Q10 · UPSC Prelims 2026 · Set A · Art and Culture

← Q9 Q11 →

Consider the following statements about the Rigvedic period:I.Irrigation from wells allowed agriculture to expand away from flood plains and strips on river margins into the present Punjab and Haryana plains having underground water levels reasonably close to the surface.II.Draught-animal power was employed to draw up water out of the wells. Which of the following information support/supports the above statements?1.There is evidence in the Rigveda of the use of ashma chakra (stone pulley wheel) and ahava (strapped wooden pails) to draw up water.2.Mention has been made in the Rigveda of the use of implements like parashu/kulisha (axe) and datra/sreni (sickle).3.There is a history of the use of ox, even before the Rigveda, for ploughing the land and pulling the carts

Page facts
Exam
Union Public Service Commission — Civil Services Examination (UPSC)
Board
UPSC
Stage
Prelims
Year
2026
Paper
UPSC Prelims — Prelims General Studies Paper I (General Studies)
Booklet
Set A
Question
Q10
Topic
Art and Culture
Syllabus
Indian art, architecture, culture — Prelims GS Paper I.
A 1 and 2 only
B 1, 2 and 3
C 1 and 3 only
D 3 only

Correct answer: (c) 1 and 3 only

Explanation

  1. A

    1 and 2 only

    1 and 2 only claims that statements 1 and 2 support the given propositions. While statement 1 is correct regarding the Rigvedic terminology for drawing water, statement 2 refers to agricultural implements like axes and sickles which do not specifically explain irrigation from wells or draught-animal power used for water lifting, making this option incorrect.

  2. B

    1, 2 and 3

    1, 2 and 3 claims all three statements support the propositions. Since statement 2 details general agricultural tools rather than well irrigation or animal-powered water lifting mechanisms, this comprehensive combination is rendered incorrect.

  3. C

    1 and 3 only

    1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is supported by Rigvedic references to ashma chakra (stone pulley wheel) and ahava (strapped wooden pails) used for drawing water. Statement 3 is supported by the historical continuity of utilizing oxen for pulling carts and ploughing the land, which aligns with draught-animal power applications. Hence, both statements directly support the given propositions.

  4. D

    3 only

    3 only claims that only statement 3 supports the propositions. This ignores statement 1, which provides direct textual evidence from the Rigveda regarding well-irrigation implements like the stone pulley wheel, making this option incomplete and incorrect.

Summary. Official key is (c). The question examines material life and technology in the Rigvedic period, supported by textual evidence of well-irrigation devices like the stone pulley and the continuous use of draught animals for agricultural operations, while excluding unrelated tools like general axes and sickles from the irrigation mechanism proof.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2017 · Q2 · General Studies · 2 marks

    With reference to the difference between the culture of Rigvedic Aryans and Indus Valley people, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Rigvedic Aryans used the coat of mail and helmet in warfare whereas the people of Indus Valley Civilization did not leave any evidence of using them. 2. Rigvedic Aryans knew gold, silver and copper whereas Indus Valley people knew only copper and iron. 3. Rigvedic Aryans had domesticated the horse whereas there is no evidence of Indus Valley people having been aware of this animal. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    View answer →

PDF