Revision summary
Religious pluralism is several faiths sharing one public life. Social solidarity is the cooperation that Durkheim split into likeness and interdependence. Srinivas, Madan, and Vidyarthi show local mixing in village, Islam, and pilgrimage towns. The Constitution protects practice; Gandhi treated unity as political work. Ambedkar showed that caste can block solidarity even inside a plural society.
Model answer
Introduction
Religious pluralism is the public fact of several religions sharing one society. Social solidarity is the bonding that lets people cooperate. In India the two meet in villages, towns, and the Constitution.
Body
Pluralism as a social fact
- Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain, Buddhist, and tribal faiths share territory, markets, and often kinship neighbourhoods.
- M. N. Srinivas showed that village festivals can include several jatis; Imtiaz Ahmad and T. N. Madan showed that Indian Islam and everyday Hindu–Muslim living are also local, not only textual.
- Ashis Nandy and Gandhi treated lived pluralism as neighbourly practice, not only as a census of communities.
- The Constitution’s Articles 25–28 protect profession and practice, which is the legal form of pluralism.
Solidarity
- Emile Durkheim distinguished mechanical solidarity of likeness from organic solidarity of interdependence. Indian towns mix both: caste and faith blocs, plus market and office interdependence.
- Shared work, jajmani remnants, and urban trade can bind unlike faiths. L. P. Vidyarthi’s sacred complex shows pilgrimage towns hosting many sects in one geography.
- M. K. Gandhi used Hindu–Muslim unity as a political form of solidarity. B. R. Ambedkar warned that caste inside Hinduism can block solidarity even when many religions exist.
When pluralism does not produce solidarity
- Riot, conversion panic, and unequal citizenship turn plurality into ranked blocs.
- Solidarity then needs law, shared livelihood, and local peace institutions, not only festival photographs.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Many religions] --> L[Law Articles 25 to 28] P --> V[Village town pilgrimage] V --> S[Solidarity] R[Riot and ranked blocs] --> X[Broken solidarity]
Conclusion
India is religiously plural by history and by law. Solidarity grows where work, neighbourhood, and equal citizenship hold. It fails when faith is used as a bloc against neighbours.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Does pluralism automatically create solidarity?
No. Sharing a map is not the same as equal cooperation. Riots and ranked citizenship show the gap.
-
Is tribal religion part of this plurality?
Yes. Sacred groves, clan cults, and later Hindu, Christian, or Islamic overlays are part of Indian religious plurality.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Define minority. Elaborate the patterns of linguistic and religious minorities in India -
2023 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
How are Other Backward Classes identified. Enumerating the important features elucidate the recent changes in their social and economic life. -
2022 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the social and religious consequences of contact between tribal and non-tribal populations -
2021 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Delineate the constitutional safeguard for religious minorities in India -
2015 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the problems faced by religious minorities in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jajmani system : continuity and change
Caste system in India
Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.