Revision summary
Conduct rules, vigilance, RTI, media and stronger statutes have worked where records exist and e-payment killed the counter. They are weak against collusion, election finance and slow trials, and can freeze honest officers if misused. Corruption continues because desperate demand still meets discretionary supply. Better strategies shrink discretion, speed fair trials, audit assets, clean political funding and change social honour. Example at the top and unsold postings matter more than one more pledge.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
India has piled tools against graft. The tools are not empty. They have also not ended the market in files. The question is why the pile is not enough, and what else must sit beside it.
Body
(a) Evaluate the measures
- Codes of conduct (Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968) name integrity, gifts and unbecoming conduct. They work when inquiries are real. They fail when a violation is rewarded with a better posting.
- Vigilance cells and the Central Vigilance Commission create a specialist eye. They have caught traps and big files. They can also become a fear machine that freezes honest signatures, or a parking place for inconvenient officers.
- The Right to Information Act, 2005 has exposed ration theft, muster fraud and admissions scams. Effectiveness is high where records exist and Commissions are strong; it is weak where files are “not traceable” or applicants are threatened.
- Active media has made some scams unsustainable and has also run trials by headline. It deters the visible thief more than the quiet collusion.
- Legal strengthening — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (and later amendment), Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, money-laundering law — raises the formal cost of crime. Trials that last a decade lower that cost again.
- Overall: these measures have reduced some open counter-bribes, especially where e-payment killed the clerk’s window. They have not broken political-business collusion, election-time cash, or small everyday speed money where the citizen is desperate.
- Justification: corruption continues because demand (a citizen who must get a licence this week) and supply (discretion plus weak punishment) still meet. Tools that attack only the clerk leave the patron.
(b) More effective strategies
- Shrink discretion: e-procurement, faceless assessment, online permissions with published criteria, and direct benefit transfer so that a rupee does not pass through ten palms.
- Fast, fair trials for corruption, with specialised courts that actually sit, so that the Act is not a scarecrow.
- Protect whistle-blowers in practice, not only on paper; punish the leaking of an identity.
- Political funding transparency and a real ceiling that is enforced; much public corruption is the recovery of election cost.
- Social norm: stop celebrating the fixer as efficient. School and training must treat a stolen rupee as shame.
- Random third-party audit of high-risk works, geotagged assets, and social audit as in MGNREGA, with police follow-up, not a closed meeting.
- Blacklisting of firms that bribe, and corporate liability that the 2018 amendment already points toward.
- Rotate and declare: property returns that are verified, not filed and forgotten; conflict-of-interest recusal that is public.
- Integrity in recruitment and transfers: if the posting itself is sold, no code at the desk will hold.
- Technology plus analog justice: a camera that can be switched off is not a strategy. Pair digital trails with independent prosecution and a citizen who can reach a help-line that answers.
- Leadership example still outperforms a new circular. A minister who lives simply and does not call about a tender changes the price of honesty.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD TOOLS[Codes CVC RTI media law] --> DENT[Some exposure and less open bribe] TOOLS --> GAP[Collusion slow trials demand] STRAT[Less discretion fast courts clean funding norms] --> CUT[Lower corruption]
Conclusion
Codes, vigilance, RTI, media and law have dented open petty graft and exposed some large thefts. They fail where discretion, slow trials and political money remain. The next strategy is less cash at the window, faster punishment, cleaner politics, and a culture that does not clap for the fixer.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
If so many institutions exist, is the citizen wrong to still complain?
No. Institutions on paper are not the same as a convicted powerful person. The complaint is data, not ingratitude.
-
Will more laws end corruption?
Another section without faster trials and less discretion will not. Law is one tool in the list, not the whole list.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS IV · 10 marks · Solution
A business house is working on a project that could displace a forest community from their habitat. As the administrative officer of that district, what ethical challenges are you likely to face?
Probity in Governance
This GS4 10-marker examines the ethical dilemmas faced by a district administrator dealing with industrial displacement of a forest community. The answer navigates the core tension between economic development and social justice, highlighting stakeholder conflicts such as corporate pressure versus tribal rights, the paradox of legal compliance versus moral duty, and personal integrity under administrative coercion. It incorporates a structured Mermaid flowchart mapping out the stakeholder dilemma and concludes with a balanced administrative approach upholding constitutional empathy and statutory safeguards like PESA and FRA.
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS IV · 10 marks · Solution
Owing to paucity of time, a university professor generates a Ph.D. evaluation report using Artificial Intelligence and submits it with some modifications. Discuss this from the perspective of accountability and integrity.
Probity in Governance
This GS4 ethics case study examines the dilemma of a university professor using AI to generate a Ph.D. evaluation report due to time constraints. It analyses the failure of professional accountability in delegating core academic judgment to an automated tool. The response evaluates the breach of intellectual integrity, the erosion of institutional trust in research degrees, and outlines a principled course of action balancing urgency with ethical duty.
Q6 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 10 marks · Solution
(a) It is said that for an ethical work culture, there must be code of ethics in place in every organisation. To ensure value-based and compliance-based work culture, what suitable measures would you adopt in your work place? (b) India is an emerging economic power of the world as it has recently secured the status of fourth largest economy of the world as per IMF projection. However, it has been observed that in some sectors, allocated funds remain either under-utilised or misutilised. What specific measures would you recommend for ensuring accountability in this regard to stop leakages and gaining the status of third largest economy of the world in near future?
Probity in Governance
A code of ethics states values; a code of conduct states forbidden acts; both need leaders who obey them. Whistle protection, rotation, checked assets and small consistent punishments build culture. India’s fourth-largest-economy rank (IMF) sits beside under-used and stolen public money in some schemes. PFMS, outcome budgets, social audit, GeM and CAG follow-up are the accountability kit. Growth to third place is ethical only if the ladder is not stolen from the poor.