Revision summary
Rashika’s clash is a real file, a sick child and social duty on one Sunday. Work ethic is devotion to genuine public urgency, not unlimited availability. The Conduct Rules require duty and integrity; they do not require a false excuse or the erasure of a child. Her sound option is triage, shared drafting, honest timing and cancelling only what can wait. The organisation must roster Sunday work, build deputies, and use flexible hours already known to service practice, not invent a statute.
Model answer
Introduction
Rashika is a Joint Secretary whose Sunday is claimed by an urgent note, a sick child and social duties she cannot simply cancel. The case is about the limit of work ethic, not about a saint who never goes home.
Body
Stakeholders
- Rashika, her sick child, and the family members who share care.
- The minister or secretary who wants the Sunday note.
- Colleagues who will inherit the file if she steps back, and those who already work unsocial hours.
- Citizens waiting on the policy in that note.
- The organisation, whose culture either burns people or plans depth.
Ethical issues
- Work ethic in public service is real: the Union’s files do not follow a private calendar when a disaster or a Cabinet deadline is live.
- Unlimited work ethic is not a virtue. It treats the officer as a tool, neglects a sick child, and in time produces errors and quiet resentment.
- Gendered expectation is an issue: Joint Secretary mothers are still more often asked to prove commitment by disappearing from the home.
- Honesty toward the minister matters; so does honesty toward the child who needs a parent, not a video call from a corridor.
- The Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 require devotion to duty and do not require the erasure of family life. They also do not create a right to ignore a genuine emergency file.
Reasonable limits of work ethics
- A genuine, time-bound public interest — a disaster, a court deadline, a Cabinet note that cannot slip — can claim a Sunday.
- A habit of Sunday notes because the office cannot plan, or because a superior enjoys late control, is not public interest.
- Reasonable limit means: the officer remains contactable; a deputy is trained; rest and care duties are scheduled; and “urgent” is a scarce word.
- Work ethic includes saying in time that the note needs two more hands, not performing martyrdom and then missing a fact.
Options for Rashika
- Option 1: Ignore the child and the social duty, finish the note alone all Sunday.
- Merit: the file moves.
- Demerit: the child is left, error risk rises, and the organisation learns that it can always dump on her.
- Option 2: Ignore the note without information, citing family.
- Merit: the child is seen.
- Demerit: if the deadline is real, citizens and the minister are failed, and she looks unavailable without a plan.
- Option 3: Send a false medical excuse for herself.
- Merit: none that ethics can use.
- Demerit: a lie, which the Conduct Rules treat as unbecoming, and it solves nothing for the next Sunday.
- Option 4: Triage. Confirm whether the note is truly Sunday-critical. If it is, share the draft with a trusted colleague, attend the child’s acute need in blocks, cancel only the social event that can be cancelled, and tell the superior the honest time of delivery.
- Merit: duty and care both appear in the day.
- Demerit: she will still be tired; that is the honest cost of a real emergency, not of a fake one.
What the organisation should do
- Define genuine after-hours work in writing: disaster, court, Cabinet, not every “please see”.
- Build bench strength so a Joint Secretary is not the only person who can write the note.
- Use flexible hours and staggered presence where the Department of Personnel and Training instructions and the organisation’s own orders already allow, rather than inventing a new “work-life Act”.
- Supervisors should not treat a sick child as a loyalty test. The Conduct Rules ask for integrity and courtesy, not for a parent to hide an ill child.
- Provide a known roster for Sunday duty and compensatory rest, as many organised services already do in principle.
- Do not issue a fake rule or a poster that promises balance while the minister still rings only one name at 6 a.m.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD SUN[Sunday note] --> TRI[Is it genuine urgency] TRI --> SHARE[Share draft and roster] CHILD[Sick child] --> CARE[Blocks of care] SHARE --> DEL[Honest delivery time] CARE --> DEL LIE[False excuse] --> FAIL[Conduct failure]
Conclusion
- Work ethic has a limit: real public urgency, not a culture of Sunday theatre. Rashika should triage, share the file, tell the truth about time, and not lie. The organisation should roster, deepen the bench, and use flexible hours that already exist in service practice.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. Briefly describe at least four laws that have been enacted by the. Government with respect to providing a healthy, safe and equitable working environment for women.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q10). View answer →
-
May Rashika refuse every Sunday file as a right?
