Revision summary
CPI near 4 per cent under the MPC was a real gain after 2016. A stretch of 7–8 per cent GDP did not survive as strength once 2018–19 slowed. PLFS unemployment near 6.1 per cent showed job-thin growth. IL&FS and NBFCs, weak capex, and rural demand were the missing tests. PM-KISAN and investment revival were needed; two headlines were not enough.
Model answer
Introduction
Headline GDP growth in the mid-2010s looked steady, and consumer inflation after the 2016 flexible inflation-targeting law sat inside the Reserve Bank of India band of 4 per cent plus or minus 2. Those two numbers are necessary for macro health. They are not sufficient. By 2018–19 investment, jobs and rural demand were already signalling stress.
Body
What the two indicators did show
- Inflation targeting, with the Monetary Policy Committee, anchored CPI near the 4 per cent target for several years, which protected real wages from a 2013-style spike and cut the old fiscal-monetary clash.
- Growth in the 7–8 per cent zone for a stretch raised India’s weight in world GDP and kept fiscal math easier than in a recession.
- Low inflation plus growth is the textbook soft-landing story. It is why some commentators said the economy was in good shape.
Why that view is too thin
- Growth slowed into 2018–19 and 2019: auto sales, Index of Industrial Production, and private gross fixed capital formation weakened. A high past average does not mean the latest quarter is healthy.
- Unemployment in the Periodic Labour Force Survey (2017–18) was reported near 6.1 per cent, the highest in decades of comparable NSS series. Jobless growth is not a good shape for a young country.
- The IL&FS default (2018) and NBFC freeze showed that cheap CPI inflation can sit beside a credit crunch in shadow banking. Banks were still cleaning non-performing assets.
- Rural distress: weak wage growth, stressed Mandi prices for several crops, and household demand for two-wheelers and FMCG slowed. PM-KISAN (2019) was itself an admission that farm incomes needed a cash floor.
- External and investment climate: a high current-account comfort from cheap oil can mask weak export competitiveness. Make in India had not yet lifted manufacturing’s share of GVA toward the stated 25 per cent.
- NITI Aayog and Economic Survey both warned that potential output needs investment, not only a GDP print. Twin balance-sheet stress had not fully cleared.
Balanced position
- One should not agree that steady GDP and low inflation had left the economy in good shape. They left the macro anchors in better shape than in 2013. The real economy — jobs, credit, and rural demand — was not.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Headline GDP plus low CPI] --> A[Macro anchors better] H --> Q[Quality of growth] Q --> J[PLFS jobs gap] Q --> N[NBFC IL-FS credit stress] Q --> R[Rural demand and capex] J --> V[Not yet good shape] N --> V R --> V
Conclusion
Low inflation and a run of decent GDP are strengths of the RBI–Budget framework. They did not, by 2019, mean the economy was in good shape. Jobs, NBFCs, private investment and farm incomes had to improve, through credit repair, public capex, and schemes such as PM-KISAN and Make in India that actually raise demand and factory output.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How far is Integrated Farming System (IFS) helpful in sustaining agricultural production.
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
If inflation is low, is the economy healthy?
Low inflation is a necessary anchor. Health also needs jobs, credit, and investment. India had the first without the rest in 2018–19.
-
Did Make in India already fix the growth mix?
No. Manufacturing’s share of GVA stayed near one-sixth. The slogan had not yet delivered the factory jobs the slowdown required.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q3 · GS III · 10 marks
How far is Integrated Farming System (IFS) helpful in sustaining agricultural production. -
2019 · Q4 · GS III · 10 marks
Elaborate the impact of National Watershed Project in increasing agricultural production from water-stressed areas. -
2019 · Q5 · GS III · 10 marks
How was India benefitted from the contributions of Sir M. Visvesvaraya and Dr. M. S. Swaminathan in the fields of water engineering and agricultural science respectively? -
2019 · Q6 · GS III · 10 marks
What is India's plan to have its own space station and how will it benefit our space programme? -
2019 · Q13 · GS III · 15 marks
What are the reformative steps taken by the Government to make food grain distribution system more effective? -
2019 · Q15 · GS III · 15 marks
How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies? -
2018 · Q4 · GS III · 10 marks
Examine the role of supermarkets in supply chain management of fruits, vegetables and food items. How do they eliminate number of intermediaries? (150 Words, 10 Marks). -
2018 · Q5 · GS III · 10 marks
Discuss the work of 'Bose-Einstein Statistics' done by Prof. Satyendra Nath Bose and show how it revolutionized the field of Physics. (150 Words, 10 Marks).
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
Enumerate the indirect taxes which have been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST) in India. Also, comment on the revenue implications of the GST introduced in India since July 2017.
Government Budgeting
GST from 1 July 2017 subsumed central excise, service tax, CVD, SAD, VAT, CST, entry tax, luxury tax and related cesses. Petroleum products, alcohol for human consumption and electricity stay outside. Compensation Act 2017 gave States a 14 per cent floor over the 2015–16 base for five years. Early collections were uneven; later compliance rails raised monthly GST. Revenue will thicken if slabs shrink and petroleum enters GST in a phased way.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
How far is Integrated Farming System (IFS) helpful in sustaining agricultural production.
Indian Economy
IFS combines crops with livestock, trees or fish so waste becomes an input. It sustains output through soil organic matter, farm ponds, and year-round income. RAD, NMSA, RKVY and ICAR models are the public frame. PM-KISAN, PMFBY and PMKSY make the mix bankable and less risky. Limits are capital, extension, and markets; IFS is not a full substitute for procurement and water reform.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2019 · GS III · 10 marks
Elaborate the impact of National Watershed Project in increasing agricultural production from water-stressed areas.
Indian Economy
Neeranchal backs IWMP, now WDC-PMKSY, as the national watershed effort. Structures slow runoff, cut soil loss, and recharge wells in rainfed blocks. The production gain is cropping intensity and a less risky kharif, plus fodder. MGNREGA and PMKSY convergence turn a trench into a second crop. Borewell over-extraction and unmaintained structures cap the impact.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.