Q4(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q4 Q5 →

Critically compare 'Affirmative Action' of USA and 'Protective Discrimination' for Scheduled Tribes in India

Topic: Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and…. Syllabus: 7.1 Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Castes. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Problems of exploitation and deprivation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Tribes and….

Revision summary

Both policies use group preference after historic exclusion. Indian ST protection is constitutional and includes land and schedules. US affirmative action is mainly education and employment, plus a separate Native-law track. Ghurye–Elwin debates still haunt who counts as tribe. Both risk elite capture; India’s extra tools are territorial.

Model answer

Introduction

Affirmative action in the USA and protective discrimination for Scheduled Tribes in India both use group preference to repair historic exclusion. They differ in constitution, land, and the meaning of tribe.

Body

Shared logic

  • Both admit that equal formal law is not enough after conquest, slavery, or caste-colonial ranking.
  • Both use quotas or preferences in education and public jobs. Both face backlash as reverse discrimination.

Indian protective discrimination

  • Articles 15(4), 16(4), 46, 330, 332, 335 and the ST list are a constitutional command, not only executive policy.
  • For tribes, protection is also territorial: Fifth and Sixth Schedules, land-transfer bars, PESA, and FRA.
  • G. S. Ghurye and Elwin already fought over whether the ST is a caste-like Hindu or a distinct people. Indian law treats ST as a scheduled people with land.

US affirmative action

  • It grew from civil-rights litigation and university policy, weaker as a land-and-treaty system except for recognised Native nations.
  • Race categories are not the same as ST lists. US Indian law is a separate sovereignty file that the phrase affirmative action often forgets.

Critique

  • Indian ST protection is broader in land and councils. US race preference is more court-contested in campuses.
  • Both can cream off elites and miss the forest hamlet or inner city.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  AA[US affirmative action] --> J[Jobs campuses]
  PD[Indian ST protection] --> J
  PD --> L[Fifth Sixth FRA land]

Conclusion

The two are cousins in job and college preference. India’s ST shield is thicker because it adds Scheduled Area land and councils that US affirmative action, as commonly taught, does not.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Prehistoric Rock Art of Central India

    Next question in the 2015 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Is reservation the same as affirmative action?

    They are comparable in jobs and seats. Indian ST law also schedules land and councils.

  • Do Native Americans have Fifth Schedule analogues?

    Treaties and reservations are a different legal history, not a copy of Article 244.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    "Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye.

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Explain the difficulties experienced by scheduled tribes with regard to implementation of the 'Recognition of Forest Rights Act, 2006'

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Examine the factors responsible for the exploitation of scheduled castes in India

    View answer →

  6. 2016 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Write in detail various provisions provided by the Constitution of India for the scheduled tribes under Fifth and Sixth Schedules

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Critically examine the role of NGOs and missionaries in transformation of scheduled tribes in Central India

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Relevance of tribal Panchsheel today

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Panchsheel is Nehru’s five-point tribal ethic, shaped with Elwin. It protects genius, land-forest rights, local cadres, and human results. Ghurye’s assimilation was the rival line. PESA and FRA try to statute the same ethic. Mining and dams still test it in Fifth Schedule belts.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Sacred complex as a dimension of Indian civilization

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Vidyarthi’s sacred complex is geography, specialists, and performances at a tirtha. Gaya is the type study of sraddha and pilgrimage. It operationalises little and great tradition at a Hindu centre. Bose’s civilisational unity is visible in shared shrine maps. The model is a dimension of Indian civilisation, not only temple architecture.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2015 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

South Indian Paleoliths

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

South Indian palaeoliths centre on the Madras Acheulian of quartzite handaxes. Foote found Pallavaram in 1863 and mapped Tamil laterite industries. Attirampakkam gives a deep dated Acheulian sequence. Sankalia set the peninsula beside Narmada and Deccan sequences. The stack is local and long, not a Siwalik Soanian copy.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.