Q7(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks · 3 min read

← Q6 Q7 →

Analyse the trilogy between environmental movement, development, and tribal identity

Topic: Social Movements in Modern India. Syllabus: Social Movements in Modern India: Peasants and farmers movements; Women’s movement; Backward classes and Dalit movement; Environmental movements; Ethnicity and Identity movements. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Social Movements in Modern India.

Revision summary

The trilogy means development, environment and tribal identity define one another on the ground. Dams, mines and parks have displaced Adivasis in the name of the nation. Chipko, Narmada and Niyamgiri joined livelihood, ecology and peoplehood. FRA and PESA are legal attempts to institutionalise that join. Urban green talk that drops tribe and class misunderstands Indian environmentalism.

Model answer

Introduction

Environmental movement, development, and tribal identity form a trilogy because each term defines the other two in central India and the Himalaya. ‘Development’ as dam, mine, plantation or park arrives on Adivasi land. The protest is called environmental in the city and is lived as identity, livelihood and sacred geography in the village. Virginius Xaxa and Guha–Gadgil help us keep all three in one analysis.

Body

Development as dispossession

Post-Independence planning treated forests and rivers as national stock. Dams on the Narmada, mines in Odisha, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, and protected areas produced development-induced displacement. Tribal identity is not a costume. It is a relation to land, myth, clan and language. When the hill is mined, identity is attacked, not only income. The Fifth Schedule, PESA and FRA exist because this was already known and still happens.

Environmentalism and identity

Chipko is often remembered as tree-hugging. In the hills it was also peasant and women’s control of forests against commercial felling—identity as pahari livelihood. Narmada combined environmental critique of large dams with adivasi and peasant displacement. Niyamgiri fused Dongria Kondh sacred identity, biodiversity, and a no to bauxite. Pathalgadi and related assertions mix constitutional Schedule identity with resistance to land laws.

Urban climate discourse can strip these movements of tribe and class and keep only carbon. That is a sociological error. Conversely, identity politics without ecology can bargain for a share of mining royalties and still lose the forest. The trilogy is the claim that you cannot analyse one vertex alone.

How the three now interlock

The state offers development as jobs and roads; companies offer CSR; security forces treat some belts as insurgency. Environmental law (EIA, Forest Conservation) is the paperwork of the same conflict. Tribal identity becomes a legal resource (ST, FRA claims) and a stigma (primitive, anti-national). Movements succeed when they join Gram Sabha legality, ecological knowledge, and a public story the rest of India can hear.

Mining belts also show the trilogy inside the movement. Some households want jobs in the plant; some want the sacred grove left alone; women often carry both the water shortage and the protest. The state then offers cash and a public hearing. Development becomes a language of compensation; environment becomes a file in the ministry; identity becomes an ST certificate. The trilogy is the refusal to let those three files stay separate.

  • The trilogy also includes internal difference: tribal elites, Christian and sarna splits, and women who carry water and oppose liquor and mines in different ways. A trilogy is not a harmony.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  DEV[Development projects] --> LAND[Tribal land and forest]
  ID[Tribal identity] --> LAND
  ENV[Environmental movement] --> LAND
  LAND --> CON[Trilogy of conflict and claim]

Conclusion

Environmental movements, development projects and tribal identity are one structure of conflict over land and meaning. Development that ignores identity is dispossession; environmentalism that ignores tribe is aesthetic; identity that ignores ecology can sell the hill. FRA and Gram Sabha consent are the institutional names of the trilogy.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    According to you, which social reform movement has played the most effective role in uplifting the status of women? Explain.

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    How Dalit movements in India have facilitated their Identity formation? Analyze

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    What is your assessment about the recent farmers' movement in India? Elaborate.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Trace the social and historical origins of Dalit movements in modern India

    View answer →

  5. 2024 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Highlight the major contributions of the reform movements in pre-independent India

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss the challenges faced by the cooperative movements in India. Suggest measures to strengthen the movement at the grass-roots level

    View answer →

  7. 2022 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Define ethnicity . Discuss the factors responsible for the growth of ethenic movements in India.

    View answer →

  8. 2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Bring out the various issues involved in Dalit movements in India.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

What, according to you, are the factors responsible for the continuance of caste system in India? Explain.

Caste System

Caste continues as organisation and ideology, not only as village custom. Ambedkar’s endogamy, Dumont’s hierarchy, and Ghurye’s features still describe marriage, food and stigma. Srinivas showed mobility inside caste; Béteille and Desai linked it to land, class and power. The Constitution and reservations recast caste as a political identity rather than simply erasing it. Markets and cities loosened occupation more than they loosened kinship.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Discuss the changes taking place in the industrial class structure in India.

Social Classes in India

The older industrial class was a minority organised mill and PSU workforce. Mills declined; contract labour, circular migration and job work expanded. Services and IT added a salariat above a large informal industrial and logistics workforce. Caste and gender still sort who enters secure versus hazardous work. Unions lost the mill colony world and have only partly regrouped.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks

Is patriarchy a key to understanding different forms of inequalities in Indian society? Elaborate.

Perspectives on the study of Indian society

Patriarchy is a structure of control over labour, sexuality and status, not only prejudice. Uma Chakravarti’s Brahmanical patriarchy links caste honour to the regulation of women. Ambedkar’s endogamy thesis makes gender central to caste reproduction. Class inequalities run through unpaid care and segmented female work. The state both reforms and reproduces gender through personal law and welfare.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.