Q15 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2018 · GS III · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q14 Q16 →

Explain the inter-regional disparities in economic development of Uttar Pradesh and discuss the factors acting as obstacles in the development of backward regions.

Topic: Economic planning and NITI Aayog. Syllabus: Economic planning in India: objectives and achievements. Role of NITI Aayog, Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Economic planning and NITI Aayog.

Revision summary

Uttar Pradesh has four development faces: irrigated industrial west, mixed centre, dense poor east, and drought-hit Bundelkhand. Disparity shows up in jobs, urbanisation, and the need to migrate for wages. Backward regions are blocked by water extremes, last-mile infrastructure, thin banks, and weaker schools. Investment historically followed existing hubs, so the gap reproduced itself. Region-specific water, flood, skill, and logistics packages beat a single statewide template.

Model answer

Introduction

Uttar Pradesh is not one economy. Western districts along the Yamuna–Ganga doab and the NCR fringe run a denser mix of agriculture, industry, and services. Eastern UP (Purvanchal) and Bundelkhand remain poorer, more rural, and more dependent on out-migration. Inter-regional disparity is this gap in income, jobs, human capital, and public goods — not a cultural insult to any belt, but a map of investment and ecology.

Body

The regional pattern

  • Western UP: higher irrigation density, sugarcane–wheat belts, small-town manufacturing, and NCR spillover (Ghaziabad–Noida–Meerut) give relatively higher incomes and urbanisation.
  • Central UP: Lucknow as an administrative-services hub and Kanpur as a historic industrial city sit between the two extremes; many adjoining districts still look agrarian and under-industrialised.
  • Eastern UP: high population density, flood-prone tracts, weaker factories, and a long tradition of labour migration to Mumbai, Delhi, and the Gulf; agriculture is often small-plot and rain-sensitive.
  • Bundelkhand: drought, thin soils, distressed farming, and sparse industry produce a different backwardness — water and livelihood collapse rather than only flood.

Obstacles in backward regions

  • Water: Bundelkhand’s rainfall variability and eastern floods both destroy the farm surplus that would fund local industry; irrigation and drainage are unfinished.
  • Infrastructure: poor last-mile roads, unreliable power, and thin rail-freight access raise the cost of a factory relative to western belts already on the Delhi corridor.
  • Human capital: school completion, skills, and health indicators lag, so even a new industrial park cannot find a ready workforce and professionals leave.
  • Law, land, and credit: delayed land assembly, weaker bank branches, and a reputation for dispute or crime raise the risk premium that investors price in.
  • Governance and public investment historically followed existing agglomeration: universities, medical colleges, and PSUs clustered where the State already sat, widening the gap.
  • Social structure and out-migration: remittances keep households alive but can reduce pressure for local jobs; caste and gender barriers also ration who gets the scarce formal post.

Closing the gap needs region-specific packages — Bundelkhand water and drought-proofing, Purvanchal flood control and agro-industry, and eastern skill-plus-logistics — not a single Lucknow-centric scheme copied everywhere.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  W[Western UP NCR industry irrigation] --> H[Higher income urban]
  E[Purvanchal flood small plots] --> M[Out-migration]
  B[Bundelkhand drought] --> L[Livelihood stress]
  I[Thin power roads credit skills] --> E
  I --> B

Conclusion

  • UP’s development is regionally split: a relatively dynamic west and NCR fringe versus poorer east and Bundelkhand, with central districts mixed. Backwardness is held by water stress or flood, thin infrastructure and credit, weaker skills, and historic under-investment. The obstacle is not one community; it is a missing bundle of irrigation, roads, schools, and investible peace.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2018 · Q1 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    Evaluate the effects of globalization on industrial development in India.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q2 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog.

    View answer →

  3. 2018 · Q3 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    Throw light on the ‘Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in India’.

    View answer →

  4. 2018 · Q4 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    What is Pradhanmantri Kisan Sampada (SAMPADA) Yojana? Mention its objectives and provisions.

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q9 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    Elaborate on the ‘National Defence Council’ of India.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q10 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

    What is the Public Private Partnership Model in defence?

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q11 · UPGS3 · 12 marks

    Examine the major provisions of U.P. Skill Development Mission. Mention the status of its implementation.

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q12 · UPGS3 · 12 marks

    Write a note on the “Problem of Equilibrium between Economic Development and Carbon Emission.”

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

Evaluate the effects of globalization on industrial development in India.

Economic planning and NITI Aayog

1991 reforms and WTO entry opened Indian industry to trade, capital, and technology. Autos, pharma, telecom, and organised engineering gained FDI, quality, and exports. MSMEs in labour-intensive lines faced cheap imports and informal labour. Factory growth clustered in a few belts; manufacturing’s GDP share stayed modest. The effect is mixed capability, not uniform industrialisation.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog.

Economic planning and NITI Aayog

NITI Aayog’s 2017 draft NEP folds existing RE and climate pledges into one energy frame. 175 GW by 2022: 100 GW solar, 60 GW wind, 10 GW bio-power, 5 GW small hydro. About 40 per cent non-fossil electricity capacity by 2030 is the Paris-linked target. 24×7 power for all and village electrification are the access companions. Corridors, bidding, and must-run status turn capacity targets into generation.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks

Throw light on the ‘Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in India’.

Economic planning and NITI Aayog

SDGs are seventeen 2030 UN goals; India maps them onto existing Union and State schemes. NITI Aayog coordinates and publishes the SDG India Index; MoSPI builds indicators. Poverty, health, education, water, energy, and climate goals ride on named flagships. Large inter-State gaps remain on nutrition, learning, and air. Pursuit is federal delivery, not a separate UN ministry.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.