Revision summary
The Vice-President is ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha under Articles 64 and 89. The chair keeps order, applies the rules, and has only a casting vote on a tie under Article 100(1). Joint sittings are chaired by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, not by the Vice-President. Removal is by Rajya Sabha resolution of a majority of all then members, agreed to by the Lok Sabha, under Article 67(b). While acting as President under Article 65, the Vice-President does not continue as the sitting Chairman.
Model answer
Introduction
The Vice-President is, by Article 64, ex officio Chairman of the Council of States. That second office is the daily working of the Union’s upper House: order, debate, and a casting vote, not a parallel executive to the President.
Body
Constitutional offices that must be kept distinct
- Article 63 creates the office of Vice-President of India; Article 64 makes that person the ex officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and bars another office of profit.
- When the President’s office is vacant, or the President is unable to discharge functions, the Vice-President acts as President or discharges those functions under Article 65; during that period the duties of Chairman are performed by the Deputy Chairman, because one person cannot preside and act as President at once in the scheme of the text.
- Article 89(1) repeats that the Vice-President is ex officio Chairman; Article 89(2) provides for a Deputy Chairman elected by the Council.
Role on the floor of the Rajya Sabha
- As Chairman, the Vice-President presides over sittings, interprets the Rules of Procedure, admits questions and motions, and maintains order, including naming a member or adjourning a disorderly House.
- Article 100(1) applies to the Chairman as to the Speaker: there is no vote in the first instance, but a casting vote on equality of votes, which is a tie-breaker, not a party whip.
- The Chairman does not preside over a joint sitting of Parliament; Article 108 assigns that duty to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
- Money bills originate in the Lok Sabha; the Chairman’s Rajya Sabha is a revising and deliberative chamber on ordinary legislation, and a co-equal chamber on several other bills, which shapes how the chair manages time.
Removal, impartiality, and Article 67(b)
- Article 67(b) allows removal of the Vice-President by a resolution of the Rajya Sabha passed by a majority of all the then members of the Council and agreed to by the Lok Sabha, after at least fourteen days’ notice.
- Article 92 directs that the Chairman shall not preside while a resolution for his removal is under consideration; the Deputy Chairman or another person then takes the chair.
- That removal process, harder than an ordinary motion, is meant to protect the chair’s independence; it does not make the Chairman a political deputy Prime Minister.
Practical weight of the office
- A Chairman who is trusted across benches can protect Question Hour and committee time; a Chairman seen as partisan damages the Council’s claim to be a House of elders.
- The Vice-President has no independent executive veto in ordinary government; influence as Chairman is procedural and moral, which is still decisive on close divisions and on the dignity of the Opposition.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD V[Art 63 Vice-President] --> C[Art 64 89 ex officio Chairman] C --> P[Presides Rajya Sabha] C --> T[Art 100(1) casting vote] C --> R[Art 67(b) removal by RS plus LS]
Conclusion
As Chairman under Articles 64 and 89, the Vice-President runs the Rajya Sabha, votes only to break a tie under Article 100(1), and can be removed only through Article 67(b). The role is parliamentary, not a second political executive.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes in the wake of its transformation from a statutory body to a constitutional body.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Does the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha vote on every bill?
No. There is no ordinary vote. There is only a casting vote if the House is equally divided.
-
Can the Lok Sabha remove the Vice-President by itself?
No. Article 67(b) starts in the Rajya Sabha and requires the Lok Sabha only to agree to that resolution.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"Constitutionally guaranteed judicial independence is a prerequisite of democracy". Comment. -
2023 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
" The Construction of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society". Illustrate with special reference to the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. -
2023 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the constitutional perspectives of Gender Justice with the help of relevant Constitutional Provisions and case laws. -
2022 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the essential conditions for exercise of the legislative powers by ne Governor. Discuss the legality of re-promulgation of ordinances by the Governor without placing them before the Legislature. -
2022 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Critically examine the procedures through which the Presidents of India and France are elected. -
2021 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
'Constitutional Morality' is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of 'Constitutional Morality' with the help of relevant judicial decisions. -
2021 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
Analyze the distinguishing features of the notion of Equality in the Constitutions of the USA and India. -
2021 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the constitutional provisions under which Legislative Councils are established. Review the working and current status of Legislative Councils with suitable illustrations.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS II · 10 marks
"The most significant achievement of modern law in India is the constitutionalization of environmental problems by the Supreme Court." Discuss this statement with the help of relevant case laws.
Executive and Judiciary
Environmental harm in India was brought under Articles 21, 48A and 51A(g) by the Supreme Court, not only under pollution statutes. M.C. Mehta (Oleum gas) imposed absolute liability on hazardous industry and a capacity-based measure of damages. Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum (1996) adopted the precautionary principle, polluter pays, and sustainable development as Indian environmental law. PIL under Article 32 made those holdings usable against public authorities and factories. The achievement is doctrinal and remedial; boards and municipalities still decide whether the right is real on the ground.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS II · 10 marks
"Right of movement and residence throughout the territory of India are freely available to the Indian citizens, but these rights are not absolute. " Comment.
Transparency and e-Governance
Article 19(1)(d) and (e) give citizens free movement and residence throughout India. Article 19(5) permits reasonable restrictions in the public interest and for Scheduled Tribe protection. Inner Line and special State provisions show those limits in operation. Foreigners have no Article 19 mobility rights; they rely on Article 21. Foreign travel is Article 21, not 19(1)(d), after Maneka Gandhi.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2022 · GS II · 10 marks
To what extent, in your opinion, as the decentralisation of power in India changed the governance landscape at the grassroots?
Governance and Policy
The 73rd and 74th Amendments constitutionalised panchayats and municipalities, with SECs and fixed tenure. The Eleventh and Twelfth Schedules list functions but Articles 243G and 243W leave devolution to the State. State Finance Commissions exist in the text and are often late or only partly implemented. Political presence of women and SC/ST persons at the local level is the clearest change. Fiscal and administrative autonomy remains limited, so the extent of change in daily governance is partial.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.