Revision summary
Development uses nature as a cheap input and meets ecological and social limits. Chipko and Narmada show livelihood and Adivasi loss behind national projects. Class analysis treats the split as socialised costs and private gains. Anti-growth purity and growth-at-all-costs both fail the poor. Rights, consent and who decides are the sociological resolution.
Model answer
Introduction
- Development and environment are not two separate files. They are a dialectic: growth uses nature as a free input, then meets scarcity, protest, and a legitimacy crisis. Indian cases show who pays for the national surplus.
Body
The dialectic
- Development as dams, mines, highways, and cities treats forests, rivers, and air as resources. Environment returns as flood, pollution, and displaced people.
- Each ‘solution’ creates a new contradiction: a dam yields power and drowns a valley; a green city yields real estate and evicts a slum.
- A. R. Desai’s class dialectic fits: the project socialises loss and privatises gain.
Indian illustrations
- Chipko defended Himalayan forest as livelihood, not as scenery. It showed village women as environmental subjects.
- Narmada and Sardar Sarovar made the dialectic national: irrigation and electricity versus Adivasi submergence. The Narmada Bachao Andolan refused the account book that counted only megawatts.
- Industrial belts and informal workshops dump costs on slum air and river, so the working class lives the environmental bill.
Critiques of both poles
- A crude anti-development stand can freeze rural poverty. A crude growth stand treats Chipko as romance.
- Yogendra Singh’s modernizing state uses science as heterogenetic force; without consent, science is just another landlord.
- Market environmentalism and some NEP-era skill talk can greenwash without land rights.
Toward a sociological resolution
- Environment is a social relation of access to land, water, and air, structured by caste, tribe, and gender.
- Forest Rights Act, environmental impact assessment, and local movements are attempts to institutionalise the dialectic rather than deny it.
- Desired development is livelihoods that do not eat the ecological base of the poor.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DEV[Development projects] --> ENV[Land river forest air] ENV --> C[Crisis protest displacement] C --> DEV CH[Chipko Narmada] --> C
Conclusion
The dialectic of development and environment in India is class and ethnicity written on land and river. Chipko and Narmada show that growth without consent is dispossession. The task is not to pick one pole. It is to change who decides and who pays.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q1(b)). View answer →
-
Is environment only a middle-class concern?
In India the sharpest fights are often Adivasi, peasant and slum fights over land and water.
-
Can technology end the dialectic?
It can change the terms. It cannot abolish the question of who owns the river.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate on M.N. Srinivas's structural functionalist approach to the study of Indian society. -
2022 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain Leela Dube's concept of "Seed and Earth" -
2022 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine GS Ghurye's Indological approach to the understanding of Indian society. -
2022 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the material basis of patriarchy as an ideological system. -
2022 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss Law as an important instrument for women's empowerment. -
2022 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the changing nature of structure of political elites. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss recent trends in the structure of migration . -
2021 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What does Dr. B. R. Ambedkar mean by the concept of "Annihilation of caste" ?
More from this topic
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Educational development is the only Panacea for country's all ills and evils." Critically examine the above statement with reference to NEP-2020
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Education is necessary for mobility and anti-caste citizenship but not a solo panacea. NEP 2020 reforms structure, language, vocation and equity on paper. Without teachers, public finance and jobs, it becomes credentialism and a dual private-public system. Caste, land and informal labour reproduce ills that schooling alone cannot dissolve. Phule–Ambedkar were right to start with the school and wrong if we stop there.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the Private and Public network and support systems operative in Indian society for the aged? Suggest measures to curb down the challenges before care givers of the aged
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Private support for the aged is still mainly kin, plus a small paid-care market. Public support is pensions, NPHCE and the 2007 Maintenance Act, all thin relative to need. Nuclear residence and migration weaken the joint-family guarantee without ending dependence. Caregivers, mostly women, face time poverty and little respite. Measures must combine adequate pensions, home services and gender-equal family law.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Bring out various factors responsible for declining of village Industries in India.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Village industries declined through colonial competition, forest enclosure and the collapse of patronage. Post-independence mill goods, power-looms and plastics continued the squeeze. Credit, GST, and migration now pull youth out of hereditary crafts. Some clusters brand and survive; most artisan households enter informal labour. The process reorders caste occupations, not only GDP shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.