Revision summary
Feminists treat the state as gendered, not as a neutral referee. Pateman locates a sexual contract beneath the social contract. MacKinnon reads law as organised around male power. The public–private split hid household domination from liberal theory. Indian Article 15, Vishaka, and the 73rd Amendment are incomplete replies.
Model answer
Introduction
Feminist critique treats the state as a gendered power, not a neutral umpire. Carole Pateman and Catharine MacKinnon argue that public authority has been built on men’s private command over women.
Body
The claim
- Pateman’s sexual contract sits under the social contract: brothers make a public fraternity while keeping women in the household.
- MacKinnon reads the state through male dominance: rape law, workplace rules, and the public–private split protect a sexed hierarchy.
- Liberal night-watchman talk, from Locke to a thin reading of J. S. Mill, treated the family as pre-political, which hid unpaid care and domestic violence.
- Marxist feminism adds that the state also reproduces cheap social reproduction for capital.
Indian bearing
- Article 15, Vishaka guidelines, and later workplace-harassment law show the state being forced to enter the “private”.
- Reservation of seats for women in panchayats after the 73rd Amendment is a partial opening of office, not the end of sarpanch-pati practice.
- The critique does not say that every statute is simply “men”. It says that legitimacy, force, and welfare still assume a male citizen unless redesigned.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Feminist critique] --> P[Pateman sexual contract] F --> M[MacKinnon male dominance] F --> PR[Public-private split] ST[State] --> PR
Conclusion
Feminist critique of the state, in Pateman and MacKinnon, is that public power rests on a sexual contract and male dominance. Indian rights and panchayat quotas have begun to rewrite that bargain. They have not yet made the state sex-neutral.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Affirmative action.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Do feminists want to abolish the state?
Some radical strands are sceptical of the state. Liberal and socialist feminists more often demand a reconstructed rights-and-welfare state.
-
Is Mill a feminist of the state?
J. S. Mill argued for women’s suffrage and against legal subjection. Pateman still says his liberalism left the household undertheorised.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
What is the Marxist and liberal approach towards the state? On what grounds the theoretical differences between them are premised? Explain -
2024 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Pluralist theory of State. -
2023 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Eurocentrism is both the target and the motive force of the post-colonial political theory. Discuss -
2022 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine the liberal theory of State in contemporary politics
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Affirmative action.
Equality
Affirmative action gives extra access to historically excluded groups. Ambedkar treated it as necessary for equal citizenship in a caste order. Champakam Dorairajan forced the First Amendment and Article 15(4). Mandal and Indra Sawhney framed OBC policy and the creamy layer. Jaffrelot shows the same tool as a political identity, not only a welfare device.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Equality of outcome as a political idea.
Equality
Equality of outcome is a political test of actual conditions, not of legal form alone. Marx’s classless society is a strong version; Ambedkar’s status equality is a civic version. Rawls allows unequal outcomes under the difference principle. Hayek and Nozick reject patterned end-states as unfreedom. Indian Parts III and IV mix rights with a drive toward less unequal results.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Tools of legitimation of the State.
Political Theory
Legitimation makes obedience look rightful, not only forced. Weber listed tradition, charisma, and legal-rational authority. Easton treats support as a system input; Gramsci adds consent in civil society. Elections, Model Code, Kesavananda review, and welfare are Indian tools. Emergency showed the cost when coercion replaces those tools.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.