Q3(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q3 Q3 →

Explain the genetic mechanisms of micro and macro evolution

Topic: Synthetic theory of evolution. Syllabus: (c) Synthetic theory of evolution; Brief outline of terms and concepts of evolutionary biology (Doll’s rule, Cope’s rule, Gause’s rule, parallelism, convergence, adaptive radiation, and mosaic evolution). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Synthetic theory of evolution.

Revision summary

Microevolution is allele-frequency change in a population. The forces are mutation, selection, drift, gene flow, and non-random mating. Macroevolution is speciation and higher-level pattern in deep time. Punctuated equilibrium and regulatory genes are debated extras, not magic. Hominin splits and isolate drift show both scales in anthropology.

Model answer

Introduction

Microevolution is change in allele frequencies within a breeding population. Macroevolution is the origin of higher taxa, species, and long-term trends. The same genetic mechanisms scale up, with debate about extra rules.

Body

Microevolutionary mechanisms

  • Mutation supplies new alleles. Most are neutral or harmful; a few are useful, as in lactase persistence.
  • Natural selection changes frequencies by differential survival and fertility. Sickle-cell and malaria is the human classroom case.
  • Genetic drift, including founder effect and bottleneck, is strong in small groups. Andaman and other island isolates illustrate drift and founder sampling.
  • Gene flow mixes populations. Migration prevents full local fixation.
  • Non-random mating, including inbreeding and assortative mating, changes genotype frequencies and can raise homozygosity.

To the macro scale

  • Speciation is the hinge. Allopatric isolation, then reproductive barriers, turns micro change into new species. Hominin fossils show this as splitting lineages, not one file.
  • Macroevolution adds origin of bauplans, mass extinction, and adaptive radiation. Gould and Eldredge argued punctuated equilibrium: long stasis, then geologically rapid change, still built from genetic processes.
  • Chromosomal rearrangements and regulatory (Hox) shifts can produce larger morphological jumps than a single point mutation. They remain genetic mechanisms.

Unity and caution

  • The Modern Synthesis treated macro as accumulated micro. Palaeontology adds time, extinction, and development. Anthropology uses both for fossils and living variation.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  MIC[Microevolution] --> M[Mutation selection drift flow mating]
  MIC --> SP[Speciation]
  SP --> MAC[Macroevolution taxa trends]
  MAC --> F[Fossil hominin splits]

Conclusion

Mutation, selection, drift, flow, and mating rules drive microevolution. Speciation, radiation, and developmental-genetic change carry those mechanisms into macroevolution.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Discuss the salient features of different traditions of European Mesolithic

    Next question in the 2021 paper (Q3). View answer →

  • Is macroevolution a different kind of genetics?

    Mostly the same forces over longer time, plus speciation and developmental architecture.

  • Does drift create new species by itself?

    Drift changes frequencies. Isolation and reproductive barriers are needed for speciation.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the role of evolutionary forces in creating human diversity

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Animism and Deep Ecology

Religion

Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory

Family

Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Historical Particularism and Franz Boas

Historical particularism (Boas)

Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.