Revision summary
1991 reforms and WTO entry opened Indian industry to trade, capital, and technology. Autos, pharma, telecom, and organised engineering gained FDI, quality, and exports. MSMEs in labour-intensive lines faced cheap imports and informal labour. Factory growth clustered in a few belts; manufacturing’s GDP share stayed modest. The effect is mixed capability, not uniform industrialisation.
Model answer
Introduction
Globalization, after the 1991 reforms and WTO entry, opened Indian industry to trade, capital, and technology. Evaluation must weigh faster output, exports, and modern sectors against import pressure on small units, regional clustering, and weaker labour protection.
Body
Gains for industry
- Liberalisation cut industrial licensing and allowed FDI, which modernised automobiles, telecom equipment, pharmaceuticals, and information-technology-enabled manufacturing.
- Export orientation and global value chains raised quality standards, scale in steel, chemicals, and engineering, and access to imported capital goods.
- Special Economic Zones, later Make in India, and services–industry linkages pulled some clusters into world markets and raised productivity in organised factories.
- Competition forced a section of Indian firms to invest in R&D, branding, and process control rather than sheltered inefficiency.
Costs and unevenness
- Cheap imports, especially after China’s WTO accession, squeezed labour-intensive small and cottage units in toys, electronics assembly, and some textiles.
- Industry concentrated in a few coastal and metro belts; inland and eastern States gained less factory employment.
- Informalisation, contract labour, and weaker collective bargaining rose even where organised output grew.
- Environmental load and land conflicts around large projects are part of the same opening, not a side-effect that can be ignored.
Balanced reading
- Globalization did not de-industrialise India as a whole; manufacturing’s share of GDP stayed modest while services raced ahead, which is itself an incomplete industrial transition.
- The effect is therefore mixed: capability and export in a few sectors, fragility for MSMEs without credit, design, and logistics support.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Globalization 1991 WTO] --> P[FDI tech exports] G --> N[Import pressure MSME] G --> R[Regional clustering] P --> I[Industrial development mixed] N --> I R --> I
Conclusion
Globalization raised technology, FDI, and export capacity in selected industries, but it also exposed small units to import competition and left factory jobs regionally uneven. The evaluation is therefore not a simple success story: industrial development improved where firms could plug into world markets, and lagged where policy did not cushion MSMEs, skills, and infrastructure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did globalization destroy Indian industry?
No. Organised output and some export sectors grew. The damage was concentrated in unprotected small units and in the slow rise of factory jobs.
-
Is FDI the same as industrial development?
FDI can bring capital and technology. Development also needs domestic linkages, skills, and a rising manufacturing share of employment.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q2 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog. -
2018 · Q3 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Throw light on the ‘Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in India’. -
2018 · Q4 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What is Pradhanmantri Kisan Sampada (SAMPADA) Yojana? Mention its objectives and provisions. -
2018 · Q9 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Elaborate on the ‘National Defence Council’ of India. -
2018 · Q10 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What is the Public Private Partnership Model in defence? -
2018 · Q11 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Examine the major provisions of U.P. Skill Development Mission. Mention the status of its implementation. -
2018 · Q12 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Write a note on the “Problem of Equilibrium between Economic Development and Carbon Emission.” -
2018 · Q15 · UPGS3 · 12 marks
Explain the inter-regional disparities in economic development of Uttar Pradesh and discuss the factors acting as obstacles in the development of backward regions.
More from this paper
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Describe the targets of energy generation through renewable energy sources in accordance with National Energy Policy 2017 drafted by NITI Aayog.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
NITI Aayog’s 2017 draft NEP folds existing RE and climate pledges into one energy frame. 175 GW by 2022: 100 GW solar, 60 GW wind, 10 GW bio-power, 5 GW small hydro. About 40 per cent non-fossil electricity capacity by 2030 is the Paris-linked target. 24×7 power for all and village electrification are the access companions. Corridors, bidding, and must-run status turn capacity targets into generation.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Throw light on the ‘Pursuit of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in India’.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
SDGs are seventeen 2030 UN goals; India maps them onto existing Union and State schemes. NITI Aayog coordinates and publishes the SDG India Index; MoSPI builds indicators. Poverty, health, education, water, energy, and climate goals ride on named flagships. Large inter-State gaps remain on nutrition, learning, and air. Pursuit is federal delivery, not a separate UN ministry.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What is Pradhanmantri Kisan Sampada (SAMPADA) Yojana? Mention its objectives and provisions.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
SAMPADA is MoFPI’s 2017 umbrella for agro-marine processing and clusters. It funds infrastructure, not a universal farmer cash transfer. Objectives: cut wastage, raise processing and farmer income, create jobs and safe surplus. Components: Mega Food Parks, cold chain, unit expansion, clusters, linkages, labs, HR. About ₹6,000 crore was the original 2016–20 Union outlay.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.