No. A real Cabinet or disaster note can claim the day. She may refuse a culture of fake urgency, and she must offer a plan, not a vanished phone.
-
Is there a special law that guarantees Joint Secretaries flexible Sundays?
No such special Act should be invented in the answer. Use Conduct Rules, existing flexible-hour practice, rostering and compensatory rest.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are working as an executive in a nationalised bank for several years. One day one of your close colleagues tells you that her father is suffering from heart disease and needs surgery immediately to survive. She also tells you that she has no insurance and the operation will cost about Rs. 10 lakh. You are also aware of the fact that her husband is no more and that she is from a lower middle class family. You are empathetic about her situation. However, apart from expressing your sympathy, you do not have the resources to find her. A few weeks later, you ask her about the well-being of her father and she informs you about his successful surgery and that he is recovering. She then confides in you that the bank manager was kind enough to facilitate the release of Rs. 10 lakh from a dormant account of someone to pay for the operation with a promise that it should be confidential and be repaid at the earliest. She has already started paying it back and will continue to do so until it is all returned. -
2023 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A landslide occurred in the middle of the night on 20thJuly, 2023 in a remote mountain hamlet, approximately 60 kilometres from Uttarkashi. The landslide was caused by torrential rains and has resulted in large-scale destruction of property and life. You, as District Magistrate of that area, have rushed to the spot with a team of doctors, NGOs, media and police along with numerous support staff to oversee the rescue operations. A man came running to you with a request for urgent medical help for his pregnant wife who is in labour and is losing blood. You directed your medical team to examine his wife. They return and convey to you that this woman needs blood transfusion immediately. Upon enquiry, you come to know that a few blood collection bags and blood group test kits are available in the ambulance accompanying your team. Few people of your team have already volunteered to donate blood. Being a physician who has graduated from AIIMS, you know that blood for transfusion needs to be procured only through a recognized blood bank. Your team members are divided on this issue; some favour transfusion, while some others oppose it. The doctors in the team are ready to facilitate the delivery provided they are not penalized for transfusion. Now you are in a dilemma. Your professional training emphasizes on prioritising service to humanity and saving lives of individuals. -
2023 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Briefly describe at least four laws that have been enacted by the. Government with respect to providing a healthy, safe and equitable working environment for women. -
2023 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Vinod is an honest and sincere IAS officer. Recently, he has taken over as Managing Director of the State Road Transport Corporation, his sixth transfer in the past three years. His peers acknowledge his vast knowledge, affability and uprightness. The Chairman of the State Road Transport Corporation is a powerful politician and is very close to the Chief Minister. Vinod comes to know about many alleged irregularities of the Corporation and the high-handedness of the Chairman in financial matters. A Board Member of the Corporation belonging to the Opposition Party meets Vinod and hands over a few documents along with a video recording in which the Chairman appears to be demanding bribe for placing a huge order for the supply of QMR tyres. Vinod recollects the Chairman expediting clearing of pending bills of QMR tyres. Vinod confronts the Board Member as to why he is shying away from exposing the Chairman with the so-called solid proof he has with him. The member informs him that the Chairman refuses to yield to his threats. He adds that Vinod may earn recognition and public support if he himself exposes the Chairman. Further, he tells Vinod that once his party comes to power, Vinod's professional growth would be assured. Vinod is aware that he may be penalized if he exposes the Chairman and further be transferred to a distant place. He knows that the Opposition. Party stands a better chance of coming to power in the forthcoming elections. However, he also realizes that the Board Member is trying to use him for his own political gains. -
2023 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. In the light of the above case, comment upon the ethical issues that may arise due to the politicization of bureaucracy. -
