Revision summary
Descent places people in a lineage or gotra for ritual and property. Alliance treats marriage as structured exchange between groups. Karve and Dumont contrast a northern agnatic-exogamous field with southern Dravidian cross-cousin alliance. Kerala matriliny shows descent is not everywhere patrilineal. Modern markets mix residence without erasing these rules.
Model answer
Introduction
Descent traces who belongs to a kin corporation across generations. Alliance traces how groups are linked by marriage. North and South Indian systems both use descent and alliance, but they organise the marriage field differently.
Body
Descent
- Descent is the rule that assigns a person to a lineage, clan, or gotra for property, ritual, and often surname.
- North Indian kinship is strongly agnatic in the classical model: a man belongs to his father’s line; a woman marries out and is incorporated into her husband’s line for many ritual purposes.
- Clan and gotra exogamy forbid marriage inside a named descent set even when the village is large.
Alliance
- Alliance theory, associated with Claude Levi-Strauss and used on India by Louis Dumont, treats marriage as a lasting exchange between groups, not only as a contract of two persons.
- South Indian Dravidian kinship prefers cross-cousin marriage, so the same groups repeat alliance across generations.
- Dumont argued that South Indian caste and kinship make alliance a structural principle, whereas the north stresses hypergamy and wife-givers ranked below wife-takers.
North versus South, with examples
- Irawati Karve mapped this regional contrast: Indo-Aryan north versus Dravidian south, with intermediate zones.
- North: village exogamy in much of the Hindi belt, gotra rules, and a bride who travels to her husband’s village; the mother’s brother’s daughter may be forbidden as too close in some groups and preferred in others, but parallel-cousin marriage is widely barred.
- South: Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam Dravidian systems often prefer mother’s brother’s daughter; the bride may already be a known affine, and the in-law relationship is pre-built.
- Kerala’s historical matriliny among some groups (for example Nayar taravad in older ethnography) shows that descent itself can be matrilineal, which is not the north Indian default.
- Marriott-style interaction still matters: who eats with affines differs by region, but caste endogamy frames both systems.
Modern pressure
- Law, migration, and matrimonial markets mix the two maps. A Tamil software household in Bengaluru may still ask about cross-cousin eligibility; a Haryana household may still refuse same-village matches.
- Honour disputes follow these maps when a match violates village exogamy or caste alliance rules.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DE[Descent clan gotra] --> N[North village exogamy hypergamy] AL[Alliance repeated marriage] --> S[South cross-cousin Dravidian] N --> C[Caste endogamy] S --> C
Conclusion
Descent assigns corporate belonging; alliance organises marriage exchange. North Indian kinship leans on agnatic descent, village exogamy, and hypergamy. South Indian Dravidian kinship leans on repeated cross-cousin alliance. Both remain caste-bound.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the concept of Sanskritization with suitable illustrations
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Do all South Indians practise cross-cousin marriage?
No. It is a structural preference in many Dravidian systems, not a universal daily fact, and law plus class now mix patterns.
-
Is alliance absent in the north?
No. North Indian groups also exchange women between villages and clans. The south more often repeats the same alliance.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the conceptual issues about lineage and descent in India. Give suitable illustrations ,
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Highlight the significant features of A.R. Desai's 'Dialectical Perspective' to study Indian Society
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai studies Indian society as historical materialism, not as a harmonious village. Caste and custom are read as ideology over agrarian class. The colonial and planning state are part of the contradiction, not neutral umpires. Village studies of consensus are criticised as incomplete. The method is strong on land, labour, and struggle.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"The decade of 1950s was the golden period of village studies in Indian Sociology." Explain the statement
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The 1950s joined planning, Community Development, and intensive village ethnography. Srinivas, Dube, Marriott, Bailey, Mayer and others built the classic monographs. Dominant caste, factions, and the field view came from this decade. The village was treated as a keyhole to Indian society. Beteille and class analysis later limited that claim.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyse the differences between the attributional and interactional approach in studying the caste system
Caste System
Attributional caste scores groups by listed traits such as diet, occupation and ritual. Ghurye and colonial lists exemplify that approach. Interactional caste ranks groups by who gives and receives food, service and honour. Marriott, Dumont and Srinivas made interaction the test of hierarchy. Lived rank can diverge from textbook attributes.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.