Revision summary
Both policies use group preference after historic exclusion. Indian ST protection is constitutional and includes land and schedules. US affirmative action is mainly education and employment, plus a separate Native-law track. Ghurye–Elwin debates still haunt who counts as tribe. Both risk elite capture; India’s extra tools are territorial.
Model answer
Introduction
Affirmative action in the USA and protective discrimination for Scheduled Tribes in India both use group preference to repair historic exclusion. They differ in constitution, land, and the meaning of tribe.
Body
Shared logic
- Both admit that equal formal law is not enough after conquest, slavery, or caste-colonial ranking.
- Both use quotas or preferences in education and public jobs. Both face backlash as reverse discrimination.
Indian protective discrimination
- Articles 15(4), 16(4), 46, 330, 332, 335 and the ST list are a constitutional command, not only executive policy.
- For tribes, protection is also territorial: Fifth and Sixth Schedules, land-transfer bars, PESA, and FRA.
- G. S. Ghurye and Elwin already fought over whether the ST is a caste-like Hindu or a distinct people. Indian law treats ST as a scheduled people with land.
US affirmative action
- It grew from civil-rights litigation and university policy, weaker as a land-and-treaty system except for recognised Native nations.
- Race categories are not the same as ST lists. US Indian law is a separate sovereignty file that the phrase affirmative action often forgets.
Critique
- Indian ST protection is broader in land and councils. US race preference is more court-contested in campuses.
- Both can cream off elites and miss the forest hamlet or inner city.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD AA[US affirmative action] --> J[Jobs campuses] PD[Indian ST protection] --> J PD --> L[Fifth Sixth FRA land]
Conclusion
The two are cousins in job and college preference. India’s ST shield is thicker because it adds Scheduled Area land and councils that US affirmative action, as commonly taught, does not.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is reservation the same as affirmative action?
They are comparable in jobs and seats. Indian ST law also schedules land and councils.
-
Do Native Americans have Fifth Schedule analogues?
Treaties and reservations are a different legal history, not a copy of Article 244.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes. -
2023 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye. -
2021 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes -
2016 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the difficulties experienced by scheduled tribes with regard to implementation of the 'Recognition of Forest Rights Act, 2006' -
2016 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the exploitation of scheduled castes in India -
2016 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write in detail various provisions provided by the Constitution of India for the scheduled tribes under Fifth and Sixth Schedules -
2016 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the role of NGOs and missionaries in transformation of scheduled tribes in Central India
More from this topic
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes.
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
Backward Classes (OBCs) are covered by Articles 15(4) and 16(4), the 340 commissions, and constitutional NCBC (338B). The 105th Amendment restored state OBC lists after the 102nd Amendment controversy. 15(5) supports education reservation; 16(6) EWS is a separate economic quota. Indra Sawhney set 27 percent, creamy layer and a general 50 percent ceiling. OBC safeguards differ from SC/ST list protections and from Fifth/Sixth Schedule land autonomy.
Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye.
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
Ghurye held that Indian tribes are incomplete Hindus who should be absorbed into caste civilisation. He was right that many middle-Indian groups already share festivals, rank, and landlords with peasants. Bose, Srinivas, Roy, and Bailey document that continuum. He was wrong to treat Khasi matriliny, Naga polity, Munda khuntkatti, and sarna or church as mere backwardness. Elwin, Haimendorf, and the Xaxa Committee keep tribe as a distinct historical and legal category.
Q4(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes
Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…
ST attainment lags because of distance, migration, and teacher gaps. Unscheduled home languages meet a majority-medium school. Ashram and Eklavya schools raise enrolment more than outcomes. Reservation helps the few who finish the ladder. Health and land poverty keep education a risky bet.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.