Revision summary
Village studies found factions around patrons and dominant castes. Factions organise local politics and resources. They often cut class solidarity vertically. The phrase fits many settlements, not a mystical Indian trait. Landless and women may stand outside the faction game.
Model answer
Introduction
- Indian villages are often faction-ridden: competing parties of kin, caste, and patrons, not a harmonious republic. The statement is largely true, and incomplete if faction hides class.
Body
Factions as structure
- Srinivas’s Rampura showed factions around dominant-caste leaders, land, and honour.
- S. C. Dube’s Shamirpet treated leadership and communication as split, not as one community mind.
- Oscar Lewis and others mapped vertical factions that cut across some jatis through patronage.
What factions do
- They organise votes, irrigation turns, and village office. Kothari’s caste politics has a local faction face.
- They can mute horizontal class unity of mazdoors, which Desai would stress.
Limit of the phrase
- Not every village is equally split. Some show caste blocs more than personal factions.
- Women and landless may be in the village without being in the faction.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD DC[Dominant caste land] --> F[Factions] F --> V[Votes irrigation office] CL[Class of labour] --> M[Muted by vertical factions]
Conclusion
Rural India is frequently faction-ridden because land and honour produce rival followings. Sociology should read factions as organised power, not as rustic quarrels without structure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the colonial policy of segregation of tribes under the Government of India Act, 1935.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Are factions the same as caste?
Factions often run inside a dominant caste and pull clients from others.
-
Did development end factions?
Schemes often become new prizes for the same followings.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society. -
2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society? -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Secularism was an outcome of 20th century humanistic radicalism." Comment on this statement. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Indian caste system is unique and has been unhealthy for the growth of sociology of India." How far do you agree with this view? -
2020 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss Whitehead's contention that caste has potential to displace class and colonial contradiction. -
2020 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Give an account of the consequences and remedies of chronic malnutrition in India. -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine Dube's contributions to the study of Indian villages -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is caste politics? Substantiate your answer with examples of how identities are defined by caste dynamics
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.