Revision summary
Caste no longer monopolises Indian social explanation. Srinivas showed mobility through Sanskritisation and dominant castes. Béteille saw class rise without the death of caste identity. Marriage, elections, and atrocities keep jati empirically alive. Multi-cultural India needs caste plus class, gender, and region.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Caste is no longer the only key to Indian society. It has not become a museum piece. M. N. Srinivas and André Béteille still help: ritual rank changed, inequality and identity did not vanish. Multi-cultural India is language, religion, region, class, and jati.
Body
What has weakened
- Urban occupations, the Constitution, and reservations broke the old legal varna state. A software park does not display a village jajmani chart.
- Srinivas’s Sanskritisation and dominant caste already showed mobility and politics, not a frozen Manu.
- Inter-caste dining in cities, and class mixing in malls, make everyday caste less visible to the elite eye.
What remains relevant
- Marriage is still largely endogamous. Matrimonial columns and apps filter jati even when the office does not.
- Béteille argued that caste as a closed status system was yielding to class, yet caste as identity and network survived. Elections, khap disputes, and caste associations illustrate the second life.
- Atrocities, manual scavenging, and campus exclusion show hierarchy as violence, not as a forgotten custom.
- Multi-cultural claims of language and religion often sit on a caste base: a ‘Hindu’ or ‘Tamil’ public is still internally ranked.
Elaborate with the right answer
- Caste has lost monopoly as the sole explanation. It has not lost relevance. Class, gender, and region must sit beside it, as Béteille insisted, without a premature obituary.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD OLD[Ritual hierarchy] --> W[Weaker in law and city jobs] ID[Endogamy vote atrocity] --> R[Still relevant] CL[Class region religion] --> M[Multi-cultural reading] R[R] --> M[M]
Conclusion
Caste is less total in law and office than in 1950. It remains a primary tool for marriage, vote, and humiliation. Multi-cultural India is misread if caste is declared irrelevant.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you agree that regionalism in India appears to be a consequence of rising cultural assertiveness? Argue.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q10). View answer →
-
Does urbanisation kill caste?
It hides some rituals. It rarely kills marriage rules or surname networks.
-
Is class enough now?
Class matters more than village textbooks allowed. It does not replace caste as a full account.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q10 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution
Do you think digital technology promotes social empowerment? Explain with examples.
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
Digital technology acts as a double-edged sword for social empowerment, bridging gaps in marginalized communities while simultaneously creating new forms of exclusion. On one hand, e-governance, financial inclusion via Jan Dhan, and digital literacy schemes enable grassroots mobility and amplify subaltern voices. On the other hand, the digital divide, algorithmic bias, and cyber-exclusion exacerbate existing socio-economic hierarchies. Therefore, structural interventions alongside technological deployment are necessary to ensure inclusive empowerment.
Q8 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution
Unity in diversity remains the defining feature of Indian society despite the challenges from communalism and regionalism. Comment.
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
India's civilizational ethos of unity in diversity persists despite structural pressures from communalism and regionalism. The answer analyses how historical syncretism and constitutional pluralism absorb societal friction. Communal polarization threatens the secular fabric through identity politics and majoritarianism. Regional aspirations, while occasionally manifesting as divisive sub-nationalism, often reflect genuine developmental imbalances. The conclusion highlights constitutionalism and inclusive governance as the anchors for reinforcing national cohesion.
Q9 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution
Intercaste marriages between castes which have socio-economic parity have increased, to some extent, but this is less true of interreligious marriages. Discuss.
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
Intercaste marriage has increased a little where education, income and urban life already match. The Hindu Marriage Act does not bar intercaste unions. The Special Marriage Act offers a civil path. The rise is selective and still a minority practice. Caste violence has not vanished. Interreligious marriage is rarer because personal law, conversion fears and honour politics raise the cost. Class can sometimes buy a caste exception. It rarely buys a religious exception in today’s climate. Constitutional choice of partner exists. Social enforcement is still family and community.