Revision summary
IFS combines crops with livestock, trees or fish so waste becomes an input. It sustains output through soil organic matter, farm ponds, and year-round income. RAD, NMSA, RKVY and ICAR models are the public frame. PM-KISAN, PMFBY and PMKSY make the mix bankable and less risky. Limits are capital, extension, and markets; IFS is not a full substitute for procurement and water reform.
Model answer
Introduction
An Integrated Farming System (IFS) puts crops, animals, trees, fish or poultry on the same holding so waste from one activity feeds another. ICAR (including the Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research) promotes it as a path to steady output on small plots. It sustains production when nutrient cycles and income diversify; it does not replace water, credit or markets.
Body
What IFS is
- A typical IFS mix is cereal–pulse–oilseed with dairy or small ruminants, a kitchen garden, agroforestry, and, where water allows, a pond for fish or ducks.
- Residues become fodder or compost; dung becomes manure or biogas; pond silt returns to the field. The farm is designed as a loop, not as a single monsoon gamble on one crop.
- Rainfed Area Development under the National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture, Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana, and State IFS models (Kerala homestead, eastern rice–fish) are the public vehicles. NITI Aayog’s doubling-farmers’-income work treats diversification as a core lever.
How it helps sustain production
- Soil and nutrients: on-farm manure and residue cut the urea-only habit that Soil Health Card data still flag. Organic matter holds moisture in dry months.
- Water: a farm pond and trees raise in-situ conservation; this pairs with Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana micro-irrigation rather than flooding one paddy crop.
- Risk: if one crop fails, milk, eggs, fish or fodder trees still pay. That is why IFS sits well with Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana — insurance covers the crop slice; livestock and trees cover the rest.
- Income and labour: year-round work on a small holding reduces distress migration and uses family labour that a single harvest cannot occupy. PM-KISAN cash can fund a first cow, pond or sapling if extension follows.
- Nutrition and ecology: household vegetables and fish improve diets; trees and hedges support pollinators and cut wind erosion.
How far — the limits
- IFS needs knowledge, start-up capital, and veterinary or fishery support. A poor holding without a road or a milk route cannot sell the extra produce.
- It is not a substitute for MSP, storage, or groundwater reform where paddy–wheat is locked by procurement.
- Scaling is through Farmer Producer Organisations, KVKs and cluster demonstration, not through a slogan on every 0.5 hectare without water.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IFS[Integrated Farming System] --> C[Crops] IFS --> L[Livestock fish trees] C --> N[Residue and manure loop] L --> N N --> S[Steadier yield and soil] S --> I[Income with PM-KISAN PMFBY] I --> P[Sustained production]
Conclusion
IFS helps sustain agricultural production by cycling nutrients, spreading risk, and using water and labour through the year. It goes far on small and rainfed farms when PMKSY, PMFBY, PM-KISAN and KVK advice sit behind the mix. It cannot, by itself, fix a missing market or an exhausted aquifer.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elaborate the impact of National Watershed Project in increasing agricultural production from water-stressed areas.
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is IFS only organic farming?
No. It is a mix of enterprises. It usually cuts chemical excess through manure loops, but it can still use recommended fertiliser.
-
Can IFS replace MSP for wheat and paddy?
No. It diversifies income. Where procurement locks the cropping pattern, IFS remains a supplement unless markets for milk, fish and horticulture work.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q14 · GS III · 15 marks
What is Integrated Farming System ? How is it helpful to small and marginal farmers in India ?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
Enumerate the indirect taxes which have been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST) in India. Also, comment on the revenue implications of the GST introduced in India since July 2017.
Government Budgeting
GST from 1 July 2017 subsumed central excise, service tax, CVD, SAD, VAT, CST, entry tax, luxury tax and related cesses. Petroleum products, alcohol for human consumption and electricity stay outside. Compensation Act 2017 gave States a 14 per cent floor over the 2015–16 base for five years. Early collections were uneven; later compliance rails raised monthly GST. Revenue will thicken if slabs shrink and petroleum enters GST in a phased way.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
Do you agree with the view that steady GDP growth and low inflation have left the Indian economy in good shape? Give reasons in support of your arguments.
Indian Economy
CPI near 4 per cent under the MPC was a real gain after 2016. A stretch of 7–8 per cent GDP did not survive as strength once 2018–19 slowed. PLFS unemployment near 6.1 per cent showed job-thin growth. IL&FS and NBFCs, weak capex, and rural demand were the missing tests. PM-KISAN and investment revival were needed; two headlines were not enough.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
Elaborate the impact of National Watershed Project in increasing agricultural production from water-stressed areas.
Indian Economy
Neeranchal backs IWMP, now WDC-PMKSY, as the national watershed effort. Structures slow runoff, cut soil loss, and recharge wells in rainfed blocks. The production gain is cropping intensity and a less risky kharif, plus fodder. MGNREGA and PMKSY convergence turn a trench into a second crop. Borewell over-extraction and unmaintained structures cap the impact.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.