Revision summary
The WTO sets common trade rules and dispute settlement for a globalised market. The Doha round (2001) promised development but stalled on agriculture versus industrial and services ambition. India needs a permanent solution on public food stockholding and a Special Safeguard Mechanism for farmers. India also seeks Mode 4 services access and TRIPS health flexibilities, and resists paying first in NAMA. If Doha dies, mega-regionals may set rules without India, so New Delhi still wants a fair multilateral finish, not a silent burial.
Model answer
Introduction
The World Trade Organization, set up in 1995, is meant to write common rules, cut trade barriers, settle disputes, and keep globalisation from becoming a jungle of the strongest. The Doha Development Agenda, launched in 2001, promised that this round would put developing-country needs first. By 2016 that round looked stalled: the United States and the European Union wanted more opening in industry and services; India and many G-20 farm countries wanted a genuine correction of farm subsidies and a liveable deal on food security.
Body
Aims of the WTO, and why Doha mattered
- The WTO houses agreements on goods (GATT 1994), services (GATS), and intellectual property (TRIPS), plus a binding dispute settlement system.
- Its broader aim is non-discrimination (most-favoured nation and national treatment), transparency, and progressive liberalisation with special and differential treatment for poorer members.
- Doha was sold as a development round: agriculture, non-agricultural market access (NAMA), services, TRIPS and public health, special and differential treatment, and implementation issues of the Uruguay Round.
Why the round looks doomed: North–South split
- Agriculture: developed members keep large domestic support and export competition tools. Developing members asked for a Special Safeguard Mechanism and for Special Products to protect food and livelihood security. Those asks were treated in rich capitals as a brake on 'ambition'.
- NAMA: developed members pushed a Swiss formula that would cut higher industrial tariffs faster. India and others feared de-industrialisation if peak bindings fell before their firms were ready.
- Services: India has offensive interests in Mode 4 (movement of professionals) and in some Mode 1 work. Partners offered little on visas and professional recognition, while asking India to bind more sectors at home.
- TRIPS: the Doha declaration on public health (2001) and the later paragraph-6 system for compulsory-licence exports were a developing-country win. Newer pressure on TRIPS-plus in bilateral deals sits outside the round but poisons trust.
- Process: consensus among 160-plus members, green-room exclusion, and shifting chairs made a single undertaking almost impossible. Bali (2013) saved a trade-facilitation deal only by parking the hardest farm fights.
Indian perspective
- India joined the WTO to lock most-favoured-nation access, use dispute settlement (as in several textile, steel and shrimp fights), and shape rules rather than only receive them.
- Food security is not a slogan for India. Public stockholding for the PDS and MSP operations can hit the old de minimis subsidy cap. At Bali, India sought a peace clause; Nairobi (2015) did not close a permanent solution. That unfinished file is a main reason India will not treat Doha as dead while still being asked to pay in NAMA.
- Livelihood of a large small-farmer population explains India's defence of the Special Safeguard Mechanism. A sudden import surge can destroy a season's income in a way that a rich-country farmer, backed by a cheque, does not face.
- India also wants more Mode 4 access and recognition of qualifications. A Doha package that opens goods and keeps professionals out is a bad bargain for India's endowment.
- India used TRIPS flexibilities in the Patents Act (Sections 3(d), compulsory licensing) after 2005. It will resist a Doha-or-bilateral agenda that closes those flexibilities.
- At the same time, Indian industry and services exporters need a working WTO. If Doha dies, mega-regionals (TPP-type deals, even if India is outside) will write rules without New Delhi. That is a strategic cost.
- India's line has therefore been: finish the development issues of Doha; do not replace them with a rich-country 'new issues' list (investment, procurement) until the old farm and food agenda is honoured.
Discuss, do not only blame
- Developing countries are not one bloc. Some Cairns-style farm exporters want more access into India. India must still protect the PDS farmer without pretending that every tariff is sacred.