2022 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Prabhat was working as Vice President (Marketing) at Sterling Electric Ltd., a reputed multinational company. But presently the company was passing through the difficult times as the sales were continuously showing downward trend in the last two quarters. His division, which hitherto had been a major revenue contributor to the company's financial health, was now desperately trying to procure some big government order for them. But their best efforts did not yield any positive success or breakthrough. His was a professional company and his local bosses were under pressure from their London-based HO to show some positive results. In the last performance review meeting taken by the Executive Director (India Head), he was reprimanded for his poor performance. He assured them that his division is working on a special contract from the Ministry of Defence for a secret installation near Gwalior and tender is being submitted shortly. He was under extreme pressure and he was deeply perturbed. What aggravated the situation further was a warning from the top that if the deal is not clinched in favour of the company, his division might have to be closed and he may have to quit his lucrative job. There was another dimension which was causing him deep mental torture and agony. This pertained to his personal precarious financial health. He was a single earner in the family with two school-college going children and his old ailing mother. The heavy expenditure on education and medical was causing a big strain to his monthly pay packet. Regular EMI for housing loan taken from bank unavoidable and any default would render him liable for severe legal action. In the above backdrop, he was hoping for some miracle to happen. There was sudden turn of events. His Secretary informed that a gentleman Subhas Verma wanted to see him as he was interested in the position of Manager which was to be filled by him in the company. He further brought to his notice that his CV has been received through the office of the Minister of Defence. During interview of the candidate-Subhash Verma, he found him technically sound, resourceful and experienced marketeer. He seemed to be well-conversant with tendering procedures and having knack of follow-up and liaising in this regard Prabhat felt that he was better choice than the rest of the candidates who were recently interviewed by him in the last few days. Subhash Verma also indicated that he was in possession of the copies of the bid documents that the Unique Electronics Ltd. would be submitting the next day to the Defence Ministry for their tender. He offered to hand over those documents subject to his employment in the company on suitable terms and conditions. He made it clear that in the process, the Sterling Electric Ltd. could outbid their rival company and get the bid and hefty Defence Ministry order. He indicated that it will be win-win situation for both-him and the company. Prabhat was absolutely stunned. It was a mixed feeling of shock and thrill. He was uncomfortable and perspiring. If accepted, all his problems would vanish instantly and he may be rewarded for securing the much awaited tender and thereby boosting company's sales and financial health. He was in a fix as to the future course of action. He was wonder-struck at the guts of Subhash Verma in having surreptitiously removing his own company papers and offering to the rival company for a job. Being an experienced person, he was examining the pros and cons of the proposal/situation and he asked him to come the next day. (a) Discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Prabhat in the above situation. (c) Which of the above would be the most appropriate for Prabhat and why? -
2022 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Ramesh is State Civil Services Officer who got the opportunity of getting posted to the capital of a border State after rendering 20 years of service. Ramesh's mother has recently been detected cancer and has been admitted in the leading cancer hospital of the city. His two adolescent children have also got admission in one of the best public schools of the town. After settling down in his appointment as Director in the Home Department of the State, Ramesh got confidential report through intelligence sources that illegal migrants are infiltrating in the State from the neighbouring country. He decided to personally carry out surprise check of the border posts along with his Home Department team. To his surprise, he caught red-handed two families of 12 members infiltrated with the connivance of the security personnel at the border posts. On further inquiry and investigation, it was found that after the migrants from neighbouring country infiltrate, their documentation like Aadhaar Card, Ration Card and Voter Card are also forged and they are made to settle down in a particular area of the State. Ramesh prepared the detailed and comprehensive report and submitted to the Additional Secretary of the State. However, he has summoned by the Additional Home Secretary after a week and was instructed to withdraw the report. The Additional Home Secretary informed Ramesh that the report submitted by him has not been appreciated by the higher authorities. He further cautioned him that if he fails to withdraw the confidential ort, he will not only be posted out from the prestigious appointment from the State capital but his further promotion which is due in near future will also get in jeopardy. (a) What are the options available to Ramesh as the Director of the Home Department of the bordering State? (b) What option should Ramesh adopt and why? (c) Critically evaluate each of the options. (d) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ramesh? (e) What policy measures would you suggest to combat the menace of infiltration of illegal migrants from the neighbouring country? -
