Revision summary
Early elites were professional, urban and often upper caste. Dominant-caste rural notables joined under mass franchise. Mandal, BSP and regional parties diversified the caste profile. Liberalisation mixed business and office. Dynasty, money and weak gender-minority presence continue to close the top.
Model answer
Introduction
Political elites in India have changed from a small English-educated nationalist circle toward a more regional, caste-inclusive, and money-mediated set. The summit still looks narrow. The recruiting ground has widened.
Body
Older structure
- The nationalist elite that Desai analysed was professional, urban, and often upper caste, speaking a constitutional all-India language.
- After independence, the Congress system added rural notables: dominant castes in Srinivas’s sense who could deliver the village vote.
- Ghurye’s civilisational Brahmanical lens fits the early cultural capital of this elite, not its later composition.
What changed
- Adult franchise, Mandal, and BSP-type mobilisation brought OBC and Dalit elites into assemblies and cabinets, a disharmonic opening Beteille would recognise: equality as creed, hierarchy as residual honour.
- Linguistic states and regional parties federalised the elite. A chief minister’s court can matter more than a Delhi salon.
- Land reform and Green Revolution created rich-peasant politicians. Co-operatives and farmer unions became elite nurseries.
- Liberalisation added business-politician overlap, media owners, and contractors. Informal money sits beside formal office.
- Women entered through reservation at panchayat level more than at the top, so gender change is bottom-heavy.
Continuities
- Kinship and dynasty still organise many parties.
- Corporate and upper-caste networks remain thick in bureaucracy and national media, even when the MLA is from a new jati.
- Adivasi and Muslim representation in high office stays thin relative to population in many states.
Structure now
- A multi-layered elite: national professional-business, regional caste-peasant, and local panchayat. Circulation has increased. Closure has not ended.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD OE[Nationalist professional elite] --> DC[Dominant caste rural notables] DC --> NE[Regional OBC Dalit business elites] NE --> DY[Dynasty and money closure]
Conclusion
The structure of political elites has changed from a nationalist professional core plus dominant-caste brokers toward a federal, caste-diversified, and more monetised elite. Democracy widened recruitment. Property, dynasty, and media still filter who stays.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Instead of promoting equality in society , the present system of education itself has contributed to increased socio economic disparities" Comment .
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Has the elite been democratised?
Recruitment is wider by caste and region. Wealth and family still weigh heavily.
-
Are bureaucrats part of the political elite?
They are a power elite overlapping politics. The political elite proper is those who hold or directly broker elective office.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate on M.N. Srinivas's structural functionalist approach to the study of Indian society. -
2022 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain Leela Dube's concept of "Seed and Earth" -
2022 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine GS Ghurye's Indological approach to the understanding of Indian society. -
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the material basis of patriarchy as an ideological system. -
2022 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss Law as an important instrument for women's empowerment. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss recent trends in the structure of migration . -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the dialectics between 'development and environment'. -
2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate on M.N. Srinivas's structural functionalist approach to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Srinivas replaced a book view of India with a field view from villages such as Rampura. Structure is observed groups; function is how custom holds them together. Dominant caste and Sanskritization explain local power and mobility inside caste. Westernization and politics add new resources without erasing the village system. Conflict theorists say the method underplays class.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations.
Social Classes in India
Intermediary landlordism declined after land reform. A commercial rich-peasant layer grew in Green Revolution regions. Labour is more migrant and informal, as COVID reverse flows showed. Caste-land overlap and landlessness persist. The structure is changing, not ending.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the challenges of integration for tribal communities in india.
Tribal communities in India
Ghurye’s assimilation and Elwin’s protection still frame the debate. Nehruvian integration promised partnership; projects often meant loss of land. Schedules, PESA and the Forest Rights Act are the legal path. Displacement, language loss and a thin elite are the main social risks. Integration must be citizenship with resources, not cultural wipe-out.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.