Q5(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

Fission track dating method and its applications.

Topic: Principles of Prehistoric Archaeology. Chronology. Syllabus: (a) Principles of Prehistoric Archaeology. Chronology: Relative and Absolute Dating methods. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2025 and Principles of Prehistoric Archaeology. Chronology.

Revision summary

Fission-track dating counts damage trails from uranium-238 fission in minerals or glass. Price, Walker and Fleischer developed the method. Zircon, apatite and volcanic glass are the usual materials. Applications include dating tephra at hominin sites, heated stone, and Himalayan or Siwalik thermal history. Heat can anneal tracks and reset the clock, so dates need stratigraphic and other radiometric checks. Different minerals do not share one single year-range.

Model answer

Introduction

Fission-track dating is a radiometric clock that counts damage trails left when uranium-238 atoms split inside a mineral or glass. P. B. Price, R. M. Walker and R. L. Fleischer developed the method. For anthropology it is a way to date volcanic layers and heated materials that sit with fossils or tools.

Body

How the clock works

Uranium-238 occasionally undergoes spontaneous fission. Each fission leaves a tiny track in the crystal. The sample is polished and etched so the tracks can be counted under a microscope. The uranium content is measured, often by inducing extra tracks in a reactor. Age is then a function of track density and uranium concentration.

Useful materials include zircon, apatite and volcanic glass (obsidian or tephra). The method works over a wide geological span, from relatively young volcanic glasses to much older crustal minerals. The range depends on the mineral and on whether tracks have been reset by heat.

Heat can reset as well as date. Heating can anneal old tracks and restart the clock, which is why the method also records thermal history, not only “the age of the rock”.

Applications

  • Hominin and Palaeolithic sites: Volcanic ash and tuff above or below fossils can be dated, alongside potassium–argon and argon–argon where those apply. East African rift volcanics are a standard setting.
  • Obsidian and burnt flint: Provenance and last-heating events can be approached where tracks and chemistry allow.
  • Siwaliks and mountain belts: Fission-track work on apatite and zircon is widely used in Himalayan cooling and uplift histories. That geological clock matters when we place Siwalik apes such as Sivapithecus in a landscape that was itself rising.
  • Thermochronology: Even when the “age” is not an occupation date, the thermal path of a basin or a tool-stone source is anthropological context.

Limitation

Tracks fade if the mineral is heated above a closure temperature. Mixed ages and partial annealing need specialist interpretation. Fission-track dates should be cross-checked with stratigraphy and, where possible, with another radiometric method.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  U[Uranium-238 fission] --> T[Tracks in mineral]
  T --> A[Age from density plus U content]
  A --> V[Volcanic layers with fossils]
  A --> H[Himalayan cooling / Siwaliks]

Conclusion

Fission tracks count uranium fission damage in zircon, apatite or volcanic glass. Anthropology uses them for volcanic layers, heated stone and landscape history. Heat can reset the clock, so the date is never a slogan.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution.

    Next question in the 2025 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Is this the same as carbon-14?

    No. Radiocarbon dates organic carbon on a shorter recent timescale. Fission tracks date uranium-bearing minerals and glasses, often much older volcanic or geological events.

  • How does this relate to Siwalik apes?

    Landscape clocks and volcanic clocks place fossils in time. Himalayan fission-track cooling is geological context for Sivapithecus.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Chronometric dating

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Prehistoric significance of Rakhigarhi

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Thermoluminescence (TL) dating.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Mendelian and non-Mendelian traits.

Mendelian genetics in man-family study, single factor, multifactor, lethal, sub-lethal and polygenic inheritance in man.

Mendelian traits follow one-locus segregation and can be read in a pedigree. ABO, PTC tasting, albinism, haemophilia A and Huntington disease are standard examples. Multiple alleles and sex-linkage extend Mendelism; they do not cancel it. Non-Mendelian traits include polygenic stature and skin colour, linkage, maternal mtDNA and imprinting. Environment plus many genes gives a curve, not a 3:1 ratio. Use family study for Mendelian markers and quantitative genetics for everyday variation. Single-factor, multifactor, lethal and polygenic inheritance is this same distinction.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Theoretical significance of Purum kinship-system.

Kinship

The Purum are a Kuki-Chin group used by Needham as a test case for alliance theory. The claim was prescriptive marriage to mother’s brother’s daughter, with wife-givers and wife-takers in a cycle. Needham argued against Homans and Schneider: the pattern is structure, not sentiment. The case mattered because it took elementary structures beyond Australia and clarified prescription versus preference. Ackerman and others showed that the tables did not seal the cycle as neatly as the model. The lasting names are Lévi-Strauss, Needham and the model–practice gap.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Osteodontokeratik culture and its makers.

Paleolithic

Osteodontokeratic means a supposed bone–tooth–horn culture named by Raymond Dart at Makapansgat. The claimed makers were Australopithecus prometheus, now placed in Australopithecus africanus. Dart read clubs, saws and daggers from antelope parts, and inferred hunting and violence. C. K. Brain showed that leopards, hyenas and cave processes explain much of the assemblage. The idea survives as a taphonomy lesson, not as a real industry. Osteodontokeratic is defined by site, claimed maker, and the later critique.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.