2022 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. The Supreme Court has banned mining in the Aravalli Hills to stop degradation the forest cover and to maintain ecological balance. However, the stone mining to still prevalent in the border district of the affected State with connivance of certain corrupt forest officials and politicians. Young and dynamic SP who was recently posted in the affected district promised to himself to stop this menace. In one of his surprise checks with his team, he found loaded truck with stone trying to escape the mining area. He tried to stop the truck but the truck driver overrun the police officer, killing him on the spot and thereafter managed to flee. Police filed FIR but no breakthrough was achieved in the case for almost three months. Ashok who was the Investigative Journalist working with leading TV channel, suo moto started investigating the case. Within one month, Ashok got breakthrough by interacting with local people, stone mining masia and government officials. He prepared his investigative story and presented to the CMD of the TV channel. He exposed in his investigative report the complete nexus of stone mafia working with blessing of corrupt police and civil officials and politicians. The politician who was involved in the mafia was no one else but local MLA who was considered to be very close to the Chief Minister. After going through the investigative report, the CMD advised Ashok to drop the idea of making the story public through electronic media. He informed that the local MLA was not only the relative of the owner of the TV channel but also had unofficially 20 percent share in the channel. The CMD further informed Ashok that his further promotion and hike in pay will be taken care of in addition the soft loan of 10 lakhs which he has taken from the TV channel for his son's chronic disease will be suitably adjusted if he hands over the investigative report to him. (a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation? (b) Critically evaluate/examine each of the options identified by Ashok. (c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok? (d) Which of the options, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Ashok to adopt and why? (e)In the above scenario, what type of training would you suggest for police officers posted to such districts where stone mining illegal activities are rampant?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What do you understand by 'moral integrity' and 'professional efficiency in the context of corporate governance in India? Illustrate with suitable examples. (b) International aid is an accepted form of helping resource-challenged nations. Comment on ethics in contemporary international aid. Support your answer with suitable examples.
Ethics in Public Administration
Moral integrity in a company is truthful accounts and refusal of promoter capture. Professional efficiency is competent, lawful running of the firm so value is real. Satyam showed that apparent efficiency without integrity is fraud; the Companies Act, 2013 strengthened independent directors and audit. Independent directors work only if they can dissent and resign rather than decorate the board. International aid is justified as solidarity and fails when it is tied, coercive or delayed until the donor is safe. Ethical aid needs ownership, transparency, climate justice and accountability to recipients.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) "Corruption is the manifestation of the failure of core values in the society." In your opinion, what measures can be adopted to uplift the core values in the society? (b) In the context of work environment, differentiate between 'coercion and undue influence' with suitable examples.
Probity in Governance
Corruption is private gain from entrusted power and shows that honesty, impartiality and duty have failed. Uplift needs family and school, leadership example, e-systems that cut discretion, and statutes that protect whistle-blowers and punish graft. Coercion is forcing a person by threat of harm such as transfer, violence or a withheld bill. Undue influence is unfair advantage taken from a dominating or fiduciary relation without an open threat. Both appear at work; POSH and Conduct Rules cover the quiet pressure as well as the shout.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS IV · 10 marks
Given below are three quotations of great thinkers. What do each of the quotations convey to you in the present test? (a) "The simplest arts of kindness are by far more powerful than a thousand heads bowing in prayer."- Mahatma Gandhi (b) To awaken the people, it is the women who must be awakened. Once she is on the move, the family moves, the village moves, the nation moves". - Jawaharlal Nehru (c) "Do not hate anybody, because that hatred that comes out from you must, in the long run, come back to you. If you love, that love will me back to you, completing the circle- Swami Vivekananda.
Moral Thinkers and Philosophers
Gandhi ranks a simple kind act above a show of prayer; public piety without a working counter fails the test. Nehru ties national awakening to women’s education, safety, voice and economic freedom. A household or scheme that ignores women is not development. Vivekananda warns that hatred returns as social heat; fraternity and lawful justice break that circle. The three quotes together ask for service, gender justice and refusal of communal revenge.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.