Q1(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(c)

Functionalism.

Topic: Functionalism (Malinowski). Syllabus: (c) Functionalism (Malinowski); Structural-Functionalism (Radcliffe-Brown) Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Functionalism (Malinowski).

Revision summary

Functionalism asks what a custom does in the present. Malinowski tied culture to individual needs. Radcliffe-Brown tied institutions to structural continuity. It justified intensive fieldwork against unilinear history. Limits are harmony bias and a thin sense of time.

Model answer

Introduction

Functionalism explains a custom by the present job it does for persons or for the social whole. It was the British school’s answer to speculative history.

Body

Two wings

  • Malinowski’s biological functionalism: culture meets seven needs, from metabolism to growth, as in Trobriand gardens and kula.
  • Radcliffe-Brown’s structural functionalism: institutions maintain social structure, as Andaman rites keep solidarity.

Yield and limit

  • Fieldwork replaced armchair stages. Every rite was asked: what does it do now?
  • Evans-Pritchard later said the Nuer need history, not only function.
  • Conflict, inequality, and change look like noise if function is only harmony. Gluckman put conflict inside function.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  F[Functionalism] --> MAL[Malinowski needs]
  F --> RB[Radcliffe-Brown structure]
  F --> LIM[History conflict]

Conclusion

Functionalism made ethnography a study of living uses. Malinowski served needs; Radcliffe-Brown served structure. History and conflict must still be let back in.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Is functionalism the same as function in ordinary English?

    It is a theory: present use explains the custom’s existence, which critics call circular.

  • Did it ignore the past?

    It postponed conjectural history. Later work put archives and oral history back.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Critically discuss the controversies related to fieldwork of Bronislaw-Malinowski and Margaret Mead.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Radcliffe-Brown's ideas on status, role and institution

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

Critically discuss the controversies related to fieldwork of Bronislaw-Malinowski and Margaret Mead.

Functionalism (Malinowski)

Malinowski’s Trobriand fieldwork founded participant observation and the kula monograph. The 1967 diaries exposed racist and sexual private speech, prompting reflexivity, not a simple cancellation of Argonauts. Mead’s Samoa argued that adolescence is culturally shaped. Freeman’s 1983 attack overstated hoax and ignored time and sample. Shankman and others restored a more careful Mead. Both controversies teach positioned method, not the death of ethnography.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Radcliffe-Brown's ideas on status, role and institution

Functionalism (Malinowski)

Status is a recognised position in social structure. Role is the rights and duties of that position. Institution is the standardised behaviour that holds statuses together. Andaman and Australian fieldwork supplied the cases. The triad is useful if conflict and history are not treated as noise.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.