Q2(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Do you think that in a society like India orthogenetic changes take place through differentiation? Do you observe continuities in the orthogenetic process ? Elaborate your answer with suitable examples

Topic: Politics and Society. Syllabus: Politics and Society: Nation, democracy and citizenship; Political parties, pressure groups, social and political elite; Regionalism and decentralization of politics; Secularization. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2025 and Politics and Society.

Revision summary

Yogendra Singh’s orthogenetic change is transformation generated inside Indian civilisation. Differentiation of roles, jati, household and sect is the main inner mechanism. Sanskritization and Bhakti are examples of mobility and critique on inherited ladders. Continuities appear in marriage, village, and sacred public language even after factories and votes. Western and Islamic contacts are heterogenetic; they are absorbed through this differentiating structure.

Model answer

Introduction

Yogendra Singh argued that Indian society changes from within—orthogenetic change—and not only when the West arrives. That inner change works largely through differentiation: roles, cults and institutions split and specialise, while older meanings hitch a ride. Continuities are therefore not failures of modernity; they are how the orthogenetic process actually looks.

Body

Orthogenetic change and differentiation

Orthogenetic sources include the Little and Great traditions (Redfield via Marriott and Singer), Bhakti and reform, the internal logic of varna–jati, and the long history of statecraft. Differentiation means a priestly role splits from kingship, a jati splits by occupation and region, a joint household throws out a nuclear residential unit, a sect splits from a sampradaya, and a caste association splits from the village panchayat. Sanskritization is orthogenetic mobility: groups rearrange themselves on an inherited ladder rather than inventing class from nothing.

Singh did not deny heterogenetic shocks—Islam, British law, industrial capitalism, the Constitution. He insisted that those shocks are interpreted through an already differentiating civilisation. NEP 2020’s bilingual classroom, electronic voting, and corporate mandirs are intelligible as new specialised institutions wearing old names.

Continuities you can still observe

  • Hierarchy does not vanish when a factory opens. It re-specialises: a dominant caste becomes a political caste; purity rules weaken in the canteen and tighten at marriage. I. P. Desai and A. M. Shah showed family continuity beneath residential split. Village studies after Srinivas show the village remaining a ritual and vote unit even when men live in Surat or Gulf dormitories. Dumont’s encompassing hierarchy is too stiff as a total theory, but the idiom of rank continues in matrimony and food.
  • Examples of continuity-through-differentiation: the Khap using WhatsApp; Jat and Patel agitations mixing agrarian status with OBC demand; Ambedkarite Buddhism as orthogenetic critique using a civilisational repertoire; Ramjanmabhoomi politics as politicised great tradition. Green Revolution technology differentiated kulak from labourer without ending caste in the labour gang.
  • So yes: in a society like India, orthogenetic change proceeds through differentiation. Continuities are the other face of the same process—not a separate “tradition” sitting outside history.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  O[Orthogenetic sources] --> D[Differentiation of roles]
  H[Heterogenetic contact] --> D
  D --> N[New institutions]
  D --> C[Continuities of rank and kin]

Conclusion

  • Singh’s orthogenetic thesis is still usable: India modernises by splitting roles and institutions while recycling hierarchy, kinship and sacred language. Heterogenetic forces matter, but they land on a differentiating old structure. The task is to name both the split and the leftover bond.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • 'Agrarian class structure has been undergoing changes due to modern forces.' Critically examine

    Next question in the 2025 paper (Q2). View answer →

  • Is orthogenetic change the same as sanskritization?

    Sanskritization is one important case. Orthogenetic change also includes sectarian splits, state formation and internal reform.

  • Do continuities mean India is unchanging?

    No. Continuity here means old principles operating in new specialised institutions, which is change with a memory.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    What do you understand by decentralisation of power? What is its role in strengthening the roots of democracy in India? Elaborate

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are pressure groups? Discuss their role in decision-making in democracy

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Do you think that the decades of Dalit political mobilizations and movements have helped in strengthening India's democracy? Substantiate your arguments with facts

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Examine different understandings of secularization in india?

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the role of pressure groups in strengthening democracy.

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Does regionalism essentially lead to decentralization of power? Substantiate your answer with relevant examples

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Is social democracy a precondition for political democracy ? Comment

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What do you understand by democratic federalism? How does it promote decentralization of power in India?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss.

Rural and Agrarian Social Structure

The textual perspective explains Indian society through Dharmashastra, epics and related canons. Ghurye and Dumont used that archive to theorise caste as a hierarchical whole. The approach is strong on civilisational categories and weak on labour, gender and local power. Srinivas’s field view and Desai’s Marxism correct the book without discarding it. Texts remain part of the social system because groups still quote them in law and ritual.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Justify that the Indian traditions are modernizing. Also discuss its contributing factors.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Yogendra Singh treats modernization of Indian tradition as internal and external change together. Sanskritization, westernization and the Rudolphs’ modernity of tradition describe recasting, not simple death. Law, education, media, the developmental state and the post-1991 market are the main levers. Caste, household and religion persist in new organisational forms. Unevenness remains: mobility in class can coexist with control in marriage.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

According to you, which social reform movement has played the most effective role in uplifting the status of women? Explain.

Social Movements in Modern India

The most effective women’s social reform is the Phule–Ambedkar anti-caste line, not only bhadralok campaigns. It tied girls’ education, a critique of endogamy, and constitutional legal personhood. Sati abolition and widow remarriage opened the public question but had a narrower class-caste base. Hindu Code, later feminist litigation and Shah Bano debates inherit that citizenship frame. Patriarchy continues; effectiveness means a changed legal and educational grammar, not a finished utopia.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.