Revision summary
Missions schooled a Central Indian ST layer and changed rite and marriage. Elwin and Ghurye criticised cultural loss and national split. NGOs now file FRA and health; some become new brokers. Transformation is uneven beside mining displacement. Panchsheel remains the test of whether genius and land survive.
Model answer
Introduction
NGOs and missionaries have been schoolmasters, healers, and political brokers in Central Indian tribal belts. Transformation through them is literacy and a new split of faith and faction.
Body
Missionaries
- Mission schools in Chotanagpur and neighbouring Gond–Bhil country produced clerks and a Christian ST middle class.
- Elwin feared cultural loss; Ghurye feared a nation split. Both named a real transformation of marriage, drink, and festival.
- Missions also documented language and opposed some bonded labour, a reform role.
NGOs
- Post-1980 NGOs run FRA files, health, and sometimes anti-mine legal aid in Fifth Schedule Jharkhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh.
- They can strengthen the gram sabha or replace it as a new patron, the interference charge of 2015 still alive.
Critical balance
- Transformation is partial: a schooled layer, converted hamlets, and a majority still on the mine’s edge.
- Vidyarthi’s cosmos may be translated into church or NGO project, not always destroyed.
- The fair test remains Panchsheel: own genius and land, not the donor’s log-frame.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Missions] --> S[School new faith] N[NGOs] --> F[FRA health] T[Transformation] --> X[Split layer vs land loss]
Conclusion
Missionaries and NGOs transformed Central Indian STs through school, creed, and paralegal help. They also created new dependence. Land law, not the mission compound, must remain the core of change.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically compare 'Affirmative Action' of USA and 'Protective Discrimination' for Scheduled Tribes in India
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q4(c)). View answer →
-
Did missionaries only convert?
They also ran literacy and some labour protest. Conversion was still a social split.
-
Should NGOs leave tribal areas?
Where they replace the gram sabha, yes. Where they only file FRA, they fill a state gap.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes. -
2023 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye. -
2021 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes -
2016 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the difficulties experienced by scheduled tribes with regard to implementation of the 'Recognition of Forest Rights Act, 2006' -
2016 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the exploitation of scheduled castes in India -
2016 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write in detail various provisions provided by the Constitution of India for the scheduled tribes under Fifth and Sixth Schedules -
2015 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically compare 'Affirmative Action' of USA and 'Protective Discrimination' for Scheduled Tribes in India
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes.
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
Backward Classes (OBCs) are covered by Articles 15(4) and 16(4), the 340 commissions, and constitutional NCBC (338B). The 105th Amendment restored state OBC lists after the 102nd Amendment controversy. 15(5) supports education reservation; 16(6) EWS is a separate economic quota. Indra Sawhney set 27 percent, creamy layer and a general 50 percent ceiling. OBC safeguards differ from SC/ST list protections and from Fifth/Sixth Schedule land autonomy.
Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye.
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
Ghurye held that Indian tribes are incomplete Hindus who should be absorbed into caste civilisation. He was right that many middle-Indian groups already share festivals, rank, and landlords with peasants. Bose, Srinivas, Roy, and Bailey document that continuum. He was wrong to treat Khasi matriliny, Naga polity, Munda khuntkatti, and sarna or church as mere backwardness. Elwin, Haimendorf, and the Xaxa Committee keep tribe as a distinct historical and legal category.
Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
ST attainment lags because of distance, migration, and teacher gaps. Unscheduled home languages meet a majority-medium school. Ashram and Eklavya schools raise enrolment more than outcomes. Reservation helps the few who finish the ladder. Health and land poverty keep education a risky bet.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.