Revision summary
Mixed-economy planning combined public heights with private capital. Class and caste shaped who took industrial and canal gains. Displacement and regional skew were built-in issues. Informal labour meant no planned social wage for most workers. After 1991 the issue is steering markets, not abandoning the social question.
Model answer
Introduction
Development planning in India’s mixed economy had to industrialise, irrigate, and promise justice without abolishing private property. The main issues are still who plans, who pays, and who takes the surplus.
Body
Institutional issues
- Five-Year Plans mixed a public commanding height with private capital. Licence raj, delays, and later liberalisation are one continuous argument about how mixed is mixed.
- Centre-heavy planning strained democratic federalism; states lived with targets they did not write.
Social issues
- A. R. Desai: planning as a bourgeois path that thickened rich peasants and houses more than mazdoors.
- Caste filtered IITs, factories, and canal water. The plan was never caste-blind.
- Displacement of Adivasis for dams and steel made the national good a local land loss.
- Gender: women’s unpaid care was outside the plan’s worker.
Agrarian and regional issues
- Green Revolution success was regional. Dry tracts waited. MSP politics still shows that skew.
- Informal labour means planned industry did not plan a social wage, which COVID migrants revealed.
Ecological issues
- Green-cover loss, river linking dreams, and urban heat are the afterlife of growth planning without a metabolism.
After 1991
- The issue is not ‘no planning’ but planning as infrastructure, ease of business, and welfare schemes beside inequality.
- Prospects depend on whether mixed economy can still discipline capital for land, nutrition, and care.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ME[Mixed economy plans] --> G[Industry irrigation] ME --> U[Class caste displacement] L[Liberalisation] --> W[Infrastructure plus welfare]
Conclusion
Main issues of development planning in mixed-economy India are class-caste capture, federal imbalance, displacement, informality, and ecology. The mixed formula remains; the social question is whose development the mix serves.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you think MSP (Minimum Support Price) Scheme for ag can help in rural development? Elaborate your response with suitable examples.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Was the mix too socialist?
The social failure was exclusion, not only public ownership.
-
Did markets end the issues?
They changed the planner’s tools. Inequality and displacement continue.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Education is a key to social development. Elucidate -
2024 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine the relevance of development planning in India -
2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyze the idea of developmental planning in India -
2021 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the sociological significance of the New Education Policy and its thrust on vocationalization and skill development -
2021 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
The problem of displacement is inherent in the idea of development. Analyze the statement critically -
2019 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the importance of Development Planning in India Mixed Economy, and analyze its problems and prospects -
2018 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How do you relate the growth of development of metropoles and its impact on the mental and social life of people in India. -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Education and equality in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate A. R. Desai's perspective to the study of Indian society.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Desai reads Indian society through class and colonial capitalism. Nationalism is bourgeois-led and incomplete for labour. Land reform strengthened rich peasants more than mazdoors. Caste is real as it organises exploitation, not as India’s essence. Subaltern and gender critiques say consciousness is more than class party.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment.
Tribal communities in India
The 1829 ban criminalised widow burning after reformist pressure. It was a major legal strike at a sacralised evil. Widowhood as social death continued in property and honour. Colonial law also staged India as backward tradition. Annihilation needs kinship change, not only a prohibition.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How do you justify Dumont's deliberate stress on ideology that produce intellectualized account of Indian society?
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Dumont made hierarchy an ideology of purity, not a heap of customs. The binary explains caste as a coherent value system. The cost is a Brahmanical, intellectualised India. Srinivas, Beteille and Desai show land, class and disharmonic equality. Use Dumont for values; do not let texts replace interaction.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.