Q4 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2021 · Essay · 50 marks · ~700 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q3 Q5 →

New Agriculture Laws and Peasant Movement.

Topic: Science, environment, economy and agriculture. Syllabus: Section B — Science, Environment and Technology; Economic sphere; Agriculture, Industry and Trade. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Science, environment, economy and agriculture.

Essay map

Opening scene

Anecdote

A highway camp and a Gazette that many did not trust. 2021’s farm-law winter was a lesson in federal agriculture and a republic’s ear. The essay is not a team jersey. It is why a movement could sit through a fog. A law can be a market. A movement can be a bill unpaid. Reform with a floor and an ear, or the field becomes only a fire.

Keep this in every paragraph

One stand

  • Three laws’ stated aim: trade, a contract, a stock. Movement: Punjab-Haryana-UP edges, a MSP fear. Cool chronology; no insult.

Turn each heading into a full paragraph in the hall

Heading map

What the line is asking

  • Laws as a policy. Movement as a democratic fact.

Content / process

  • Market access vs a APMC fear. A committee that was late.

The counter

Romantic blockade that hurts a perishable. And a government that treats a tractor as sedition.

Floor and ear

  • The three laws as a design: trade, stock, contract — write as a map, not a party sheet.
  • Peasant movement as a voice of risk: MSP as a political floor, a mill arrear.
  • Repeal is a fact of 2021; the agrarian question did not repeal.
  • Ear: a federal farm, a small holder, a woman on the title.

Drop one peg where it fits — not a data dump

Value addition

  • Farm Acts 2020 The file — then the camp.
  • MSP / APMC The fear and the old mandi.
  • Art. 19 / 21 Protest as a liberty with a public order line.
  • Federal agri State list / entry 14 cousin.
  • Repeal 2021 Outcome as a political fact — cool.

Last 8–10 lines in the exam

Last paragraph

New agriculture laws and the peasant movement were a collision between a market design and a memory of risk. A law that opens a gate can still feel like a theft if the floor is a rumour and the mill already sits on dues. The movement was not anti-science; it was an ear demanding a price and a federal respect. Repeal closed a chapter; the question of who bears a glut did not close. Close on reform with a floor and an ear. That is how a field stays a republic, not only a fire on a border.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Citizenship Amendment Act and Inclusive India.

    Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Full 700-word essay?

    No. Map only. In the hall, grow each heading; write in English or Hindi, not both.

  • Tone?

    Cool, federal. No jersey. One camp, one Gazette.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q5 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Citizenship Amendment Act and Inclusive India.

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q6 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Effect of change in Global Environment: Challenges and way to go out.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q4 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Water Pollution and Ganga Cleanliness.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q5 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Five trillion dollar Indian Economy: Possibilities and Challenges.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q6 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Indian Agriculture: Towards Evergreen Revolution.

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q4 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Role of social media in public awareness.

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q5 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Digital Economy: possibilities and challenges.

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q6 · UPESS · 50 marks

    Farmers of India: our pride.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPESS · 50 marks

Art and social liberty.

Literature, culture, society and polity

Map. Cancelled play. Stand: liberty is art’s air. Peg Art. 19. Counter: hurt-veto vs a cruel joke.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.