Revision summary
The Negrito problem asked if Andamanese and some southern foragers were a first Indian race. Risley and Guha framed it with hair and stature. Looks do not prove African Pygmy kinship or an all-India stratum. Andaman history is isolation and colonial shock. Drop the race problem; keep forager ethnography.
Model answer
Introduction
- The Negrito problem was a racial puzzle: whether short, dark, curly-haired groups in India, especially Andamanese and some southern hill people, were a leftover first race. The problem was badly posed.
Body
How it was framed
- Risley, Guha, and earlier travellers used hair and stature to invent a Negrito stratum under Dravidian and Aryan types.
- Andaman Islanders were the type case. Kadar and other southern foragers were sometimes pulled in.
Critique
- Hair and height are not a people. Siwalik apes and later genetics show deep mix, not stacked races.
- Andamanese history is island isolation plus colonial violence, not a museum of all-India origins.
- Linking them to African Pygmies by look is nineteenth-century analogy, not phylogeny.
- Ghurye and later anthropologists already doubted that caste and tribe are frozen races.
What remains
- The useful residue is a research question on Andaman and southern forager diversity, not a ‘problem’ of a missing race.
- Ethno-archaeology of hunt is a better frame than Negrito stock.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD R[Risley Guha types] --> N[Negrito problem] N --> X[Look-alike not phylogeny] A[Andaman foragers] --> D[Diversity not stock]
Conclusion
The Negrito problem was a colonial racial leftover. Assess it as a failed classification. Keep the Andaman and forager file without the race ladder.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Did a Negrito race people all of India?
There is no good evidence for a subcontinental Negrito stratum.
-
Should the term be used in answers?
Use it to criticise the old problem, not as a living classification.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley -
2016 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Give a detailed appraisal of skeletal remains from Chalcolithic culture of undivided Punjab -
2016 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Impact of industrialization on scheduled tribe population of Jharkhand -
2016 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Tribe as a colonial construct -
2015 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of tribal Panchsheel today -
2015 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Sacred complex as a dimension of Indian civilization -
2015 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
South Indian Paleoliths -
2015 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the paleoanthropological fossil finds from Siwalik hills. Examine the contribution of Siwalik fossils to paleoanthropological knowledge
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Linguistic elements in Indian population
Demographic profile of India
Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.