Revision summary
Early anthropology used travellers, missions, and questionnaires. Torres Strait and Boas professionalised field collecting. Malinowski’s Trobriand stay became the charter of immersion. Indian village studies localised the tradition. Reflexivity and multi-sited work are the late evolution.
Model answer
Introduction
Fieldwork became anthropology’s craft over a century. It moved from travellers’ notes to a professional stay, then to reflexive and multi-sited work.
Body
Before the year in the village
- Missionaries, administrators, and Morgan’s questionnaires gathered data at a distance.
- Rivers on the Torres Strait expedition (1898) brought genealogical method and a team survey.
- Boas on the Northwest Coast combined museum collecting with repeated visits.
The classical stay
- Malinowski in the Trobriands made participant observation, the native language, and the tent the charter.
- Radcliffe-Brown in the Andamans, Mead in Samoa, and Evans-Pritchard in Nuerland spread the model.
- Srinivas and the Indian village school brought the tradition home.
Later turns
- Team projects, Chicago urban work, and Whyte’s Street Corner Society widened the ‘tribe’ field.
- Writing Culture made the stay a written, power-laden encounter. Women and indigenous anthropologists named the old male colonial gaze.
- Marcus multi-sited fieldwork follows people, things, and NGOs across borders.
- Ethics boards and long-term restudies, as in Firth’s Tikopia returns, now mark the craft.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Expedition Rivers Boas] --> M[Malinowski immersion] M --> V[Village India Srinivas] V --> R[Reflexive multi-sited]
Conclusion
The fieldwork tradition evolved from notes and expeditions to Malinowski’s immersion, then to village India, cities, and multi-sited, reflexive research. The constant is presence among the people studied.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Did Malinowski invent living with people?
He canonised it. Others had stayed; he made the method a profession.
-
Is armchair anthropology gone?
Comparative work remains, but a PhD still usually wants a field corpus.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary challenges in fieldwork method in anthropological research. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Write the historical development of field work tradition in anthropology till recent times
More from this topic
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the contemporary challenges in fieldwork method in anthropological research.
Fieldwork tradition in anthropology
Classical fieldwork assumed a bounded site; present fields are mobile, institutional and digital. Marcus offers multi-sited ethnography, but breadth can cost immersive depth. Consent must be ongoing; genomic, visual and online data create re-identification risks. Writing Culture made textual authority and representation explicit. Positionality, researcher safety and unequal risk to local assistants require planning. Collaborative design, data minimisation, language competence and return of findings strengthen—not dilute—participant observation.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Write the historical development of field work tradition in anthropology till recent times
Fieldwork tradition in anthropology
Torres Strait and Boas ended armchair evolution as the only method. Malinowski made long residence the classic. African and Indian village studies expanded the map. Reflexivity and multi-sited work named power and movement. Digital and urban fields still owe the ethic of presence.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.