Revision summary
British revenue law replaced lineage land with paper title and landlords. Forest Acts reserved timber and criminalised shifting cultivation and nistar. Mines and tea took labour after the resource base shrank. Santhal hul and Birsa’s ulgulan were resource revolts. Fifth Schedule, PESA, and FRA answer that colonial resource history.
Model answer
Introduction
British policy turned tribal land, forest, and shifting plots into revenue, reserved woods, and mines. The major resources were not left as commons under custom.
Body
Land and plough
- Permanent settlement and ryotwari brought landlords and moneylenders into Adivasi tracts. Title on paper replaced lineage title.
- The Santhal hul of 1855 and Birsa Munda’s ulgulan answered diku landlords and mission-revenue pressure on Khuntkatti land.
Forest
- Indian Forest Acts of 1865, 1878, and 1927 reserved timber for sleepers and ships. Shifting cultivation and hunt became offence.
- Verrier Elwin described Baiga bewar as criminalised livelihood. Grazing and nistar shrank.
Mine, labour, and excise
- Coal, teak, and later minerals opened Chota Nagpur and central India. Tribal labour went to mines and tea without the old resource base.
- Excise on liquor attacked ritual brew and created contractor liquor, another resource loss.
After-image
- Independent India’s Fifth Schedule, PESA, and FRA, 2006 are replies to this resource history, not inventions from nowhere.
- Chipko later showed that forest as livelihood versus forest as outside timber remained the same fight in a new state.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD B[British policy] --> L[Land revenue diku] B --> F[Forest reservation] B --> M[Mines labour] L --> R[Santhal Birsa]
Conclusion
British land, forest, and mine law stripped tribal major resources of custom and made them revenue. Rebellions and later protective statutes are the long echo of that strip.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How can a balance be struck between livelihood concern and environmental degradation in the context of shifting cultivation?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q8(c)). View answer →
-
Did the British only take forests?
No. Land title, mines, labour, and excise all hit major resources.
-
Was shifting cultivation banned everywhere?
It was restricted and stigmatised. Local practice survived as offence more than as right.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir -
2022 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varna and Buddhism -
2022 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dharma versus Religion -
2022 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Westernisation and Modernisation. -
2022 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the methods adopted by Sir Herbert Hope Risley in classifying Indian populations. What are the criticisms against Risley's classification? -
2022 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe briefly the proto-history of Gujarat. Discuss the significance of Gujarat's proto-history in international trade -
2022 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine Indigenisation of Christianity in India -
2022 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Regionalism as an opportunity and threat to national integration
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Trace the history and describe the methods of formulating the lists of OBCs, both at the State and National levels
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"The village was not merely a place where people lived; it had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian civilization." Who said this? Elaborate
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The statement is from the Srinivas village-studies tradition: the village as a designed microcosm of Indian civilisation. Design includes caste ecology, agrarian rank, ritual calendar and factional politics. Values: hierarchy-with-interdependence, local dharma, jati marriage, sacred geography. Marriott, Dube and Bailey showed regional versions of the same idea. Land reform, migration, 73rd Amendment and PESA have rewritten the plan without erasing rank.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
S. R. Rao identified a burnt-brick tidal basin at Lothal as a dock beside warehouses and bead workshops. Gujarat Harappan coastal sites together support craft export to the Gulf and Mesopotamia (Meluhha). Some archaeologists prefer a reservoir reading; geomorphology of the estuary is still discussed. Even without the word dock, Lothal is a water-edge trade and craft town. International trade here is Bronze Age Gulf networks, not a modern port trust.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.