Revision summary
Srinivas replaced a book view of India with a field view from villages such as Rampura. Structure is observed groups; function is how custom holds them together. Dominant caste and Sanskritization explain local power and mobility inside caste. Westernization and politics add new resources without erasing the village system. Conflict theorists say the method underplays class.
Model answer
Introduction
M. N. Srinivas studied Indian society as a living structure of caste, kinship, and village, not as a book of sacred rules. His structural functionalism asks how parts fit, and how they change without the whole collapsing.
Body
Field view, not book view
- Srinivas opposed an Indological India made only of texts. Rampura showed caste, faction, and ritual as observed relations.
- Structure is the network of groups and statuses. Function is the contribution of a custom to order, as in village festivals that knit patrons and clients.
- He kept Radcliffe-Brown’s concern with solidarity, but he put mobility inside the structure through Sanskritization.
Indian tools of the method
- Dominant caste in Rampura joined land, numbers, and local office; ritual rank alone did not decide who ran the village.
- Sanskritization is a functional path: a jati copies the style of a higher local model and still stays inside caste, rather than leaving it.
- Westernization and the vote add new resources. The village remains a system, but the ranking of parts can shift.
Limit
- A. R. Desai and later conflict sociologists said harmony language underplays class and landlord power.
- Andre Beteille’s Sripuram work kept structure but stressed inequality as disharmony, not as a smooth function.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FV[Field view Rampura] --> ST[Caste kinship village] ST --> DC[Dominant caste] ST --> SK[Sanskritization] SK --> CH[Change inside structure]
Conclusion
- Srinivas’s structural functionalism is a field method: map groups, show what a custom does, and allow ranked change. It is strongest on caste and village, and weakest if class struggle is treated as noise.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is Srinivas only a functionalist of harmony?
No. Sanskritization and dominant caste are about competition. He still frames change as adjustment of a structure, not as revolution.
-
Does the method deny texts?
It denies that texts are enough. Villagers use texts, but rank is decided in interaction.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain Leela Dube's concept of "Seed and Earth" -
2022 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine GS Ghurye's Indological approach to the understanding of Indian society. -
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the material basis of patriarchy as an ideological system. -
2022 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss Law as an important instrument for women's empowerment. -
2022 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of structure of political elites. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss recent trends in the structure of migration . -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the dialectics between 'development and environment'. -
2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
More from this paper
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Do you agree that the agrarian class structure in India is changing ?Justify your answer with illustrations.
Social Classes in India
Intermediary landlordism declined after land reform. A commercial rich-peasant layer grew in Green Revolution regions. Labour is more migrant and informal, as COVID reverse flows showed. Caste-land overlap and landlessness persist. The structure is changing, not ending.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elucidate the challenges of integration for tribal communities in india.
Tribal communities in India
Ghurye’s assimilation and Elwin’s protection still frame the debate. Nehruvian integration promised partnership; projects often meant loss of land. Schedules, PESA and the Forest Rights Act are the legal path. Displacement, language loss and a thin elite are the main social risks. Integration must be citizenship with resources, not cultural wipe-out.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
In the context of changing Indian society, how do you view Andre Beteille's conceptions of harmonic and disharmonic social structures ?
Caste System
Harmonic structure legitimates inequality in its own values. Disharmonic structure proclaims equality while inequality continues. Sripuram showed this clash after land reform and democracy. Changing India lives in disharmony: law versus ranked honour. The tension is the field of politics, not a temporary error.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.