Residual right of life]
Conclusion
Hobbes’s absolutism is built from equal, fearful individuals who authorise one sword. Individualism is inherent as method and as residual right of self-preservation. It is not Lockean limited government. It is the paradox of modern sovereignty: atoms produce Leviathan.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Tools of legitimation of the State.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
If Hobbes is individualist, why is the state absolute?
Because he thinks only an undivided power can bind those individuals. Individualism of origin does not mean individualism of outcome.
-
Is Hobbes a liberal?
He is a founder of modern individual rights and consent, and an opponent of limited government and divided sovereignty. The mix is his signature.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Systems Approach. -
2022 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism. -
2022 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
"Revolution in Permanence". -
2022 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Bases of Power. -
2022 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Locke's Social Contract. -
2022 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Factors like community, culture and nation weaken the hegemony of neo-liberalism today. Discuss -
2022 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"Equality of estates caused equality of power, and equality of power is liberty." Comment -
2021 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Tools of legitimation of the State.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
With reference to Peruvian experience of planning and economic development, examine how the early phase of economic planning in India has laid the foundation for future development
Political Theory
Peru’s mid-century development mixed export oligarchy with a radical military-planning interlude under Velasco, then crisis and neoliberal reversal. Indian early planning under the Planning Commission and the Mahalanobis strategy built public industry, technical education, and a durable idea of state-led structural change. India’s process was parliamentary and federally argued; Peru’s surge was corporatist and more easily dismantled. Critiques of the Hindu rate of growth and of controls do not cancel the foundational industrial and administrative capacity. The comparison shows that planning founds future development when institutions outlast a single regime, which India did more than Peru.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The decision to conduct Population Census-2027 has reopened the debate on consultation in India. Discuss its various aspects
Political Theory
Census 2027 is a political institution because it will affect delimitation, finance, and recognition after a delayed 2021 count. Federal consultation is required in spirit even though Census is a Union subject, especially for southern states that fear seat and fund losses. Caste enumeration and the NPR reopen debates on identity, privacy, and citizenship trust. Women’s parliamentary reservation is legally tied to post-census delimitation, so consultation on the formula is part of the census debate. A digital method needs consultation on exclusion and data security, or legibility will be mistaken for consent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Political Theory
Regional parties have been decisive vehicles for bringing historically disadvantaged groups into governing politics, not only into vote banks. The BSP made Dalit bahujan power executive in Uttar Pradesh; the DMK mainstreamed non-Brahmin and Tamil publics through Dravidian organisation and welfare. TMC incorporated rural poor, women, and minorities as the decisive Bengal coalition after the Left. TRS/BRS turned a backward region’s dignity claim into a state elite; AAP incorporated urban and agrarian users of public services; JMM brought Adivasi demands into Jharkhand’s party government. Jaffrelot’s silent revolution and Yadav’s democratic upsurges describe this incorporation, which creates new elites even as it opens the system.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.