Explanation
- A
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement- II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
Both correct and II explains I. States running services does not explain a curative tilt; that tilt is a system-design fact.
- B
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement- II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I
Both correct but II does not explain I. Public facilities are still cure-heavy; health is a State subject / State-delivered. One does not explain the other.
- C
Statement-I is correct but Statement- II is incorrect
I correct, II incorrect. States do organise most public health delivery.
- D
Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
I incorrect, II correct. NHP documents have long flagged the curative bias.
Summary. Official key is (b). India’s public system has been described as curative-first, with thinner preventive and rehabilitative arms. Under the Constitution, States organise health services. Decentralisation does not explain the curative bias, so II is not the explanation of I.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.