Revision summary
Beaches and dunes are storm buffers, freshwater lenses, and nest sites. Mining, licensed or not, causes erosion, salinity, and fishery decline. Kollam–Alappad, Tamil Nadu mineral coasts, Odisha turtle beaches and Konkan dunes are cited cases. Monazite belts add a radioactive-tailings risk. CRZ, sand-mining guidelines and inland manufactured sand are the way forward.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Coastal sand is not an inert pile. It is the beach–dune–bar system that absorbs waves, stores freshwater, and hosts nests and fisheries. Legal leases for construction sand or placer minerals (ilmenite, garnet, rutile, monazite) and illegal night mining both strip that buffer. The Coastal Regulation Zone notifications and Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines (2016) try to draw a line; the shoreline still recedes where the line is ignored.
Body
Impacts
- Erosion and storm surge: removing sand starves downdrift beaches. After the 2004 tsunami, Kerala’s Chellanam and parts of Puducherry–Tamil Nadu showed how a thin beach lets waves hit homes. Mining makes that thinning faster.
- Saline intrusion: dunes and sand bars hold a freshwater lens. When they are cut, wells in coastal panchayats turn brackish, which hits drinking water and coconut/paddy.
- Biodiversity: Olive Ridley mass nesting at Gahirmatha, Rushikulya and Devi (Odisha) needs a dark, sloped beach. Lights, pits and vehicle tracks from mining destroy nests. Leatherback and olive ridley stretches of Tamil Nadu–Kerala, and turtle beaches of Goa and the Andamans, face the same logic.
- Fisheries and livelihoods: surf-zone sand flats are nursery habitat. Turbidity and channel change cut artisanal catch. Alappad and Chavara (Kollam) in Kerala became national examples of villages fighting Indian Rare Earths / private dredging and illegal removal.
- Radioactive and heavy-mineral waste: Kerala–Tamil Nadu monazite sands, if mined without tight control, leave thorium-bearing tailings and dust — a public-health layer on top of erosion.
- Legal mining is not harmless: even a licensed CRZ clearance can over-extract if replenishment studies are paper exercises. Illegal mining adds no royalty, no restoration, and often armed local cartels (reported on stretches of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra’s Konkan).
Examples
- Kerala: Kollam–Alappad mineral sand belt; protests after coastal erosion and well salinity.
- Tamil Nadu: Kanyakumari–Tuticorin garnet and silica belts; illegal river-mouth and beach removal feeding the construction boom.
- Odisha: pressure on turtle coasts if ports and sand barges disturb Gahirmatha’s intertidal profile.
- Goa and Maharashtra: dune flattening for construction sand despite CRZ.
Response
- Enforce CRZ 2011/2019, Environment Protection Act, MMDR leases, and NGT orders; map replenishment; use NDMA coastal-hazard views in clearances; give fishers a stake in watch.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Coastal sand mining] --> E[Beach erosion] M --> S[Saline wells] M --> T[Turtle and fishery loss] E --> H[Homes and surge risk] S --> L[Livelihood harm] T[T] --> L[L] H --> P[CRZ NGT NDMA enforcement]
Conclusion
Legal and illegal coastal sand mining both strip the natural seawall. Kollam, the Tamil Nadu mineral belt, Odisha’s turtle beaches and the Konkan dunes are the proof. Production of sand must shift inland to manufactured and recycled aggregate, with CRZ and replenishment rules that are policed, not only gazetted.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Define the concept of carrying capacity of an ecosystem as relevant to an environment. Explain how understanding this concept is vital while planning for sustainable development of a region.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q17). View answer →
-
Is legal coastal mining safe if royalty is paid?
Royalty does not restore a dune. Only a scientific replenishment surplus, tightly capped, can be safe — and many coasts have no surplus.
-
Can river sand bans shift pressure to beaches?
Yes. That is why manufactured sand, recycled concrete, and inland sources must be the policy substitute, not the next shoreline.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q8 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS III · 10 marks · Solution
Discuss the aim and goals of Kunming-Montreal global biodiversity framework. Mention India's commitments and initiatives to achieve the goals and targets of this framework giving suitable examples.
Environment and Conservation
• Adopted at CBD COP15, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aims to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. • It outlines a 2050 vision of living in harmony with nature, supported by four long-term goals and 23 actionable targets. • Key global targets include the "30x30" initiative (conserving 30% of land and oceans), restoring 30% of degraded ecosystems, and cutting harmful subsidies. • India aligns its national policies by updating its National Biodiversity Action Plan (NBAP) to match the framework's 23 targets. • India supports the 30x30 goal through an extensive network of over 990 protected areas covering roughly 5.3% of its landmass. • Flagship species conservation efforts like Project Tiger, Project Elephant, and cheetah introductions drive direct ecosystem restoration. • The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 empowers grassroots conservation via local Biodiversity Management Committees and People's Biodiversity Registers.
Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS III · 15 marks · Solution
Write a review on India's climate commitments under the Paris Agreement (2015) and mention how these have been further strengthened in COP26 (2021). In this direction, how has the first Nationally Determined Contribution intended by India been updated in 2022?
Environment and Conservation
The 2015 NDC promised a 33–35 per cent cut in emissions intensity by 2030, 40 per cent non-fossil power capacity, and a large forest sink. COP26’s Panchamrit raised the political bar, including 500 GW non-fossil, a billion-tonne cut and net zero by 2070. In August 2022 India updated the NDC to 45 per cent intensity reduction and 50 per cent non-fossil installed capacity by 2030. Per-capita equity remains India’s diplomatic line. Pledges now need coal-path honesty and real forest carbon.
Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS III · 15 marks · Solution
Mineral resources are fundamental to the country's economy and these are exploited by mining. Why is mining considered an environmental hazard? Explain the remedial measures required to reduce the environmental hazard due to mining.
Environment and Conservation
Mining underpins industry but strips forest, dirties air and water, and displaces people. Open-cast coal, metal tailings, sand mining and illegal pits are the main Indian hazard types. EIA, District Mineral Foundations, scientific closure and forest rights are the legal remedies. Illegal mining needs satellite watch and police, not only a new rule. Some deposits should remain unmined where ecology and consent fail.