- Developed-country politics after 2008 (jobs, China shock, later Brexit talk) reduced their room to cut farm support. Deadlock is political on both sides.
- A doomed single undertaking does not erase WTO dispute settlement or existing bindings. India should still use those, while keeping the moral claim that Doha's development promise was not a footnote.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD WTO[WTO manage and promote trade] --> Doha[Doha development round] Doha --> N[Developed NAMA services TRIPS-plus] Doha --> S[Developing farm SSM food stocks Mode 4] N --> Stall[Round stalled] S --> Stall Stall --> IN[India peace clause and SSM defence]
Conclusion
The WTO's aim is to manage and promote trade under common rules. Doha looks doomed because developed members will not give enough on farm support and food-security stockholding, while asking developing members to cut industrial tariffs and bind services. From India's perspective the round cannot be buried until a permanent solution on public stockholding, a usable special safeguard, and a fairer services Mode-4 offer are on the table — or else globalisation's rules will be written in clubs that leave Indian livelihoods out.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the impediments India is facing in its pursuit of a permanent seat in UNSC.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q18). View answer →
-
Why does public stockholding collide with WTO farm rules?
If the government buys grain at a support price and stocks it for PDS, the gap above a 1986–88 reference price can count as trade-distorting support and hit India's de minimis limit.
-
Is India against all new WTO talks if Doha is stuck?
India's stated line is that development leftovers should be settled first. It still uses dispute settlement and existing agreements, and it joins some plurilateral talks case by case.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
"The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance." Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard. -
2024 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks
'Terrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security.' Evaluate the effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council's Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC) and its associated bodies in addressing and mitigating this threat at the international level. -
2020 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
"The incidence and intensity of poverty are more important in determining poverty based on income alone". In this context analyze the latest United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index Report. -
2018 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks
What are the key areas of reform if the WTO has to survive in the present context of 'Trade War', especially keeping in mind the interest of India? (15). -
2017 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks
What are the main functions of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)? Explain different functional commissions attached to it. -
2015 · Q18 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss the impediments India is facing in its pursuit of a permanent seat in UNSC.
More from this topic
Q20 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
"The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance." Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard.
International Institutions
UNSC reform needs P5 ratification (Article 108); Intergovernmental Negotiations still lack an agreed text. G4, Uniting for Consensus and the Ezulwini African claim block one another. US vetoes and Russo-Chinese blocking on Ukraine, Gaza and other files show East–West (and North–South) entanglement. The quote is right on deadlock; it underplays African and Latin American vetoes on who joins. Practical movement: longer elected seats, veto restraint on atrocities, GA strength — not a speech about imminent permanency.
Q19 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 15 marks
'Terrorism has become a significant threat to global peace and security.' Evaluate the effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council's Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC) and its associated bodies in addressing and mitigating this threat at the international level.
International Institutions
The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee was born of Resolution 1373 to monitor the global counter-terror legal order. The Executive Directorate, the 1267 ISIL/Al-Qaida sanctions, and Resolution 1540 form the associated cluster. Gains: binding duties, listings, capacity visits, aviation and finance norms. Limits: no common definition, permanent-member naming politics, rights abuse, new financing tech, no army. The Financial Action Task Force is separate and often hurts more than a Committee letter. The machine is a floor of laws, not a cure for a divided Council.
Q16 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS II · 15 marks
"The incidence and intensity of poverty are more important in determining poverty based on income alone". In this context analyze the latest United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index Report.
International Institutions
Income poverty ignores overlapping deprivations; MPI multiplies incidence by intensity. Global MPI 2020 (UNDP/OPHI) used health, education and living-standard indicators with a one-third cut-off. About 1.3 billion people were MPI-poor globally, many of them children, concentrated in South Asia and Africa. India had large MPI reductions but a still-large rural and high-intensity residual. COVID-19 was flagged as a shock that could reverse gains even if 2019 income looked better.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.