Revision summary
The quotation says two decades of international terrorism put world peace under a grave, networked threat. 9/11 and 26/11 showed that a few attackers can close a city and force a State-level reply. Havens, proxies, finance, and later franchise lone actors kept the threat alive after single raids. UNSCR 1373, FATF, and the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy make the fight a shared legal duty. India’s reply is police and NIA at home plus diplomacy abroad; a solo war does not end the accountant or the video.
Model answer
Introduction
- The statement is a 2019 reading of the post-1990s map: international terrorism stopped being a distant riot and became a networked, cross-border threat to civilian peace. After two decades of escalation — from the 1990s embassy and airline attacks through 11 September 2001 and 26 November 2008 — no State can treat the fight as optional or purely local. World peace here is not a conference slogan; it is the everyday safety of cities, aviation, and markets.
Body
Why the threat loomed large
- International terrorism in those two decades used global finance, fake identities, encrypted talk, and diaspora cover, so a cell in one city could be funded and trained in another.
- Mass-casualty spectaculars (9/11, Bali, Madrid, London, 26/11 Mumbai) showed that a few trained men could shut a financial district and force a war-like State response.
- Safe havens, State-sponsored proxies, and grey-zone deniability let groups survive after a raid; the threat did not end when one camp was bombed.
- Sectarian and ideological franchises (including later ISIS-inspired lone actors) lowered the entry cost: a knife or a vehicle could copy the brand without a training camp.
- The peace dividend of the 1990s was therefore false: open borders and open media also opened attack surfaces.
Why every nation must join the fight
- A terror rupee, a stolen passport, and a radicalising video do not stop at customs; intelligence that is not shared is wasted.
- UNSCR 1373 after 9/11 made counter-terror financing, safe-haven denial, and legal cooperation a Chapter VII duty, not a favour between friends.
- The FATF network, Mutual Legal Assistance, INTERPOL notices, and extradition are the boring half of the fight; without them, a military strike only relocates the accountant.
- The UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2006) pairs security with conditions: starve the money, protect human rights so the State does not become a recruiting sergeant, and fix State incapacity that lets a sanctuary grow.
- India’s neighbourhood file — cross-border launch pads, 26/11-type city sieges, and radical online pipelines — is why New Delhi treats the fight as both a police-NIA case and a diplomatic FATF and UN case.
Limits of a purely national reply
- Unilateral wars can smash a camp and still leave the ideology and the hawala chain.
- Over-broad domestic laws without due process feed the grievance the recruiter needs.
- The “unto the last” line in the quotation is therefore a call for persistence and coalition, not for a blank cheque to any one army.
International terrorism is a global public bad; the statement is right that peace will not return from one nation’s solo campaign.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Cross-border terror networks] --> P[Threat to world peace] T --> C[Cities aviation finance] U[UNSCR 1373 FATF UN strategy] --> J[Joint global fight] I[Shared intel extradition] --> J N[National police NIA] --> J J --> X[Starve money haven ideology]
Conclusion
Unbridled international terrorism after the 1990s made world peace a city-security problem, not only a battlefield one. 9/11, 26/11, and franchise attacks proved that havens, money, and ideas travel. Every nation must join through UNSCR 1373, FATF, shared intelligence, and lawful policing — a fight to the last safe haven and the last financing node, not a one-season war.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
“Nuclear deterrence is the only effective alternative to counter the deadly genocidal nuclear weapons.” Analytically explain this statement.
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q12). View answer →
-
Can one powerful State end international terrorism alone?
No. Money, passports, and propaganda cross borders. UNSCR 1373 and FATF exist because a solo raid does not close the network.
-
Does ‘fight unto the last’ mean endless war without law?
No. The quotation demands persistence against havens and finance. Due process is part of the strategy, or recruitment grows.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q19 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Narco-terrorism has emerged as a serious threat across the country. Suggest suitable measures to counter it. -
2022 · Q19 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Explain in detail the state of insurgency in North-Eastern India after independence. -
2021 · Q9 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What is meant by insurgency? Explain. -
2021 · Q10 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Role of media and social networking is important in internal security. Analyse. -
2021 · Q18 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Terrorism and corruption hinder the internal security of any nation. Critically examine. -
2020 · Q8 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
'Narco-Terrorism' is a threat to India's internal security. Discuss it. -
2020 · Q17 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Explain the steps taken by the government to counter Naxalism in India. -
2019 · Q2 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Analyse corruption as a threat to internal security.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Explain with examples the role of science and technology in enhancing national power.
Science and technology in daily life
National power is military, economic, and legitimacy capacity; S&T now sits in all three. Nuclear and space programmes illustrate strategic autonomy after 1998 and ISRO/NavIC. Agronomy and pharma cut food and health vulnerability. Digital rails and IT enlarge fiscal reach and export skill. Power follows organised use of knowledge, not laboratory prestige alone.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Analyse corruption as a threat to internal security.
Internal security
Internal security needs order, borders, and public consent; corruption attacks all three. Bribes move arms, narcotics, and wanted persons through police and customs posts. Graft in recruitment and procurement creates insiders and hollow equipment. Lost trust in FIR and welfare is recruited by crime and extremist networks. Lokpal, CVC, DBT, e-procurement, and fast uniformed trials are security tools, not only ethics.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
'Armed Forces Special Powers Act' of the Parliament of India has come under criticism by the States as being draconian and sometimes as unconstitutional. Examine analytically.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
AFSPA 1958 notifies a disturbed area and gives armed forces fire, search, and arrest powers. Section 6 prior sanction is criticised as de facto immunity. States say law and order is theirs, yet the Army overlays policing for years. NPMHR 1997 upheld the Act with review and dos-and-don’ts; EEVFAM 2016 denied encounter immunity. Jeevan Reddy 2005 found the Act too sweeping; validity on paper is not the same as justice on the ground.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.