Q5(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5(a) Q5(c) →

Islam and Matriliny

Topic: Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization. Syllabus: 1.1 Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization—Prehistoric (Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and Neolithic-Chalcolithic), Protohistoric (Indus Civilization). Pre-Harappan, Harappan and post-Harappan cultures. Contributions of the tribal cultures to Indian civilization. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization.

Revision summary

Islamic law is agnatic; some Indian Muslim communities remained matrilineal. Kerala Mappila houses and Lakshadweep are the teaching cases. Karve’s southern kinship zone helps locate the taravad. Shariat reform and courts push papers toward men. Conversion did not instantly delete mother’s-brother authority.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Islam in law prefers patrilineal descent and male-centred inheritance. In India it has also lived inside older matrilineal houses, especially among some Kerala Muslims and Lakshadweep communities.

Body

The tension

  • Sharia texts name agnatic heirs. Matriliny names the taravad or house through women.
  • Mappila and related Kerala groups historically kept matrilineal households even after Islam, a compromise Irawati Karve’s kinship zones help place in the south.
  • Reform, courts, and the Shariat Act pushed many houses toward patrilineal papers without instantly killing mother’s-brother authority on the ground.

Elsewhere

  • Lakshadweep Muslim matriliny is a clear island case of faith plus female house.
  • In most of North India, Islam met already patrilineal jati worlds, so the tension is small.
  • The anthropological point is that Islam does not automatically erase matriliny; class, court, and reform do the slow work.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  I[Islamic agnatic law] --> T[Tension]
  M[Kerala Lakshadweep taravad] --> T
  R[Reform courts] --> P[Patrilineal papers]

Conclusion

Islam and matriliny coexisted in parts of the south-west. Law and reform strain the house; custom did not vanish on conversion day.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Socioeconomic characteristics of shifting cultivators

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q5(c)). View answer →

  • Did Islam forbid matriliny in India?

    Texts favour agnates. Lived Islam in Kerala and Lakshadweep long kept female houses.

  • Is this the same as Khasi matriliny?

    No. Khasi matriliny is a different, largely non-Muslim, North-Eastern system.

More from this topic

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Contribution of L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer in Anthropology.

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer is a pioneering figure in Indian anthropology, known for his monumental ethnographic surveys like The Cochin Tribes and Castes and The Mysore Tribes and Castes. Working during the colonial era, he bridged western anthropological methods with indigenous scholarship. His documentation of social stratification, material culture, and folklore laid the empirical foundation for Indian sociology and anthropology. Iyer also established the first department of anthropology in India at the University of Calcutta, shaping institutional teaching and research.

Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Article 371A of the Indian Constitution.

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Article 371A of the Indian Constitution grants special autonomous status to Nagaland, protecting its traditional socio-religious practices, customary laws, and land ownership rights. Enacted via the 13th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1962, following the 16-point Agreement, it reflects the asymmetrical federal framework of India. The article places a special responsibility on the Governor regarding law and order and regional financial allocations. It balances tribal autonomy with national integration, though it faces implementation challenges in modern governance.

PDF