Revision summary
NITI Aayog’s Fiscal Health Index, 2025 scores major States on revenue, spending quality, deficit and debt. Odisha led the first public ranking; rich States were not automatically healthy. The index is a dashboard for comparison, not a substitute for the Finance Commission. Sunshine, markets and carefully designed extra borrowing room can reward prudence. It must not punish poverty or hide off-budget debt if it is to stay honest.
Model answer
Introduction
- A State’s budget can look large and still be unhealthy: borrowed money spent on salaries, own tax left uncollected, capital works starved. NITI Aayog’s Fiscal Health Index tries to put that story into one comparable score for major States. It is a dashboard, not a punishment. Used well, it can shame waste and praise States that tax fairly and invest.
Body
What the index measures
The Fiscal Health Index, 2025 (NITI Aayog, released in early 2025) scores eighteen large States on pillars that typically include quality of expenditure (how much goes to capital and development rather than only interest and wages), revenue mobilisation (own tax and non-tax, GST effort), fiscal prudence (deficit relative to GSDP), and debt index / sustainability (debt-GSDP, interest burden). Odisha ranked at the top in that first public edition; several high-income States did less well than their fame, which is the point of a composite: size of GSDP is not health.
A student should treat the exact rank as a snapshot. The method matters more. An index that rewards own-revenue stops a State from living only on Union transfers. An index that rewards capital outlay stops a State from calling every loan “development”. An index that flags guarantees and off-budget borrowing (if the method is honest) stops creative accounting.
How it can push prudence
Sunshine is the first nudge. A chief minister dislikes a public red mark beside a neighbour. Markets and rating agencies already watch State bonds; an official index can align that gaze. The Union can link some challenge funds or extra borrowing room (within FRBM) to improvement, though the Finance Commission remains the constitutional distributor and should not be replaced by a NITI league table. Legislatures can use the pillars in budget debates instead of only the size of a farm-loan waiver.
- Limits: States differ in mineral luck and GST base. A coal State can look “prudent” while a poor hill State looks “weak”. The index must normalise and must not become a stick against welfare that is actually investment in people. Used as a learning tool — peer review of property tax, power-subsidy reform, capital-budget execution — it encourages sustainable policy: deficits that buy assets, debt that a future tax base can service.
The encouragement works when the score is transparent, yearly, and hard to game.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FHI[Fiscal Health Index] --> R[Own revenue] FHI --> Q[Quality of spend] FHI --> D[Deficit and debt] FHI --> N[Nudge: sunshine peer review]
Conclusion
The Fiscal Health Index compares States on revenue effort, spending quality, deficits and debt. Public ranks can push prudence if they reward own tax and capital works, not if they only punish poor States or replace the Finance Commission.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Distinguish between Capital Budget and Revenue Budget. Explain the components of both these Budgets.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q2). View answer →
-
Does a low FHI mean a State should cut all welfare?
No. It should raise own revenue and protect capital and human investment, not starve the poor to look prudent for a year.
-
Is FHI in the Constitution?
No. It is a NITI tool. Article 280 Finance Commissions remain the legal path for tax devolution.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q2 · GS III · 10 marks
Distinguish between Capital Budget and Revenue Budget. Explain the components of both these Budgets. -
2020 · Q12 · GS III · 15 marks
Explain the rationale behind the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act of 2017. How has COVID-19 impacted the GST compensation fund and created new federal tensions? -
2019 · Q1 · GS III · 10 marks
Enumerate the indirect taxes which have been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST) in India. Also, comment on the revenue implications of the GST introduced in India since July 2017. -
2019 · Q12 · GS III · 15 marks
The public expenditure management is a challenge to the Government of India in context of budget making during the post liberalization period. Clarify it. -
2018 · Q2 · GS III · 10 marks
Comment on the important changes introduced in respect of the Long term Capital Gains Tax (LCGT) and Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) in the Union Budget for 2018-2019. (150 Words, 10 Marks). -
2017 · Q11 · GS III · 15 marks
One of the intended objectives of Union Budget 2017-18 is to 'transform, energize and clean India'. Analyse the measures proposed in the Budget 2017-18 to achieve the objective. -
2016 · Q2 · GS III · 12 marks
Women empowerment in India needs gender budgeting. What are the requirements and status of gender budgeting in the Indian context?
More from this topic
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS III · 10 marks
Distinguish between Capital Budget and Revenue Budget. Explain the components of both these Budgets.
Government Budgeting
Revenue Budget covers tax and non-tax receipts and spending that does not create assets. Capital Budget covers borrowings, disinvestment, loan recoveries, and asset-creating outlays. Salaries, interest, and subsidies sit on the revenue side; roads, equity, and loans sit on the capital side. A revenue deficit means borrowing to consume, not only to invest. FRBM reading needs both splits, not a single deficit number.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS III · 15 marks
Explain the rationale behind the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act of 2017. How has COVID-19 impacted the GST compensation fund and created new federal tensions?
Government Budgeting
GST compensation was the political insurance for States that subsumed VAT and related taxes. The 2017 Act promised a 14 per cent CAGR over a 2015-16 base for about five years, funded by cess. COVID crashed GST and cess inflows, so the fund could not meet the formula from current cess. The 2020 conflict was borrowing windows versus a Union Consolidated Fund bailout. The 14 per cent figure was a time-bound statutory compact, not a permanent constitutional grant.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 15 marks
The public expenditure management is a challenge to the Government of India in context of budget making during the post liberalization period. Clarify it.
Government Budgeting
After 1991 the budget, not industrial licensing, became the State’s main economic tool. Committed interest, subsidies, defence, and pensions leave little discretionary room. GST transition and a 42 per cent Finance Commission share tightened Union receipts relative to political demands. Off-budget borrowing and March-rush spending weaken FRBM as a true constraint. Better management is DBT, PFMS, a medium-term capex plan, and a full debt statement.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.