Revision summary
ITDPs, sub-plans, and schools created a small tribal salariat. The same development stack displaced many through mines and dams. Panchsheel set the ethic; delivery favoured targets. FRA and PESA try a rights-based transformation. Culture changes via school and Sanskritisation faster than mass income.
Model answer
Introduction
Tribal plans from Community Development to ITDPs, TSP, and FRA-linked schemes try to transform tribes into schooled, healthy, and market-ready citizens. The social result is a split generation more than a uniform new society.
Body
Programme stack
- Nehruvian Panchsheel promised genius-respecting development. Five-Year Plan tribal sub-plans and ITDPs delivered hostels, wells, and some cooperatives.
- PESA, reservations, and panchayati raj added political office.
- FRA 2006 tried to make transformation rest on recognised forest, not only on the hostel.
Impact on transformation
- A small ST middle class of teachers, jawans, and clerks is the clear success.
- Roads and mines under the same plans transformed many into displaced labour, the Jharkhand pattern.
- Vidyarthi would call forest loss a transformation of the whole cosmos, not a welfare upgrade.
- Srinivas-like Sanskritisation and church education ride the school, so custom changes faster than income.
Balance
- Plans did transform. They stratified. They rarely met Panchsheel’s human-quality test for the majority.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PL[ITDP TSP school] --> MC[ST middle class] PL --> D[Displacement mines] FRA[FRA PESA] --> L[Rights-based path]
Conclusion
Programmes transformed tribes by creating an educated layer and by opening land to the market. Social transformation is therefore class split plus cultural speed-up, not simple uplift.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the nature of social change in tribal India under the impact of developmental programmes
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
Did plans fail completely?
Literacy and a salariat grew. Land security for the majority did not match.
-
Is transformation only economic?
No. Kin, language, and ritual shift with the hostel and the road.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of NGOs in the socioeconomic and political development of weaker sections and the manner in which they facilitate other stakeholders -
2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process? -
2024 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Custodians of natural resources are the tribals, but they are the most deprived. Critically examine how climate change will impact their survival in future. -
2024 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Distinguish a 'Theocratic State' from a secular, liberal, democratic state. Illustrate your answer with examples from tribal and contemporary societies. -
2023 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the impact of modern democratic institutions on contemporary tribal societies. Illustrate with suitable ethnographic examples. -
2021 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Urbanization and tribal institutions -
2021 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of successive Land Acquisition Acts on tribal social organization -
2015 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the nature of social change in tribal India under the impact of developmental programmes
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the concept of Nation-State and describe its impact on indigenous societies
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
Nation-state: one people, territory, law and citizenship; indigenous life is clan, grove and seasonal land. India is a Union with asymmetric clauses, not a pure nation-state, but still centralising in school, army and mine. Impacts: borders, legal monopoly, standard language, development-security, market. FRA, PESA, 371 and Sixth Schedule are domestic tools of coexistence. India has not ratified ILO 169; consultation remains the unkept promise.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process?
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
Limits: consent deficit, list-area mismatch, livelihood substitution, last-mile services, security overlay, elite capture, blunt data. Xaxa, PESA, FRA and Niyamgiri name the same gap between paper and hamlet. Anthropology contributes field method, ethnoecology, medical and linguistic knowledge, gendered land. Use it in FRA mapping and social impact before clearance, not as decoration in an EIA. PM-JANMAN helps only if PVTG hamlets author the micro-plan.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of NGOs in the socioeconomic and political development of weaker sections and the manner in which they facilitate other stakeholders
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
NGOs run last-mile services and translate FRA, PESA, scholarships and health camps for ST, SC and minorities. Politically they support Gram Sabha, RTI and PIL; Niyamgiri-type cases show them beside, not above, the village. They broker schemes, banks and CSR. Risks: donor capture, FCRA chill, elite contractors, substitution of the state. Xaxa’s measure is whether the hamlet still decides.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.