Revision summary
The SCO is consensus-based, so India–China LAC tension and India–Pakistan terror disputes stall it. Russia–Ukraine and expansion add further strain among members. India mitigates by keeping channels, chairing practical 2023 cooperation, and putting counter-terrorism on the agenda. It will not treat Jammu and Kashmir as an SCO bilateral dispute. Full political settlement of LAC or Pakistan issues will not come from the SCO itself.
Model answer
Introduction
The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is a Eurasian security and connectivity forum whose members include India, China, Russia, Pakistan, and the Central Asian States. Bilateral conflict among members, especially on the Line of Actual Control and on India–Pakistan terror and Kashmir, has slowed consensus, which is the working method of the SCO.
Body
How conflict has affected the SCO
- The SCO runs on consensus; a clash between two members on the agenda can freeze joint statements, military exercises, or connectivity text.
- India–China relations after the 2020 Galwan clash and the continuing LAC standoff reduced trust inside a body that China helped to found.
- India–Pakistan disputes over cross-border terrorism, and India’s refusal to discuss Jammu and Kashmir as a bilateral SCO item, block the security-conversation the charter advertises.
- Russia’s war in Ukraine after 2022 split extra-regional partners and made energy and payment talk harder even when the SCO itself is not a party to that war.
- Expansion, including Iran’s membership track, adds more unresolved neighbourhoods to the same consensus table.
India’s role in mitigation
- India uses the SCO to keep a working channel with China and Russia without accepting a China-led security order, which is damage-limitation rather than full political settlement.
- As SCO Chair in 2022–23 India hosted the Council of Heads of State (the virtual 2023 summit) and pushed practical files: connectivity, start-ups, traditional medicine, and counter-narcotics, instead of a single security narrative.
- India has consistently placed United Nations-listed terrorist groups and the need for action against safe havens on the SCO agenda, which is mitigation by naming the security problem rather than by pretending harmony.
- India skipped some China-hosted SCO military events after 2020 when LAC conditions did not allow business as usual, showing that mitigation is not silence.
- India also balances the SCO with the Quad, I2U2, and bilateral Central Asian summits, so Eurasian engagement does not depend on one blocked forum.
Limits of that role
- India cannot adjudicate the LAC or Pakistan-sponsored terrorism inside an SCO statement that China or Pakistan will not sign.
- Mitigation is therefore issue-based cooperation, chair-year agenda-setting, and refusal to let the forum be used against Indian territorial integrity.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Member conflicts LAC and terror] --> S[SCO consensus freeze] I[India] --> H[2023 chair practical agenda] I --> T[Counter-terror naming] I --> B[Other minilaterals] H --> M[Mitigation not full settlement] T --> M
Conclusion
Conflict among members has slowed the SCO because the organisation needs consensus. India’s role is to keep the table open, to chair practical cooperation as it did in 2023, and to insist on counter-terrorism language, not to dissolve the LAC or India–Pakistan disputes inside the SCO.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Indian diaspora has scaled new heights in the West. Describe its economic and political benefits for India.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q10). View answer →
-
Can the SCO settle the LAC?
No. The LAC is a bilateral military and diplomatic issue. The SCO can at most keep a multilateral channel open.
-
Did India leave the SCO after Galwan?
No. It stayed, skipped some military events, and used the 2023 chair to shift the agenda toward practical cooperation and terror language.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks
Do you think that BIMSTEC is a parallel organisation like the SAARC ? What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the two ? How are Indian foreign policy objectives realized by forming this new organisation ? -
2021 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks
Critically examine the aims and objectives of SCO. what importance does it hold for India. -
2020 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks
'Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD)' is the transforming itself into a trade bloc from a military alliance, in present times - Discuss. -
2016 · Q19 · GS II · 12 marks
"Increasing cross-border terrorist attacks in India and growing interference in the internal affairs of member-states by Pakistan are not conducive for the future of SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation)." Explain with suitable examples.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment.
Indian Constitution
Democracy needs courts that can enforce the Constitution against the elected majority. Articles 50, 121, 124, 211 and 217, charged salaries, and a hard removal process are the main guarantees. The 99th Amendment and the NJAC were struck down in 2015 as a threat to independence of appointments. Independence is a prerequisite; opacity of the collegium is a separate reform problem, not a reason to remove the guarantee.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
Who are entitled to receive free legal aid? Assess the role of the National Legal Services Authority(NALSA) in rendering free legal aid in India.
Governance and Policy
Article 39A and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, create the right to free legal aid. Section 12 names SC/ST persons, women, children, persons in custody, workmen, persons with disability, disaster victims, and the income-poor. NALSA heads the statutory system of State authorities, court committees, clinics and Lok Adalats. The system is wide in design and still thin in quality of trial representation. Assessment therefore credits outreach and asks for better fees, first-hearing counsel, and published coverage data.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 10 marks
"The states in India seem reluctant to empower urban local bodies both functionally as well as financially." Comment.
Governance and Policy
The 74th Amendment and the Twelfth Schedule create municipalities but leave devolution to State law. Parastatals and State-appointed commissioners keep functions out of the elected council. Property tax is constrained; GST ended octroi and sent compensation to States, not cities. Late State Finance Commissions and approval for borrowing keep cities fiscally dependent. The statement is correct: functional and financial empowerment is still a State choice.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.