Revision summary
Food security is access to enough safe, diverse food, not only a full FCI godown. India’s grain self-sufficiency in a normal year coexists with anaemia, leakages, and climate risk. NFSA is the legal calorie floor; pulses, millets, and POSHAN must complete the plate. Honest last-mile delivery and wages decide whether a surplus reaches a poor kitchen. Irrigation, storage, and less wastage remove the stability shock.
Model answer
Introduction
Food security is not a full godown. It is reliable access to enough safe, nutritious food for every household, in drought and in boom. India solved the 1960s famine-scare with Green Revolution grain and a public buffer. The remaining challenges are nutrition, last-mile leakage, climate, and the poor’s purchasing power — not a national absence of wheat and rice in a normal year.
Body
Challenges
- Availability: production is cereal-heavy; pulses, oilseeds, fruits, and animal protein still swing with rain, price, and import.
- Access: a wage or a ration card, not a national surplus, feeds a household; informal workers and excluded names on the list still go hungry beside a full FCI stack.
- Nutrition: calorie security is not protein, micronutrient, or diet-diversity security; anaemia and stunting can coexist with a grain mountain.
- Stability: monsoon breaks, heat, flood, and storage loss (including wastage in the chain) make this year’s plenty next year’s scare.
- Leakage and quality: ghost cards, diversion, and poor-quality grain at the shop undermine NFSA as a lived right.
- Smallholder risk: without irrigation, insurance, and a fair mandi, the producer who grows the surplus can herself be food-insecure between harvests.
How they can be removed
- Honour NFSA as a legal grain floor, with Aadhaar-authenticated but grievance-friendly delivery so genuine households are not struck off.
- Keep an FCI-and-State buffer, but rebalance procurement toward pulses and millets so the plate is not only rice-wheat.
- ICDS, midday meals, POSHAN-type micronutrient work, and women’s anaemia programmes must sit beside the ration shop.
- Climate: PMKSY and watersheds, heat-tolerant varieties, and warehouse-and-silo modernisation cut production and storage shocks.
- Livelihood: MGNREGA and farm-gate prices raise access; food security fails if the poor cannot buy vegetables even when grain is free.
- Reduce wastage with cold chains for perishables and scientific storage for grain; a rotting tomato is also a food-security failure.
Food security is therefore a production-plus-entitlement-plus-nutrition system. Removing challenges means fixing the plate and the last mile, not only announcing a record harvest.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Availability grain buffer] --> FS[Food security] B[Access NFSA wage] --> FS N[Nutrition millets pulses] --> FS C[Climate storage leak] --> X[Challenge] X --> R[PMKSY POSHAN last mile] R --> FS
Conclusion
India’s food-security challenges are nutrition gaps, access and leakage, climate swings, and cereal bias — not a normal-year absence of grain. Removal is NFSA delivered honestly, a diverse buffer, POSHAN and school meals, irrigation and storage, and wages that buy a full plate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Evaluate in brief the agriculture marketing reforms in India. Are they adequate?
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q18). View answer →
-
If FCI godowns are full, is India food-secure?
Not fully. Stocks are availability. Access, nutrition, and leakages still decide whether a child eats a diverse diet.
-
Can a bigger wheat harvest end stunting?
No. Stunting needs protein, sanitation, care, and micronutrients, not only more cereal.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q18 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Describe in detail the issues of nuclear proliferation and the existing control mechanism. -
2020 · Q20 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
At present, in emerging security challenges, how can nuclear weapons be advantageous in India's security management? Explain. -
2019 · Q7 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What are the causes of industrial sickness in India? Give suitable suggestions to overcome the problem. -
2019 · Q12 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
“Nuclear deterrence is the only effective alternative to counter the deadly genocidal nuclear weapons.” Analytically explain this statement. -
2018 · Q8 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Discuss the corrective strategies needed to win the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) doctrine affected citizens back into the mainstream of social and economic growth. -
2018 · Q14 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
“Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are the drivers of economic growth and employment proliferation in India.” Examine this statement. -
2018 · Q18 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Discuss the challenges of National Security in the age of Globalization. -
2018 · Q20 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Write a note on the challenges and their solutions for Law and Order in Uttar Pradesh at the present time.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Explain with examples the role of science and technology in enhancing national power.
Science and technology in daily life
National power is military, economic, and legitimacy capacity; S&T now sits in all three. Nuclear and space programmes illustrate strategic autonomy after 1998 and ISRO/NavIC. Agronomy and pharma cut food and health vulnerability. Digital rails and IT enlarge fiscal reach and export skill. Power follows organised use of knowledge, not laboratory prestige alone.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Analyse corruption as a threat to internal security.
Internal security
Internal security needs order, borders, and public consent; corruption attacks all three. Bribes move arms, narcotics, and wanted persons through police and customs posts. Graft in recruitment and procurement creates insiders and hollow equipment. Lost trust in FIR and welfare is recruited by crime and extremist networks. Lokpal, CVC, DBT, e-procurement, and fast uniformed trials are security tools, not only ethics.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
'Armed Forces Special Powers Act' of the Parliament of India has come under criticism by the States as being draconian and sometimes as unconstitutional. Examine analytically.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
AFSPA 1958 notifies a disturbed area and gives armed forces fire, search, and arrest powers. Section 6 prior sanction is criticised as de facto immunity. States say law and order is theirs, yet the Army overlays policing for years. NPMHR 1997 upheld the Act with review and dos-and-don’ts; EEVFAM 2016 denied encounter immunity. Jeevan Reddy 2005 found the Act too sweeping; validity on paper is not the same as justice on the ground.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.